Factors associated with recovery and recurrence of depression in older people: A prospective study

The Liverpool Continuing Health in the Community Study has followed up 1070 elderly community subjects over 6 years. In the first year 123 subjects had case-level depression. Three years later 49 (39.8%) of the previously depressed were recovered, 33 (26.8%) were depressed, 16 (13%) were not available for interview and 25 (20.3%) were dead. This study looks at factors associated with the 3-year outcome of patients who were depressed at year 0. Two outcome groups that were compared were a recovered depression group and a recurrent/persistent depression group. The factors that were significantly associated with a recurrence of depression (or persistent depression) at year 3 were bereavement of a close figure in the 6 months before interview, loneliness and life dissatisfaction at year 3. A variety of traditional risk factors for depression (including age, marital status, physical ill-health and incapacity) failed to attain significance in predicting recurrent or persistent depression. When combined, both recovered and recurrently depressed groups at year 3 had significantly higher levels of pain and a higher number of serious upsets in the past 6 months and 6 weeks compared to a compared to a control group. The depressed at year 0 were more likely to have entered more dependent forms of accommodation by year 3.     

Course of depressive symptoms and medication adherence after acute coronary syndromes: an electronic medication monitoring study.

OBJECTIVES: We tested whether improvements in depressive symptoms precede improved adherence to aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). BACKGROUND: Depression is associated with medication nonadherence in patients with ACS, but it is unclear whether changes in depression impact on adherence. METHODS: Electronic medication monitoring was used to measure adherence to aspirin during a 3-month period in a consecutive cohort of 172 patients (25 to 85 years) recruited within 1 week of hospitalization for ACS. Depressive symptom severity was assessed using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) during hospitalization and at 1 and 3 months after hospitalization. Adherence was defined as the percentage of days aspirin was taken as prescribed. RESULTS: Depression severity in hospital was associated with nonadherence in a gradient fashion: 15% of non-depressed patients (BDI score 0 to 4), 29% of mildly depressed patients (BDI score 10 to 16), and 37% of patients with moderately-to-severely depressive symptoms (BDI score >16) took aspirin less than 80% of the time (p = 0.03). A cross-lagged path analytic model revealed that improvements in depressive symptoms in the first month after the ACS were associated with improvements in adherence rates in the subsequent 2 months (standardized direct effect -0.32, p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Diagnosis and treatment of depressive symptoms may improve medication adherence in patients after ACS.     

Therapeutic review: antibiotic prophylaxis for bacterial endocarditis

A recent survey of antibiotic prophylaxis found that local practice often differed from that recommended by authoritative bodies such as the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (BSAC) and the American Heart Association (AHA). Practitioners found the subject confusing and requested guidance. For these reasons we present current recommendations. Unfortunately all recommendations are based on animal studies and an understanding of the pathogenesis of bacterial endocarditis in humans. There are no controlled trials in humans on which to base guidelines, so rigidity is inappropriate. It is also important to realise that optimal prophylaxis will not eliminate bacterial endocarditis. In developed countries it has been estimated that only 10% of cases of endocarditis are theoretically preventable.     

Dexamethasone and indomethacin do not affect brain edema following head injury in rats

Head trauma was induced in rats by a weight-drop device, falling over the exposed skull over the left hemisphere. The neurological state of the rats was evaluated by a neurological severity score at 1 h and 18 h post head trauma. At 18 h post head trauma, rats were decapitated and tissue from the vicinity of the injury and from a corresponding area in the contralateral hemisphere was taken for specific gravity (SG) determination using linear gradient columns. Slices were taken from the same sites for incubation in Krebs-Ringer solution, and the concentrations of prostaglandin (PG)E2, 6-keto-PGF1 alpha, and thromboxane B2 accumulated in the medium during 1 h were measured by radioimmunoassay. In one experimental group, rats were pretreated with intraperitoneal dexamethasone sodium phosphate (4 mg/kg) 18 and 2 h before head trauma, and a third dose was given 8 h post head trauma. Another group was treated with intraperitoneal indomethacin (10 mg/kg) 1 h before and 7 h after head trauma. Other groups were treated immediately and 8 h after head trauma with 4, 8, 15, or 30 mg/kg of dexamethasone sodium phosphate. Another group of rats was treated with free dexamethasone (10 mg/kg) right after head trauma and 8 h later. Head trauma induced edema, as expressed by decreased SG, in the left hemisphere of all traumatized rats. Neither treatment protocol affected the neurological severity score of the injured rats or the SG of the contused hemisphere. PG synthesis, on the other hand, was significantly reduced following indomethacin or free dexamethasone, both in sham and traumatized rats, but not in dexamethasone sodium phosphate-treated rats. We conclude that pretreatment with indomethacin, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, or dexamethasone, used in the present protocols, does not affect posttraumatic cerebral edema. Thus, the role of PGs as mediators of edema formation remains unclear.     

Compliance with recommended prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism: improving the use and rate of uptake of clinical practice guidelines

Summary.  Although several authoritative, evidence-based, guidelines for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) have been published, the use of VTE prophylaxis in routine clinical practice varies markedly. Even in orthopedic surgery, the indication for which prophylaxis is used most often, a significant proportion of surgeons do not use routine prophylaxis. When prophylaxis is used, guideline recommendations are often not followed. A number of factors may contribute to the under-use of guidelines. Physician-related factors include: a lack of awareness of, or familiarity with, the guidelines; a perception that VTE is not a significant problem or that VTE prophylaxis is ineffective; and concern about potential bleeding risks. The guidelines may also be perceived to be too complicated or difficult to apply in a routine manner. In addition, a lack of facilities or resources may also present a barrier to implementation of the guidelines. A number of strategies are being investigated in an attempt to improve compliance with guidelines for VTE prophylaxis. For example, the Investigators Against Thromboembolism (INATE) initiative has developed a simplified pocket guideline on VTE prophylaxis in orthopedic and trauma surgery in order to raise awareness of the current guideline recommendations.     

Where's the Beef? The Promise and the Reality of Clinical Documentation

Physician-generated emergency department clinical documentation (information obtained from clinician observations and summarized decision processes inclusive of all manner of electronic systems capturing, storing, and presenting clinical documentation) serves four purposes: recording of medical care and communication among providers; payment for hospital and physician; legal defense from medical negligence allegations; and symptom/disease surveillance, public health, and research functions. In the consensus development process described by Handler, these objectives were balanced with the consideration of efficiency, often evaluated as physician time and clinical documentation system costs, in recording the information necessary for their accomplishment. The consensus panel session participants and authors recommend that 1) clinical documentation be electronically retrievable; 2) selection and implementation be evidence-based and grounded on valid metrics (research is needed to identify these metrics); 3) the user interface be crafted to promote clinical excellence through high-quality information collection and efficient charting techniques; 4) the priorities for integration of clinical information be standardized and implemented within enterprises and across health and information systems; 5) systems use accepted standards for bidirectional, real-time clinical data exchange, without limiting the location or number of simultaneous users; 6) systems fully utilize existing electronic sources of specific patient information and general medical knowledge; 7) systems automatically and reliably capture appropriate data that support electronic billing for emergency department services; and 8) systems promote bedside documentation and mobile access.     

Factor analysis of the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory in three large samples of nursing home patients with dementia and behavioral disturbance.

OBJECTIVE: Limited work has addressed the construct validity of the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) in nursing home patients. The authors tested the CMAI factor structure by use of data from three samples of nursing home patients categorized a priori as having at least mild behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia. METHODS: CMAI data were from the baseline assessment of three randomized, placebo-controlled trials of risperidone for treating elderly nursing home patients. Exploratory factor analyses were conducted on two trials (N = 304; N = 344), and the results of these exploratory factor analyses were then tested with confirmatory factor analysis by use of data from a third trial (N = 617). RESULTS: Principal-components analysis suggested the presence of four factors: 1) Aggressive Behavior (hitting, kicking, scratching, biting, pushing, grabbing, throwing things, cursing or verbal aggression, spitting, tearing things/destroying property, hurting self or others, screaming); 2) Physically Non-Aggressive Behavior (pacing, trying to get to a different place, general restlessness, inappropriate dressing or disrobing, handling things inappropriately, performing repetitious mannerisms); 3) Verbally Agitated Behavior (complaining, constant requests for attention, repetitive questions, negativism); and 4) Hiding and Hoarding. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the four-factor solution was a reasonable fit to the data. CONCLUSION: Four factors emerged on the CMAI in nursing home patients with behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia. The results obtained converge reasonably with previous publications concerning the factor structure of the CMAI, which, taken together, suggest a fairly robust factor structure for the instrument.