Pulmonary function following surgical repair of pectus excavatum: a meta-analysis.

The purpose of this study was to use a meta-analytical technique to examine the efficacy of surgical repair of pectus excavatum on pulmonary function. Studies were retrieved via computerized literature searches, cross-referencing from original and review articles. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) reporting quantitative measures of preoperative and postoperative pulmonary function; (2) published in the English language; (3) indexed between January 1960 and September 2005; (4) reporting the duration between which preoperative and postoperative assessments were conducted; and (5) describing the pulmonary assessment procedures. The titles and abstracts of potentially relevant articles were reviewed to determine whether they met the criteria for inclusion. Twelve studies representing 313 pectus excavatum patients met the inclusion criteria and were used for the meta-analysis. Random-effects modeling yielded a mean weighted effect size (ES) for pulmonary function which was statistically nonsignificant (ES=0.08, 95% CI=-0.20 to 0.35; P=0.58). The findings of the present study indicated that surgical repair of pectus excavatum does not significantly improve pulmonary function. These findings, however, may be a result of testing pulmonary function under conditions in which pectus excavatum does not manifest itself.     

Is colonoscopic screening appropriate in asymptomatic patients with family history of colon cancer?

Colonoscopy has been advocated by some investigators as the most appropriate means of screening asymptomatic patients with a positive family history of colorectal cancer. However, results of such screening have been widely disparate. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the yield of colonoscopy in a cohort of completely asymptomatic individuals with one or two first-degree relatives with a history of colorectal cancer and to compare this yield with that of colonoscopy in a group of patients with apparent anal bleeding. Patients with possible genetic disorders, such as familial polyposis, were excluded. A total of 160 asymptomatic patients and a comparison group of 137 patients with nonacute anorectal bleeding underwent colonoscopy. Colonoscopy was completed in 143 of the 160 study patients (89 percent) and in all of the comparison patients and did not result in any complications. Twenty-two adenomas were found in 17 study patients (10.6 percent); 16 of the 22 adenomas were less than 1 cm in size. In the comparison group, eight adenomas were identified (5.8 percent of patients). No cancers were identified. The difference in polyp frequency between groups was not significant. The relatively low yield of colorectal neoplasms discovered at colonoscopy in this study may in part be due to the small sample size or to the strict criteria used to define these asymptomatic patients but does not lend strong support to the notion that colonoscopy is an appropriate first step in screening the asymptomatic patient with one or two first-degree relatives with colon cancer.