The path forward to biomarker discovery in psoriatic disease: a report from the GRAPPA 2010 annual meeting

At the 2010 annual meeting of the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA), wide-ranging discussions were held regarding biomarker research in psoriatic disease. Consensus was reached on 2 areas of priority: (1) the study of soluble biomarkers of radiographic progression in psoriatic arthritis (PsA); and (2) the analysis of comorbidity biomarkers, specifically cardiovascular and articular, in a psoriasis inception cohort. For each of these areas, rigorous definition of the clinical phenotype of PsA will be essential. To date, 2 instruments have been identified to define the phenotype: the ClASsification of Psoriatic ARthritis criteria and various screening questionnaires. In this overview, we discuss the challenges of the clinical phenotype of PsA and review GRAPPA plans for developing a research program for biomarker discovery.     

A systematic mapping review of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) in care homes

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: A thorough understanding of the literature generated from research in care homes is required to support evidence-based commissioning and delivery of healthcare. So far this research has not been compiled or described. We set out to describe the extent of the evidence base derived from randomized controlled trials conducted in care homes. METHODS: A systematic mapping review was conducted of the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted in care homes. Medline was searched for "Nursing Home", "Residential Facilities" and "Homes for the Aged"; CINAHL for "nursing homes", "residential facilities" and "skilled nursing facilities"; AMED for "Nursing homes", "Long term care", "Residential facilities" and "Randomized controlled trial"; and BNI for "Nursing Homes", "Residential Care" and "Long-term care". Articles were classified against a keywording strategy describing: year and country of publication; randomization, stratification and blinding methodology; target of intervention; intervention and control treatments; number of subjects and/or clusters; outcome measures; and results. RESULTS: 3226 abstracts were identified and 291 articles reviewed in full. Most were recent (median age 6 years) and from the United States. A wide range of targets and interventions were identified. Studies were mostly functional (44 behaviour, 20 prescribing and 20 malnutrition studies) rather than disease-based. Over a quarter focussed on mental health. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to collate data from all RCTs conducted in care homes and represents an important resource for those providing and commissioning healthcare for this sector. The evidence-base is rapidly developing. Several areas - influenza, falls, mobility, fractures, osteoporosis - are appropriate for systematic review. For other topics, researchers need to focus on outcome measures that can be compared and collated.     

Prevalence of antibodies to beta2-glycoprotein I in systemic lupus erythematosus and their association with antiphospholipid antibody syndrome criteria: a single center study and literature review

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of anti-beta2-glycoprotein I antibodies (anti-beta2-GPI) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and to assess their association with and predictive value for the clinical classification criteria of the antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS). METHODS: One hundred thirty-three consecutive patients with SLE were recruited from 2 lupus clinics in the University of Toronto. Serum and plasma samples were tested for IgG anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL), prolonged partial thromboplastin time (PTT), a panel of lupus anticoagulant (LAC) assays, and anti-beta2-GPI (IgG, IgM, IgA). Normal ranges for the assays were established using 129 healthy controls. A literature review from 1992 to 2000 was performed using beta2-GPI, SLE, APS, thrombosis, and recurrent pregnancy loss as key search words. RESULTS: The distribution of anti-beta2-GPI antibodies (of any isotype) in each group were as follows: all patients with SLE, 36.8%; SLE with clinical features of APS, 40.4%; SLE without clinical features of APS, 34.9%; and healthy controls, 3%. The positive predictive values of prolonged PTT, IgG aCL, and anti-beta2-GPI for at least one clinical feature of APS in SLE were 59.3, 50.0, and 38.8%, respectively. There were 27 patients with SLE who had antibodies to beta2-GPI but a normal PTT and negative aCL and LAC. Six (20.7%) of these had a history of thrombosis and/or recurrent pregnancy loss. Twelve studies (including ours) were identified in which patient groups were similar and the same antibody isotype was measured. No agreement was apparent after reviewing the literature regarding an association of anti-beta2-GPI IgG and clinical features of APS in patients with SLE. CONCLUSION: Antibodies to beta2-GPI were frequently seen (35%) in our SLE population. The prevalence of anti-beta2-GPI was similar in those with (19/47) and without (39/86) APS. Anti-beta2-GPI did, however, identify 6 patients with clinical features of APS who were negative for aCL and prolonged PTT. Our results indicate that anti-beta2-GPI may provide additional information for the diagnosis of APS in SLE, but do not supercede other established assays. However, when we attempted to place our results in the context of other reports, the literature review revealed that secondary diagnoses of patient groups and assay techniques are too variable among different investigators to allow useful comparison. Thus, no conclusions could be drawn regarding anti-beta3-GPI and clinical features of secondary APS in SLE.     

Treatment of refractory psoriatic arthritis with infliximab: a 12 month observational study of 16 patients

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and toxicity of infliximab in patients with recalcitrant psoriatic arthritis (PsA). METHODS: Patients with treatment resistant PsA and at least six actively inflamed joints, who had failed to respond to at least two disease modifying agents, were included. Infliximab (5 mg/kg) was given at weeks 0, 2, 6, and every 6-8 weeks pending response. Clinical and laboratory measures included actively inflamed joint count (AJC), swollen joint count (SJC), psoriasis severity (PASI), HAQ, and SF-36. Response was defined as at least a 30% reduction in AJC and PASI. Differences from baseline were analysed using the signed rank test. RESULTS: Sixteen patients (12 male, 4 female), mean age 48 and disease duration 14 years, were included. At baseline the mean AJC was 22.5 and mean PASI 4.5. Eleven patients continued receiving methotrexate. The AJC did not show a statistically significant response. SJC improved significantly at week 54 (p = 0.01). The PASI improved significantly at weeks 14 (p = 0.001) and 30 (p = 0.002) and CRP was reduced significantly at week 30 (p = 0.02). The HAQ score improved at week 30 (p = 0.02). Six patients became positive for dsDNA without clinical features of a connective tissue disease. Six patients discontinued treatment owing to lack of efficacy (1) and toxicity (5). Other serious adverse events included: urticaria (3); thrombocytopenia (1); lower gastrointestinal bleeding (2); severe diarrhoea (2); serious infections (6). Raised transaminases, at least 1.5x normal, occurred in four patients. CONCLUSION: In refractory PsA, infliximab led to a marked improvement in psoriasis but modest response in joint disease. Toxicity and rate of treatment termination was high.     

Infection and disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus: a review of hospitalized patients

Infection is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). A review of all SLE admissions to our hospital during a 5-year period was conducted to determine the rate and nature of infection, and its association with overall disease activity, measured by the SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI). Eighty-one patients (79 women, 2 men) were admitted for a total of 2,738 days (176 admissions). There were 53 proven infections, giving an infection rate of 1.94/100 hospital days. Twenty-three (43.4%) of these were major infections (requiring IV antibiotics). Two of 3 deaths were due to septicemia. By logistic regression analysis, infection was significantly associated with disease activity (p = 0.005), but not with disease duration or prednisone dosage. Our data confirm that infection is common in hospitalized patients with SLE, is associated with overall disease activity independent of prednisone dose, and causes significant mortality. These facts should be borne in mind when hospitalization is considered for patients with SLE.     

Adalimumab for the treatment of patients with moderately to severely active psoriatic arthritis: results of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: Adalimumab, a fully human, anti-tumor necrosis factor monoclonal antibody, was evaluated for its safety and efficacy compared with placebo in the treatment of active psoriatic arthritis (PsA). METHODS: Patients with moderately to severely active PsA and a history of inadequate response to nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs were randomized to receive 40 mg adalimumab or placebo subcutaneously every other week for 24 weeks. Study visits were at baseline, weeks 2 and 4, and every 4 weeks thereafter. The primary efficacy end points were the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement (ACR20) response at week 12 and the change in the modified total Sharp score of structural damage at week 24. Secondary end points were measures of joint disease, disability, and quality of life in all patients, as well as the severity of skin disease in those patients with psoriasis involving at least 3% of body surface area. RESULTS: At week 12, 58% of the adalimumab-treated patients (87 of 151) achieved an ACR20 response, compared with 14% of the placebo-treated patients (23 of 162) (P < 0.001). At week 24, similar ACR20 response rates were maintained and the mean change in the modified total Sharp score was -0.2 in patients receiving adalimumab and 1.0 in those receiving placebo (P < 0.001). Among the 69 adalimumab-treated patients evaluated with the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), 59% achieved a 75% PASI improvement response at 24 weeks, compared with 1% of the 69 placebo-treated patients evaluated (P < 0.001). Disability and quality of life measures were also significantly improved with adalimumab treatment compared with placebo. Adalimumab was generally safe and well-tolerated. CONCLUSION: Adalimumab significantly improved joint and skin manifestations, inhibited structural changes on radiographs, lessened disability due to joint damage, and improved quality of life in patients with moderately to severely active PsA.