‘How Do You Remember You Ate…?’: A Delphi Technique Study to Identify Retrieval Categories From Fourth-Grade Children

Objective To develop and validate a consensus set of retrieval categories for how children remember what they have eaten, and to relate retrieval categories to accuracy of reporting items eaten during school lunch.Design A Delphi technique study was conducted using 10 psychologists. The subject matter consisted of responses transcribed from interviews conducted with 89 randomly selected fourth graders within 90 minutes of eating. Retrieval categories were evaluated for accuracy by comparing students’ self-reported lunch intake with observation.Statistical analyses For round 1, a centroid hierarchical cluster analysis was used to identify common sets of rating pairs to propose categories for reaching consensus. For rounds 2 and 3, percent of agreement was calculated. Accuracy was tabulated across meal items and student use by retrieval category.Results After round 3, we found that 23 “near-consensus”categories were used by at least eight raters. Six categories were used 60% of the time, 4 were used 20% of the time, and 5 were used 15% of the time. Less frequently used categories were combined with similar, more frequently used categories for a total of 16 categories. Students used a large variety of retrieval categories when accurately reporting consumption. Of the 16 categories, 12 were used similarly by both accurate and inaccurate students. Where there were differences in accuracy by retrieval category, the more accurate students used “taste/smell/texture”and “visual”in deference to “order items consumed”and “oral cue still present.”Applications These categories provide insight into the broad range of retrieval categories that children use and provide direction for researchers to design and study specific cues to enhance the accuracy of children's self-reports of diet. J Am Diet Assoc. 1997;97:31–36.     

Delta opioid receptor selective ligands; DPLPE-deltorphin chimeric peptide analogues†

Further efforts to correlate the topography of the bioactive structures of DPDPE and the deltorphins, two δ-opioid receptor active peptide families, are reported. A number of DPLPE-deltorphin chimeric peptides have been synthesized in which the C-terminal dipeptide δ-address of the deltorphins (-Val-GlyNH₂, -Nle-GlyNH₂) have been linked to the highly δ-opioid selective cyclic peptides DPDPE or DPLPE. These studies demonstrate that a major structural feature determining high potency of hybrid analogues is the chirality of the amino acid residue in position 5. The radioligand binding assays have revealed a decrease in potency (compared to DPDPE) at §-receptors when the C-terminal dipeptides were added to DPDPE. On the other hand, chimeric peptides of DPLPE with these same C-terminal dipeptides retained high δ-selectivity and affinity. Similar results were obtained using the mouse vas deferens (MVD) and guinea pig ileum (GPI) bioassays. The importance of the hydrophilicity of amino acids in positions 2 and 5 for δ-selectivity is consistent with the previous finding for DPLPE and DPDPE. On the other hand, the replacement of phenylalanine-4 with p-chlorophenylalanine-4 did not increase δ-selectivity as in DPDPE. These findings suggest that the δ-receptor interacts with hybridized enkephalins and deltorphins somewhat differently than with DPDPE.     

Localization of PEPD to the long arm of chromosome 19

A panel of human-rodent somatic cell hybrids containing different regions of chromosome 19 has been used to obtain a regional localization for peptidase D. The results assign PEPD to the long arm of chromosome 19, in the region cen-g13.2.     

Effects of stress and shock anticipation on prepulse inhibition of the startle reflex

The effects of shock anticipation and attention to external stimuli on prepulse inhibition (PPI) were compared. In the threat-of-shock experiment, acoustic startle stimuli were presented with and without prepulses when aversive shocks were or were not anticipated. In the control experiment, startle and prepulse stimuli were delivered during periods with attended or ignored external stimuli. In the threat-of-shock experiment, startle was potentiated (fear-potentiated startle) and PPI was increased by shock anticipation. A gradual reduction in the overall PPI throughout the experiment was also found. In the control experiment, only PPI was increased in the attend condition. The PPI level remained constant throughout the experiment. The increase in PPI in the threat and attend conditions may have resulted from an increase in the general level of alertness that facilitated the processing of the prepulse. The gradual decrease in PPI in the threat experiment was hypothesized to result from a progressive deficit in sensory functioning due to the stressful nature of repeated shock anticipation.