Prognosis of patients with acute renal failure requiring dialysis: results of a multicenter study

Despite several decades of clinical experience, the mortality rate for patients with acute renal failure (ARF) requiring dialysis remains high, and the evaluation of the patients prognosis has been difficult. To date, the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) scoring system has been used more frequently for prediction in studies of ARF than any other scoring system, but has not been prospectively validated in controlled multicenter studies of this entity. In a multicenter, prospective, controlled trial evaluating the use of biocompatible hemodialysis membranes (BCMs) in patients with ARF, we evaluated the extent to which the APACHE II scoring system, based on the physiological variables in the 24 hours before the onset of dialysis and the presence or absence of oliguria, is predictive of outcome. Analysis of survival and recovery of renal function for the 153 patients treated in this study show that APACHE II scores are predictive both of survival and recovery of renal function, whether analyzed separately by type of dialysis membrane used (BCM or bioincompatible [BICM]) or for both groups combined (all P < 0.01). There was no evidence of a significant center effect or interaction of APACHE II score with dialysis membrane in our study. After adjusting for the APACHE II score, there was a positive effect of the BCM on both probability of survival (P < 0.05) and recovery of renal function (P < 0.01). In patients dialyzed with BCMs, oliguria at onset of dialysis had an adverse effect on both survival and recovery of renal function (both P < 0.01). Receiver operator curves (ROCs) using APACHE II score and the use of BCMs in nonoliguric patients yielded a statistically significant improvement versus the use of APACHE II score alone in the area under the curve (AUC) for survival (0.747 to 0.801; P < 0.05) and recovery of renal function (0.712 to 0.775; P < 0.05). We conclude that the use of the APACHE II score determined at the time of initiation of dialysis for patients with ARF is a statistically significant predictor of patient survival and recovery of renal function. The use of the APACHE II score measured at the time of dialysis initiation, especially when modified by the presence or absence of oliguria, should help in predicting outcome when evaluating interventions for patients with ARF.     

A human-oriented framework for developing assistive service robots

Purpose: Multipurpose robots that can perform a range of useful tasks have the potential to increase the quality of life for many people living with disabilities. Owing to factors such as high system complexity, as-yet unresolved research questions and current technology limitations, there is a need for effective strategies to coordinate the development process.

Method: Integrating established methodologies based on human-centred design and universal design, a framework was formulated to coordinate the robot design process over successive iterations of prototype development.

Results: An account is given of how the framework was practically applied to the problem of developing a personal service robot. Application of the framework led to the formation of several design goals which addressed a wide range of identified user needs. The resultant prototype solution, which consisted of several component elements, succeeded in demonstrating the performance stipulated by all of the proposed metrics.

Conclusions: Application of the framework resulted in the development of a complex prototype that addressed many aspects of the functional and usability requirements of a personal service robot. Following the process led to several important insights which directly benefit the development of subsequent prototypes.

• Implications for Rehabilitation

• This research shows how universal design might be used to formulate usability requirements for assistive service robots.

• A framework is presented that guides the process of designing service robots in a human-centred way.

• Through practical application of the framework, a prototype robot system that addressed a range of identified user needs was developed.

     

Blood donation leads to a decrease in natural killer cell activity: a study in normal blood donors and cancer patients

Transfusion-induced immunosuppression has long been known to be beneficial for organ transplantation patients, but recent retrospective studies suggest that blood transfusions may be detrimental for patients with cancer. If autologous blood is used to avoid immunosuppression, the assumption is that the procedure, involving blood donation, is immunologically neutral. In the present study, this assumption was evaluated by monitoring 33 normal blood donors and 16 colorectal cancer patients before and after donation of 1 (500 mL) and 2 units of blood, respectively. The cancer patients belonged to the autologous arm of a randomized trial in which the effects of allogeneic versus autologous blood on cancer prognosis were studied. The patients donated 2 units of blood with an interval of 3 to 4 days between donations. Flow cytometric analysis revealed that blood donation by normal donors and cancer patients had no effect on the proportion of B, T, and natural killer (NK) cells. Only the total number of lymphocytes was significantly decreased in the normal donors on Day 12 after donation. Blood donation had no significant effect on T-cell function assessed by phytohemagglutinin stimulation in normal donors or in cancer patients donating 2 units of blood. A significant depression of NK cell function (88% and 74% of predonation levels) was observed in normal donors on Days 2 and 5 after donation; on Day 12, the activity was again normal. Colorectal cancer patients had a significantly depressed NK cell activity (54% of predonation activity) on Day 12 after the first donation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)