Identification of two genetic markers that distinguish pathogenic and nonpathogenic strains of Acanthamoeba spp.

Species-level identification of Acanthamoeba isolates is difficult and gives little or no indication of the isolate's pathogenicity. We identified two amplification-based genetic markers that were highly correlated with pathogenicity in Acanthamoeba spp. One marker, designed to amplify a 485-bp fragment of the small-subunit ribosomal RNA gene (ssrDNA), was preferentially amplified from the nonpathogenic strains; amplifications from the pathogenic strains yielded anomalous fragments of 650 and 900?bp. A second marker was developed on the basis of the anomalous 650-bp fragment. Primers to this sequence preferentially amplified a noncoding locus (called Ac6) only from the pathogenic strains. These two genetic markers may be useful for identification of pathogenic Acanthamoeba spp. strains.     

Further characterization of morphologically defined typical and atypical CLL: a clinical, immunophenotypic, cytogenetic and prognostic study on 390 cases

We analysed a group of 390 patients, diagnosed with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL). Cases were subclassified as morphologically typical and atypical CLL according to the criteria of the FAB proposal. Typical CLL cases were mostly diagnosed at a low-risk stage (Binet A/Rai 0), required no immediate treatment and expected a long survival; atypical CLL cases mostly presented at a more advanced risk stage (Binet B/Rai I–II), usually required immediate treatment and their survival was shorter. Moreover, clinical staging was of prognostic significance in typical but not in atypical cases.   In typical CLL, del(11q) was the most common chromosomal abnormality (21%) whereas in atypical CLL trisomy 12 was found in about 65% of the cases documented with an abnormal karyotype. Although chromosomal abnormalities were associated with a poor survival in typical CLL, they are of no prognostic significance in atypical CLL.   Based on these data, we conclude that subtyping CLL by morphology enables the identification of two groups of cases, each characterized by a specific clinical presentation, different cytogenetic abnormalities and prognostic parameters. We speculate that these two groups may represent two related, but different, diseases with different prognostic parameters and a different survival.     

A randomized controlled trial of antibiotics on symptom resolution in patients presenting to their general practitioner with a sore throat.

BACKGROUND: Sore throat is a common symptom presented to general practitioners (GPs), and there remains controversy about the appropriate use of antibiotics. AIM: To compare, in a randomized controlled trial, the effectiveness of penicillin, cefixime and placebo on symptom resolution in patients presenting with a sore throat in general practice. METHOD: Twenty-two GPs in Avon recruited 154 patients, aged 16-60 years, presenting to their GP with a sore throat, and for whom the GP would normally prescribe an antibiotic. Patients were randomized to one of three groups: penicillin V 250 mg four times a day; cefixime 200 mg daily; and placebo. Each was prescribed for five days. The main outcome measures were a diary of symptom resolution over seven days and eradication of group A beta-haemolytic streptococcus (GABHS). RESULTS: Of the 103 (67%) patients who completed symptom diaries, 40 were allocated to receive penicillin, 29 cefixime and 34 placebo. In the analysis including all patients, symptom resolution was greater by day 3 in the cefixime group than in the placebo group. Penicillin did not improve symptom resolution by day 3 compared with placebo, and cefixime was not statistically significantly different from penicillin. There were significant differences in the proportion of patients using analgesia at day 3, with the proportion being lowest in the cefixime group. The results for the subgroup of patients without GABHS were similar to those for all patients; in particular, the only statistically significant difference was between cefixime and placebo. Although numbers were too small for statistical significance, among patients with GABHS the effects of penicillin and cefixime were similarly raised in relation to placebo. CONCLUSION: Compared with placebo, cefixime can improve the rate of resolution of symptoms in patients with a sore throat who are selected for antibiotic treatment by their GP. The unexpected finding that cefixime was of benefit compared with placebo for patients without GABHS suggests that bacteria other than GABHS may be important in the pathogenesis of sore throat.     

International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 2005; Vol.14, No.3, 158–166

The original article to which this Erratum refers was published in International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 2005; Vol.14, No.3, 158–166. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.