Comparing the Approach to Radical Prostatectomy Using the Multiport da Vinci Xi and da Vinci SP Robots: A Propensity Score Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes

BackgroundUse of the single-port da Vinci SP robotic platform for various urological procedures has been described by several groups. However, the comparative performance of the SP robot in relation to earlier models such as the da Vinci Xi is still unclear.ObjectiveTo compare intraoperative and short-term postoperative outcomes between the da Vinci Xi and SP robots for patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) in a referral center.Design, setting, and participantsData were prospectively collected for patients undergoing RP from June 2019 to April 2020 in a single center. The da Vinci SP was used for 71 patients and the da Vinci Xi for 875 patients. After propensity score (PS) matching, two groups of 71 patients were selected for the comparative study.InterventionRP via a transperitoneal approach using the same technique steps and anatomy access with both robot consoles.Outcome measurements and statistical analysisA PS analysis was performed using the covariates age, body mass index, Charlson comorbidity index, Sexual Health Inventory for Men score, American Urological Association symptom score, prostate size, prostate-specific antigen levels, Gleason score, D’Amico risk group, and degree of nerve-sparing. Intraoperative performance and short-term functional (continence and potency) and oncological outcomes were compared between the groups.Results and limitationsMedian follow-up was 4.4 mo (interquartile range [IQR] 1.6–7.2) for the SP group and 3.2 mo (IQR 1.6–4.8) for the Xi group (p = 0.2). The median total operative time and median console time were both significantly higher in the SP group, with median differences of 14 min (95% confidence interval [CI] 9–19) and 5 min (95% CI 0–5), respectively. The proportion of patients with blood loss of >100 ml was significantly lower in the SP group (difference of 27%, 95% CI 12–42%). No intra- or postoperative complications were reported in either group. There were no significant differences in pain scores at 6, 12, and 18 h or in positive surgical margin rates between the groups. The SP group had a significantly higher percentage of extraprostatic extension than the Xi group (difference of 16%, 95% CI 4.6–27%). None of the patients experienced biochemical recurrence during follow-up. The difference in continence rates at 45 d between the SP and Xi groups was 11% (95% CI ?5.6% to 28%) and the difference in potency rates at 45 d was ?7.3% (95% CI ?21% to 6.2%). The short-term follow-up for comparison of functional and oncological outcomes is a limitation.ConclusionsDespite differences in trocar placement and technology between the two da Vinci consoles, the SP has satisfactory intraoperative performance compared to the Xi. SP surgery can be performed safely and effectively during the initial learning phase. However, longer-term follow-up is needed to provide further evidence on the impact of SP implementation on functional and oncological outcomes.Patient summaryWe compared intraoperative and short-term postoperative outcomes for patients who underwent radical prostatectomy using two different robots, the da Vinci Xi and the single-port da Vinci SP. We found that operative time was longer for the Single Port console. Studies with long-term follow-up are needed to compare the functional and oncological outcomes.     

Conversion of Fused Hip to Total Hip Arthroplasty: Long-Term Clinical and Radiological Outcomes

BackgroundDespite promising results at the mid-term followup, several aspects of conversion of the fused hip to total hip arthroplasty (THA) remain controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical and radiological outcomes with a minimum 5-year followup in patients who underwent conversion of the fused hip to THA.MethodsFifty-seven patients (59 hips) were evaluated. The Harris Hip Score (HHS), range of motion (ROM), and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were used to assess hip function and low back pain. Subjective satisfaction with surgery and the presence of the Trendelenburg sign was also evaluated. Radiological assessment was performed pre- and postoperatively to evaluate loosening and heterotopic ossification (HO).ResultsAfter a mean followup of 13.0 ± 6.2 years, HHS and VAS significantly improved from 46.0 ± 16.7 to 80.8 ± 18.8 and from 4.4 ± 1.5 to 2.1 ± 1.4 (both P < .001), respectively. Twenty-three patients (40.4%) had a positive Trendelenburg sign, and HOs were found in 29 cases (49.1%). An overall 29.8% complication rate was noted. Smoking habits and rheumatoid arthritis were predictive of Trendelenburg sign (P = .046 and P = .038, respectively). Implant survival rate as the end point was 98.7 ± 1.3% at 5 years, 92.4 ± 3.3% at 10 years, 82.1 ± 5.7% at 15 years, and 73.4 ± 8.0% at 20 and 25 years. A worse cumulative implant survival rate was noted in patients who underwent previous hip surgery, defined as any hip operation before fusion (P = .005).ConclusionConversion of the fused hip to hip arthroplasty provides high levels of hip functionality and satisfaction with surgery at long-term followup. An implant survival rate higher than 70% can be expected 25 years postoperatively.     

Effects of the Calcium Antagonist Felodipine on Resting and Stress Testing Blood Pressure in Essential Hypertension

The current study analyzed the effects of different doses of the calcium channel blocker felodipine on cardiovascular response to a set of standardized laboratory tasks. We randomly allocated 21 essential hypertensive patients to receive extended release felodipine 5 mg, felodipine 10 mg and placebo, each given once daily for 2 weeks, according to a double-blind 3-period design. At the end of each treatment period, patients were examined at resting baseline and while performing a mental arithmetic test, a handgrip test and a cycle ergometry test. Compared to placebo, the average fall in resting blood pressure (BP) was of 7.9 ± 5.6/6.1 ± 4.5 mm Hg with felodipine 5 mg (p < 0.01) and of 15.1 ± 5.8/13.9 ± 4.5 mm Hg with felodipine 10 mg (p < 0.001). During mental arithmetic, BP decrease was 11.6 ± 8.1/9 ± 5 mm Hg with felodipine 5 mg (p < 0.01) and 20.4 ± 8.1/15.3 ± 5 mm Hg with felodipine 10 mg (p < 0.001). During handgrip test, BP was significantly reduced after both felodipine doses by 11.7 ± 9.3/9.5 ± 6.5 mm Hg (p < 0.05) and 22.1 ± 9.3/22.4 ± 6.5 mm Hg (p < 0.001), respectively. During cycle ergometry, systolic BP was significantly reduced after felodipine 10 mg by 20.1 ± 9.4 mm Hg (p < 0.001), whereas the fall induced by felodipine 5 mg (7.7 ± 9.4 mm Hg) was not statistically significant (p > 0.05); diastolic BP was significantly reduced by both felodipine doses [average fall of 6.6 ± 5.8 mm Hg (p < 0.05) after felodipine 5 mg and of 12.7 ± 5.8 mm Hg (p < 0.001) after felodipine 10 mg]. There was no treatment effect on the magnitude of systolic BP reactivity from baseline during either mental arithmetic, handgrip test or cycle ergometry (all, p > 0.05). Heart rate values were significantly higher after both felodipine doses than after placebo, either at rest or during stress testing (all, p < 0.05). These data suggest that felodipine, especially at higher doses, may be effective in lowering BP not only at rest but also during exposure to commonly recurring stressful situations.     

Prognostic Stratification by Conventional Echocardiography of Patients with Aortic Stenosis: The “CAIMAN‐ECHO Score”

Background and Aim: Surgery is not recommended in asymptomatic patients with aortic stenosis (AS). However, prognosis of these patients is worse than retained. We built a simple score (named by the acronym “CAIMAN”) for stratifying asymptomatic patients with AS according to the different risk for cardiovascular events. Material and Methods: Data from 141 patients with moderate‐to‐severe AS followed up for 36 months were analyzed. The end point “outcome” was defined as death of all causes or aortic valve replacement imposed by symptoms or hospital admission for myocardial infarction and/or heart failure. The score was validated in 143 patients prospectively recruited in 2 different centers. Results: The 40 events occurred in the original cohort were associated with higher aortic transvalvular peak jet velocity, calcium score, and observed/predicted left ventricular (LV) mass ratio. Based on the hazard ratios of Cox analysis, the score was calculated as follows: calcium score 1–3 = 1 point, 4 = 6 points; transvalvular peak jet velocity ≤3.6 m/sec = 1 point, 3.6 m/sec = 3 points, observed/predicted LV mass ratio ≤110% = 1 point, >110% = 3 points. After a mean period of 28 ± 18 months, event‐free survival was 18%, 42%, 91%, and 96% in the 4 quartiles of echo score. The accuracy of the score in predicting events was 84% and 77% (P = 0.09) in the original and validation cohort, respectively. Conclusions: The CAIMAN‐ECHO score is a simple and feasible tool useful for an accurate prognostic stratification of patients with asymptomatic moderate‐to‐severe AS.     

Oral anticoagulation and VKORC1 polymorphism in patients with a mechanical heart prosthesis: a 6-year follow-up

Therapy with Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) effectively reduces the thrombosis risk in many clinical conditions. Genetic variants of vitamin K epoxide reductase (VKORC-1) are associated with increased VKA effect and bleeding risk. It is unknown whether these variants could also affect the long-term outcome in patients with high-dosage oral anticoagulation and/or more difficult adherence to the therapeutic INR range. Hundred and twenty-four patients with mechanical heart valve replacement assuming VKA were genotyped for VKORC-1 ?1639G>A (Rs9923231) polymorphism. Hemorrhage, venous thrombosis and atherothrombotic events were retrospectively assessed for a 6-year period. Furthermore, stability of their INR in relationship with the VKORC-1 genotype was investigated day-by-day for 3?months. No differences were observed in hemorrhage and venous thrombosis events according to rs 9923231. GG genotype carriers (n?=?41) had no atherothrombotic events, while 4 strokes, 4 TIA and 3 AMI were diagnosed in A carriers (n?=?83; P?=?0.0008). During the daily observation period, A allele carriers had lower VKA requirements (4.7, 3.7, 2.2?mg/day for GG/GA/AA genotype respectively; P?=?0.00001), higher mean INR (2.7, 2.8, 2.9; P?=?0.05) and a higher number of examinations above the therapeutic range than GG carriers (17 % vs. 0 % in GG genotype, P?=?0.036). Conversely, patients with GG genotype had a more stable dosage of VKA (P?=?0.006) and a higher percentage of examinations under the therapeutic range (51, 43 and 36 % in GG, GA and AA genotype, respectively, P?=?0.040). In patients with high dosage VKA, VKORC-1 polymorphism is associated to a different warfarin dosage, anticoagulation level, time spent outside the therapeutic range and, in the long-term, a different incidence of atherothrombotic events.