Therapeutic apheresis in low weight patients: technical feasibility, tolerance, compliance, and risks.

The use of therapeutic apheresis in very low weight patients is generally thought to have limitations, because of possible severe adverse reactions, potential risk related to the extracorporeal procedure, due to the low weight of the young patients. A careful therapeutic approach using appropriate precautions, and also introducing modifications to the standard procedure, can minimise the risk without compromising the efficacy of the plasmapheresis. The aim of the study was to evaluate apheresis tolerance and acceptability in children [Artif. Organs. 21 (1997) 1126] and infants [J. Clin. Apheresis 5 (1989) 21] with inherited lipid metabolism disorder, familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), primary hyperlipoproteinemia (lipoprotein phenotype I), and acute leukemia, weighing on average 20.55 kg. One thousand one hundred twenty three aphereses were completed. Three types of apheresis were performed: leukapheresis, plasma exchange, dextran sulphate cellulose (DSC) low density lipoprotein (LDL)-apheresis. Three different types of continuous flow systems were used. Technical adaptation depending on patients blood volume, body mass index, hematocrit, type of system used, permitted us to perform complete aphereses, obtaining a high degree of tolerance and acceptability of the treatment. The use of plasmapheresis is regarded to be an extreme therapeutic measure in children. However, when the need for such treatment is undebatable, plasmapheresis must be done. A well-trained and experienced team can overcome the technical difficulties in order to complete the procedures without complications. The most frequently observed adverse effects are vascular relative access insufficiency (2.0%), and mild hypotension (2.0%).     

Epilepsy syndromes associated with hypothalamic hamartomas.

PURPOSE: Hypothalamic hamartoma (HH) related epilepsy presents with gelastic seizures (GS), other seizure types and cognitive deterioration. Although seizure origin in GS has been well established, non-GS are poorly characterized. Their relationship with the HH and cognitive deterioration remains poorly understood. We analyzed seizure type, spread pattern in non-GS and their relationship with the epileptic syndrome in HH. METHODS: We documented all current seizure types in six adult patients with HH-epilepsy with video-EEG monitoring, characterized clinical-electrographic features of gelastic and non-gelastic seizures and correlated these findings with cognitive profile, as well as MRI and ictal SPECT data. RESULTS: Only four seizure types were seen: GS, complex partial (CPS), tonic seizures (TS) and secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures (sGTC). An individual patient presented either CPS or TS, but not both. GS progressed to CPS or TS, but not both. Ictal patterns in GS/TS and in GS/CPS overlapped, suggesting ictal spread from the HH to other cortical regions. Ictal SPECT patterns also showed GS/TS overlap. Patients with GS-CPS presented a more benign profile with preserved cognition and clinical-EEG features of temporal lobe epilepsy. Patients with GS-TS had clinical-EEG features of symptomatic generalized epilepsy, including mental deterioration. CONCLUSIONS: Video-EEG and ictal SPECT findings suggest that all seizures in HH-related epilepsy originate in the HH, with two clinical epilepsy syndromes: one resembling temporal lobe epilepsy and a more catastrophic syndrome, with features of a symptomatic generalized epilepsy. The epilepsy syndrome may be determined by HH size or by seizure spread pattern.     

Aortic prosthetic ring annuloplasty: a useful adjunct to a standardized aortic valve-sparing procedure?

OBJECTIVE: Dilation of aortic annulus, sinuses of Valsalva, and sinotubular junction (STJ) diameters are the characteristic lesions of aortic root aneurysm. The remodeling technique reduces STJ diameter and creates three neosinuses of Valsalva. Alternatively, the reimplantation technique reduces both annulus and STJ diameters to the detriment of aortic root dynamics. Although the remodeling technique is recognized as the most physiological valve-sparing procedure, aortic annulus dilation may jeopardize its results. A standardized approach that combines an external subvalvular aortic prosthetic ring annuloplasty with the remodeling technique is suggested. METHODS: Eighty-three patients underwent an elective aortic root remodeling procedure, either isolated (group 1, n=34) or combined with an external subvalvular aortic prosthetic ring annuloplasty (group 2, n=49). Preoperative aortic regurgitation was 1.59+/-1.1 (group 1) and 1.97+/-1.3 (group 2) (NS). The aortic annulus was more dilated in group 2 than in group 1 (27+/-2.77 mm vs 26.4+/-2.3 mm, p<0.01). Residual aortic regurgitation > or =grade II was the conversion criteria for aortic valve replacement. RESULTS: Operative mortality was 3.6% (n=3). Intraoperative conversion for valve replacement was 32.7% in group 1 (n=11) versus 4.2% in group 2 (n=2) (p<0.001). In group 1, preoperative annulus diameter was larger for converted than for valve-spared patients (27.6+/-1.7 mm vs 25.2+/-1.5 mm, p<0.02). In group 2, implanted aortic ring significantly reduced annulus diameter (20.6+/-1.8 mm) without significant aortic valve gradient (8.3+/-3 mmHg). Follow-up was 17.2+/-13.4 months (group 1) and 10.41+/-7.95 months (group 2). Reoperation for recurrent aortic regurgitation was 13% in group 1 (n=3) versus 4.2% in group 2 (n=2). Echocardiographic follow-up found residual aortic regurgitation < or =grade I in 17 patients in group 1 (90%) versus 43 patients in group 2 (95.5%) and of grade II in two patients in group 1 (10%) and two patients in group 2 (4.5%). CONCLUSION: The addition of external aortic prosthetic ring annuloplasty improves the remodeling technique's operative reproducibility and short-term results. Therefore, its use as a systematical adjunct to the remodeling procedure is suggested. However, further long-term evaluation comparing this valve-sparing procedure to composite graft replacement should define the best surgical strategy for aortic root aneurysm.