Mutation and genomic amplification of the PIK3CA proto-oncogene in pituitary adenomas

The tumorigenesis of pituitary adenomas is poorly understood. Mutations of the PIK3CA proto-oncogene, which encodes the p110-α catalytic subunit of PI3K, have been reported in various types of human cancers regarding the role of the gene in cell proliferation and survival through activation of the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. Only one Chinese study described somatic mutations and amplification of the PIK3CA gene in a large series of pituitary adenomas. The aim of the present study was to determine genetic alterations of PIK3CA in a second series that consisted of 33 pituitary adenomas of different subtypes diagnosed by immunohistochemistry: 6 adrenocorticotropic hormone-secreting microadenomas, 5 growth hormone-secreting macroadenomas, 7 prolactin-secreting macroadenomas, and 15 nonfunctioning macroadenomas. Direct sequencing of exons 9 and 20 assessed by qPCR was employed to investigate the presence of mutations and genomic amplification defined as a copy number ≥4. Previously identified PIK3CA mutations (exon 20) were detected in four cases (12.1%). Interestingly, the Chinese study reported mutations only in invasive tumors, while we found a PIK3CA mutation in one noninvasive corticotroph microadenoma. PIK3CA amplification was observed in 21.2% (7/33) of the cases. This study demonstrates the presence of somatic mutations and amplifications of the PIK3CA gene in a second series of pituitary adenomas, corroborating the previously described involvement of the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway in the tumorigenic process of this gland.     

Human macroprolactin displays low biological activity via its homologous receptor in a new sensitive bioassay

CONTEXT: Macroprolactinemia is a frequent finding in hyperprolactinemic individuals, usually without clinical impact. Data on biological activity of macroprolactin (bbPRL) are controversial and mostly based on a heterologous rat Nb2 cell bioassay. Biological activity of bbPRL observed in vitro but not in vivo may be due to its high molecular weight, preventing its passage through capillary barrier. Alternatively, bbPRL bioactivity may differ depending on the prolactin (PRL) receptor (PRLR) species specificity. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to characterize the bioactivity of bbPRL in a homologous bioassay: Ba/F-3 cells stably expressing the human PRLR. DESIGN/SETTING/PATIENTS: Chromatography-purified bbPRL from macroprolactinemic individuals (group I, n = 18) and monomeric PRL from hyperprolactinemic patients without macroprolactinemia (group II, n = 5) were tested in Nb2 and Ba/F-LLP bioassays. Both groups were followed up at the neuroendocrinology outpatients' clinic. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Biological activity of bbPRL presented in the two bioassays was measured. RESULTS: In group I, no patient had hypogonadism. Mean ratio bioactivity to immunoactivity of bbPRL in the Nb2 assay was 0.69. There was no dose-response in 15 of the 18 samples tested in Ba/F-LLP assay. In group II, three patients had galactorrhea and all five had hypogonadism. Mean ratio bioactivity to immunoactivity of monomeric PRL samples was 1.35 in Nb2 and 0.91 in Ba/F-LLP assay. CONCLUSION: Whereas both bioassays achieve similar results with respect to monomeric PRL activity, our results indicate that the activity displayed by bbPRL toward the rat receptor may be inappropriate because it is not observed in the human PRLR-mediated assay, consistent with the apparent absence of bioactivity in vivo.     

Posterior parietal rTMS disrupts human Path Integration during a vestibular navigation task

In contrast to vision, the neuro-anatomical substrates of vestibular perception are obscure. The vestibular apparati provide a head angular velocity signal allowing perception of self-motion velocity. Perceived change of angular position-in-space can also be obtained from the vestibular head velocity signal via a process called Path Integration (so-called since displacement is obtained by a mathematical temporal integration of the vestibular velocity signal). It is unknown however, if distinct cortical loci sub-serve vestibular perceptions of velocity versus displacement (i.e. Path Integration). Previous studies of human brain activity have not used head motion stimuli hence precluding localisation of vestibular cortical areas specialised for Path Integration distinct from velocity perception. We inferred vestibular cortical function by measuring the disrupting effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on the performance of a displacement-dependent vestibular navigation task. Our data suggest that posterior parietal cortex is involved in encoding contralaterally directed vestibular-derived signals of perceived angular displacement and a similar effect was found for both hemispheres. We separately tested whether right posterior parietal cortex was involved in vestibular-sensed velocity perception but found no association. Overall, our data demonstrate that posterior parietal cortex is involved in human Path Integration but not velocity perception. We suggest that there are separate brain areas that process vestibular signals of head velocity versus those involved in Path Integration.