Ultrasound-directed transvaginal myolysis: preclinical studies

The ultimate goal is to develop a safe vaginal ultrasound-directed myolysis needle to treat uterine myomas. The specific preclinical study objective was to determine the optimal power to coagulate myomas in hysterectomy specimens with a prototype needle in a prospective preclinical study with an echogenic insulated needle electrode. In phase I of the study, myolysis was performed with ultrasound guidance at various powers and times. In phase II, a 20-W coagulating current was applied at defined distances from the serosa and surface temperatures measured. Myolysis with 10 to 20 W applied 5 to 10 seconds was optimal, because tissue popping occurred at 30 W or more when the needle was 5 mm or less from the serosa. The serosal temperature was never elevated above physiological ranges at any distance at this setting. Ultrasound-directed transvaginal myolysis may provide another option for women with uterine myomas if it is proven safe and effective in future clinical studies. On the basis of the observations in these preclinical studies, myolysis with 20 W for 10 seconds should be a safe parameter for clinical research, because there is no increased serosal temperature at these settings.     

GRADE guidelines: 13. Preparing Summary of Findings tables and evidence profiles—continuous outcomes

Presenting continuous outcomes in Summary of Findings tables presents particular challenges to interpretation. When each study uses the same outcome measure, and the units of that measure are intuitively interpretable (e.g., duration of hospitalization, duration of symptoms), presenting differences in means is usually desirable. When the natural units of the outcome measure are not easily interpretable, choosing a threshold to create a binary outcome and presenting relative and absolute effects become a more attractive alternative.When studies use different measures of the same construct, calculating summary measures requires converting to the same units of measurement for each study. The longest standing and most widely used approach is to divide the difference in means in each study by its standard deviation and present pooled results in standard deviation units (standardized mean difference). Disadvantages of this approach include vulnerability to varying degrees of heterogeneity in the underlying populations and difficulties in interpretation. Alternatives include presenting results in the units of the most popular or interpretable measure, converting to dichotomous measures and presenting relative and absolute effects, presenting the ratio of the means of intervention and control groups, and presenting the results in minimally important difference units. We outline the merits and limitations of each alternative and provide guidance for meta-analysts and guideline developers.     

The M1 muscarinic receptor is present in situ as a ligand-regulated mixture of monomers and oligomeric complexes

The quaternary organization of rhodopsin-like G protein-coupled receptors in native tissues is unknown. To address this we generated mice in which the M₁ muscarinic acetylcholine receptor was replaced with a C-terminally monomeric enhanced green fluorescent protein (mEGFP)–linked variant. Fluorescence imaging of brain slices demonstrated appropriate regional distribution, and using both anti-M₁ and anti–green fluorescent protein antisera the expressed transgene was detected in both cortex and hippocampus only as the full-length polypeptide. M₁-mEGFP was expressed at levels equal to the M₁ receptor in wild-type mice and was expressed throughout cell bodies and projections in cultured neurons from these animals. Signaling and behavioral studies demonstrated M₁-mEGFP was fully active. Application of fluorescence intensity fluctuation spectrometry to regions of interest within M₁-mEGFP–expressing neurons quantified local levels of expression and showed the receptor was present as a mixture of monomers, dimers, and higher-order oligomeric complexes. Treatment with both an agonist and an antagonist ligand promoted monomerization of the M₁-mEGFP receptor. The quaternary organization of a class A G protein-coupled receptor in situ was directly quantified in neurons in this study, which answers the much-debated question of the extent and potential ligand-induced regulation of basal quaternary organization of such a receptor in native tissue when present at endogenous expression levels.

Measuring and understanding the extent and potential significance of quaternary organization of members of the class A (rhodopsin-like) family of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have both fascinated and frustrated researchers for many years (1, 2). Over time, a wide range of methods have been applied to address this question, and many different GPCRs have been examined. Outcomes have ranged from assertions that such receptors are monomeric and that results consistent with other conclusions reflect either artifacts of the method of measurement or that studies have been performed at nonphysiological levels of expression of the receptor being studied, to those that have suggested rather stable dimeric or tetrameric complexes (1). Only in the case of rhodopsin, the photon receptor expressed at very high levels (in the range of 24,000–30,000 molecules/µm²) in rod outer segments of the eye, have detailed studies been conducted in situ on a class A GPCR. In this example, various studies have shown that rhodopsin is organized as rows of dimers (3, 4). However, to our knowledge, no other GPCR is expressed natively at levels akin to rhodopsin. As such, although a substantial number of studies, generally performed in transfected cell lines or in artificial bilayer systems, have provided evidence that other GPCRs can and do form dimeric and/or higher-order quaternary complexes in a concentration-dependent manner (1, 2), how levels of expression required to observe such complexes relate to expression levels in native cells and tissues has been poorly defined, as is the stability of such complexes and whether they are regulated by ligand binding.Developments in fluorescence fluctuation analysis (FFA) have facilitated efforts to define the oligomeric status of transmembrane receptor proteins (5, 6). Unlike methods based on resonance energy transfer, only a single fluorophore-linked protein is required to be expressed to use FFA. It is, therefore, more practical to use such methods in native cells and tissues if linked to genome-editing approaches and/or the generation of transgenic “knock-in” animal models in which a receptor of interest is replaced with a fluorophore-tagged, modified form of the receptor. Moreover, the recent introduction of fluorescence intensity fluctuation (FIF) spectrometry (7–10) has overcome issues with other methods based on FFA that result in information being compressed due to averaging of oligomer-size data from interrogated regions of interest (RoIs) in which complex mixtures of oligomers of different sizes may be present (7, 8).To define whether the class A M₁ muscarinic acetylcholine receptor is present in hippocampal and cortical neurons as strict monomers or as a range of monomeric, dimeric, and, potentially, oligomeric complexes, we applied FIF spectrometry to images of such neurons isolated from a line of transgenic mice in which we replaced the M₁ receptor with a form of the receptor that includes C-terminally linked monomeric enhanced green fluorescent protein (mEGFP). We first show that both expression levels and function of the introduced M₁-mEGFP construct appear equivalent to the native M₁ receptor in wild-type (WT) mice, using a range of methods and measures ranging from [³H]ligand binding and cell signaling assays to locomotion. We then demonstrate in hippocampal and cortical neurons that in the basal state, the M₁-mEGFP construct is present as a mixture of monomers and dimeric or oligomeric complexes. We also show that the presence of either an agonist or an antagonist ligand promotes monomerization of the receptor. In these studies, we combined analysis of images of a fluorophore-modified receptor in situ with calculation of receptor oligomer complexity. The studies provide a clear and unambiguous answer to a long-standing question that has been the subject of considerable debate (11–13) but that has previously been restricted to studies performed on transfected cell lines. Moreover, these studies are a model for subsequent studies for researchers who plan to explore the topic of dimerization of rhodopsin-family GPCRs.     

Evaluation of in-stent stenosis by magnetic resonance phase-velocity mapping in nickel-titanium stents

PURPOSE: To evaluate different grades of in-stent stenosis in a nickel-titanium stent with MRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Magnetic resonance phase velocity mapping (MR-PVM) was used to measure flow velocity through a 9-mm NiTi stent with three different degrees of stenosis in a phantom study. The tested stenotic geometries were 1) axisymmetric 75%, 2) axisymmetric 90%, and 3) asymmetric 50%. The MR-PVM data were subsequently compared with the velocities from computational fluid dynamic (CFD) simulations of identical conditions. RESULTS: Good quantitative agreement in velocity distribution for the 50% and 75% stenoses was observed. The agreement was poor for the 90% stenosis, most likely due to turbulence and the high-velocity gradients found in the small luminal area relative to the pixel resolution in our imaging settings. CONCLUSION: The accuracy of the MRI velocities inside the stented area renders MRI a modality that may be used to assess moderate to severe in-stent restenosis (ISR) in medium-sized vascular stents in peripheral vessels, such as the iliac, carotid, and femoral arteries. Advances in MR instrumentation may provide sufficient resolution to obtain adequate velocity information from smaller vessels, such as the coronary arteries, and allow MRI to substitute for invasive and expensive catheterization procedures currently in clinical use.