Iron as a co-morbid factor in nonhemochromatotic liver disease.

Heavy iron overload, in both primary and secondary hemochromatosis, may cause fibrosis of parenchymal organs, especially the liver. The toxicity of iron is believed to involve increased oxidative stress, with iron-catalyzed production of reactive oxygen species causing oxidative damage to lipids, proteins, and nucleic acids. Lesser degrees of hepatic iron deposition are also associated with, and seem to be risk factors for, certain nonhemochromatotic liver diseases. Porphyria cutanea tarda is associated with hepatic iron overload and responds to iron-reduction therapy. Results of recent studies have demonstrated high prevalences (about 60%-80%) of HFE gene mutations in patients with porphyria cutanea tarda. Chronic hepatitis C is another risk factor for porphyria cutanea tarda. Other recent evidence indicates that the prevalence of HFE gene mutations is increased in chronic viral hepatitis and that patients with chronic hepatitis C harboring especially the C282Y mutation are more likely to suffer from advanced hepatic fibrosis or cirrhosis and to do so at younger ages. A role for modest iron overload in increasing severity of alcohol-induced liver disease has been well established from results of experimental studies. However, it is currently unresolved whether mild-to-moderate hepatic iron deposition or heterozygosity for the C282Y mutation plays a role in human alcoholic liver disease or in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease or nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. There is persuasive evidence that iron reduction decreases insulin resistance, and it likely also decreases oxidative stress, two key pathogenic features of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease/nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Iron loading has also been described after portosystemic shunts and in end-stage liver disease.     

Iron and HFE or TfR1 mutations as comorbid factors for development and progression of chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Recent evidence implicates iron as a comorbid factor for development of non-hemochromatotic liver diseases. Mutations or polymorphisms in the HFE gene or the TfR1 gene may influence the accumulation of iron in the liver or other tissues or may influence chronic viral hepatitis apart from effects on iron homeostasis. The aim of this study was to assess the role of hepatic iron, HFE and TfR1 variations on development and progression of chronic hepatitis C infection. METHODS: We studied 119 consecutive patients with chronic hepatitis C, correlating clinical, laboratory, histopathological, and genetic data. Frequencies of genetic variations were compared with local and national controls. RESULTS: HFE mutations were more common in patients than controls (48% vs. 38%, P=0.04), and advanced degrees of fibrosis developed at younger ages in subjects with the C282Y mutation (38.6 vs. 46.5 years, P=0.03). Patients carrying C282Y had higher mean hepatic iron concentrations (P=0.02), hepatic iron indices (P<=0.0001), and hepatic fibrosis scores (P=0.01). Hepatic fibrosis was correlated with hepatic iron concentration (P=0.03). TfR1 polymorphisms bore no detectable relation to disease severity or response to therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Hepatic iron and HFE mutations are comorbid factors that increase development and progression of chronic hepatitis C.     

Mechanism of iron potentiation of hepatic uroporphyria: studies in cultured chick embryo liver cells

Effects of iron were studied in cultured chick embryo liver cells to help elucidate the effect of hepatic iron in the human disease porphyria cutanea tarda and in toxic porphyria caused by chemicals. These cultures have proven useful because (a) phenobarbital and phenobarbital-like drugs induce a common form(s) of cytochrome P-450 (P-450-phenobarbital) in these cultures; (b) 20-methylcholanthrene and certain other polycyclic hydrocarbons induce a different form(s) (P-450-methylchol-anthrene), and (c) uroporphyria can be produced rapidly by exposure to suitable chemicals. In these cultures, treatment with iron alone did not produce porphyrin accumulation, and treatment with iron + 5-aminolevulinate caused accumulation of protoporphyrin, as did treatment with 5-aminolevulinate alone. However, treatment with phenobarbital-like drugs and iron, the latter at a concentration as low as 0.2 microM, led to accumulation of uro- and heptacarboxylporphyrins. Potentiation of uroporphyrin accumulation by iron began before there was a detectable synergistic increase in activity of 5-aminolevulinate synthase, the rate-controlling enzyme of heme synthesis. In contrast, treatment of cultures with 20-methylcholanthrene, in the presence or absence of iron, did not result in uroporphyrin accumulation or an increase in the activity of 5-aminolevulinate synthase. Uroporphyrinogen decarboxylase activity was unchanged by drug and iron treatments. Inhibitors of P-450-phenobarbital, SKF525A and piperonyl butoxide, as well as cadmium and cycloheximide prevented the porphyrin accumulation produced by glutethimide + iron, even though, except with cycloheximide, these substances further increased 5-aminolevulinate synthase activity. In vitro, uroporphyrin was oxidized autocatalytically by iron. In intact hepatocytes, even low concentrations of iron (0.2 to 20 microM), in the presence of a form of cytochrome P-450 induced by phenobarbital-like chemicals, produces uroporphyria primarily by enhancing uroporphyrinogen oxidation, not by inhibition of the decarboxylase. Induction of 5-aminolevulinate synthase amplifies the porphyrin overproduction.     

Impact of disease severity on outcome of antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis C: Lessons from the HALT-C trial

In patients with chronic hepatitis C, advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis are associated with lower rates of sustained virologic response (SVR) to interferon (IFN)-based therapy. In this study, we assessed virologic response to retreatment with peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin (RBV), as a function of the baseline fibrosis score (Ishak staging) and platelet count, in 1,046 patients enrolled in the Hepatitis C Antiviral Long-term Treatment against Cirrhosis (HALT-C) Trial. All patients had failed prior treatment with IFN or peginterferon +/- RBV and had Ishak fibrosis scores > or = 3. Four groups of patients with increasingly severe liver disease were compared: (A) bridging fibrosis (Ishak 3 and 4) with platelet counts >125,000/mm3 (n = 559); (B) bridging fibrosis with platelet counts < or =125,000/mm3 (n = 96); (C) cirrhosis (Ishak 5 and 6) with platelet counts >125,000/mm3 (n = 198); and (D) cirrhosis with platelet counts < or =125,000/mm3 (n = 193). SVR rates were 23%, 17%, 10%, and 9% in groups A, B, C, and D, respectively (P < .0001 for trend). Reduction in SVR as a function of increasingly severe disease was independent of age, percent African American, HCV genotype, HCV level, and type of prior therapy. Dose reduction lowered SVR frequencies, but to a lesser extent than disease severity. By logistic regression, cirrhosis (P < .0001) was the major determinant that impaired virologic response, independent of dose reduction or platelet count. In conclusion, disease severity is a major independent determinant of rate of SVR in patients with advanced chronic hepatitis C. New strategies are needed to optimize antiviral therapy in these "difficult-to-cure" patients.     

Hepatitis C virus-specific immune responses and quasi-species variability at baseline are associated with nonresponse to antiviral therapy during advanced hepatitis C

Pretreatment hepatitis C virus (HCV)-specific lymphoproliferative (LP) responses, neutralizing antibody (NA) responses, intrahepatic cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) responses, and HCV quasi-species (QS) diversity and complexity were examined in patients with advanced hepatic fibrosis (Ishak fibrosis score of > or = 3) and prior nonresponse to interferon (IFN)- alpha therapy who were enrolled in the initial phase of the Hepatitis C Antiviral Long-Term Treatment against Cirrhosis Trial. Positive baseline HCV E1- and/or E2-specific NA responses (P = .01) and higher baseline HCV QS diversity (P = .01) were more commonly found in patients who did not become sustained virologic responders (SVRs) at week 72 (W72) than they were in those who did. No patients with positive results for both the LP and NA assays achieved a sustained virologic response. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that, when the presence of cirrhosis, prior ribavirin therapy, genotype 1 infection, log serum HCV RNA level, and receipt of >80% of the prescribed medication were controlled for, a sustained virologic response (W72) was negatively correlated with positive baseline LP assay results (P = .02) and with 1 or more positive assays (LP, NA, or CTL) (P = .02). No differences were noted in baseline intrahepatic CTL activity between SVRs and non-SVRs. Thus, in patients with advanced hepatic fibrosis due to HCV infection, pretreatment HCV-specific immune responses and increased QS variability appear to hinder viral clearance by pegylated IFN- alpha 2a and ribavirin combination therapy.     

Enhanced phenotypic expression of alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency in an mz heterozygote with chronic hepatitis c

A middle-aged white man of Scotch-Irish ancestry, being treated for chronic hepatitis C, was found to be heterozygous for α1-antitrypsin deficiency (PiMZ phenotype) after diagnostic PAS-positive, diastase-resistant globules were detected in a liver biopsy. The globules had not been present in a biopsy obtained 4 yr previously. He was also found to be heterozygous for the cys282tyr mutation of the HFE gene, which is the chief cause of HLA-linked hereditary hemochromatosis (HHC). His liver disease progressed over 4 yr from mild hepatitis to moderate hepatitis with cirrhosis despite therapy with interferon-α, and phlebotomy plus interferon. These conditions appeared to have synergistic effects, with the chronic viral hepatitis unmasking the α1AT deficiency, and the α1AT deficiency (and possibly the heterozygosity for HHC), exacerbating the course of the hepatitis C.     

Association of filamin A and vimentin with hepatitis C virus proteins in infected human hepatocytes

Chronic hepatitis C (CHC) infection caused by hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a major cause of liver disease and remains a major therapeutic challenge. A variety of host proteins interact with HCV proteins. The definitive role of cytoskeletal (CS) proteins in HCV infection remains to be determined. In this study, our aim was to determine the expression profile of differentially regulated and expressed selected CS proteins and their association with HCV proteins in infected hepatocytes as possible therapeutic targets. Using proteomics, qRT-PCR, Western blot and immunofluorescence techniques, we revealed that filamin A (fila) and vimentin (vim) were prominently increased proteins in HCV-expressing human hepatoma cells compared with parental cells and in liver biopsies from patients with CHC vs controls. HCV nonstructural (NS) 3 and NS5A proteins were associated with fila, while core protein partially with fila and vim. Immunoprecipitation showed interactions among fila and NS3 and NS5A proteins. Cells treated with interferon-α showed a dose- and time-dependent decrease in CS and HCV proteins. NS proteins clustered at the perinuclear region following cytochalasin b treatment, whereas disperse cytoplasmic and perinuclear distribution was observed in the no-treatment group. This study demonstrates and signifies that changes occur in the expression of CS proteins in HCV-infected hepatocytes and, for the first time, shows the up-regulation and interaction of fila with HCV proteins. Association between CS and HCV proteins may have implications in future design of CS protein-targeted therapy for the treatment for HCV infection.     

Hepatitis B and liver transplantation: Molecular and clinical features that influence recurrence and outcome

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) continues to be a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. It is estimated that about 350 million people throughout the world are chronically infected with HBV. Some of these people will develop hepatic cirrhosis with decompensation and/or hepatocellular carcinoma. For such patients, liver transplantation may be the only hope for cure or real improvement in quality and quantity of life. Formerly, due to rapidity of recurrence of HBV infection after liver transplantation, usually rapidly progressive, liver transplantation was considered to be contraindicated. This changed dramatically following the demonstration that hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG), could prevent recurrent HBV infection. HBIG has been the standard of care for the past two decades or so. Recently, with the advent of highly active inhibitors of the ribose nucleic acid polymerase of HBV (entecavir, tenofovir), there has been growing evidence that HBIG needs to be given for shorter lengths of time; indeed, it may no longer be necessary at all. In this review, we describe genetic variants of HBV and past, present, and future prophylaxis of HBV infection during and after liver transplantation. We have reviewed the extant medical literature on the subject of infection with the HBV, placing particular emphasis upon the prevention and treatment of recurrent HBV during and after liver transplantation. For the review, we searched PubMed for all papers on the subject of “hepatitis B virus AND liver transplantation”. We describe some of the more clinically relevant and important genetic variations in the HBV. We also describe current practices at our medical centers, provide a summary and analysis of comparative costs for alternative strategies for prevention of recurrent HBV, and pose important still unanswered questions that are in need of answers during the next decade or two. We conclude that it is now rational and cost-effective to decrease and, perhaps, cease altogether, the routine use of HBIG during and following liver transplantation for HBV infection. Here we propose an individualized prophylaxis regimen, based on an integrated approach and risk-assessment.