Prekallikrein-Kallikrein conversion rate as a predictor of contrast material catastrophies

An in vitro is described that attempts to detect patients with a potential for adverse systemic reactions to contrast material. This test involves measuring the rate of conversion of prekallikrein to kallikrein under certain standard conditions. In a preliminary retrospective study, the test could be used to identify such patients with a sensitivity of 88%, a specificity of 82%, and a predictive value of 79%.     

Using Standardized Oral Examinations to Evaluate General Competencies

Emergency medicine residency programs are required by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) to formally evaluate each resident with oral and written examinations. The Michigan State University Emergency Medicine Residency Program in Lansing conducts monthly standardized oral examinations (SOEs) as part of each resident's evaluation. Recently, the ACGME has advanced six areas, termed "general competencies," that should be acquired during graduate medical education. According to the ACGME, these competencies should be included in the educational process of all residency programs. In promulgating these competencies, the ACGME did not provide examples of core content, strategies for implementation, or methods of evaluation; rather, individual residency programs are required to develop their own methods. The authors describe a modification of an existing SOE strategy that assesses residents' knowledge, skills, experiences, and attitudes as reflected in the general competencies.     

Gamma-knife radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia

Gamma knife was installed at the PD Hinduja National Hospital and Medical Research Centre, Mumbai, India, in January 1997. In the first year of gamma-knife radiosurgery to January 1998, we treated 110 patients, of whom six had medically refractory trigeminal neuralgia. Seven treatments were administered to this group of six patients (one had bilateral neuralgia). This report evaluates the effectiveness of radiosurgery treatment in these patients. The median age of the patients was 56 years and there were five males and one female. Following Leksell stereotactic frame fixation, a magnetic resonance imaging scan was done in all. The Leksell gamma plan was used for planning. A radiosurgery dose of 70–80 Gy was delivered to the trigeminal root entry zone, 2–4 mm anterior to the junction of the pons and trigeminal nerve with a single 4 mm collimator helmet. Complete pain relief was achieved in four patients. Two had partial relief. No patient developed any radiosurgery related morbidity during the follow-up period of 5–16 months. Radiosurgery seems to be an effective approach for medically or surgically refractory trigeminal neuralgia.     

多发性大动脉炎的麻醉

０引言多发性大动脉炎尤其侵及双侧颈总动脉、双锁骨下动脉及无名动脉罕见,我院心脏外科及血管外科近日联合手术１例该病例,现简述其麻醉特点及特殊处理．１临床资料女性,３０岁,５０ｋｇ,头晕,头昏伴心悸,出汗,双上肢冰凉,麻木,查血压右上肢０／０ｋＰａ,右下...     

Solitary bronchioloalveolar carcinoma: CT criteria

The computed tomographic (CT) scans of 30 patients with solitary bronchioloalveolar carcinoma were reviewed. Common features at CT included the peripheral or subpleural location of a pulmonary mass (25 cases), pseudocavitation (18 cases), heterogeneous attenuation (17 cases), irregular margins forming a star pattern (22 cases), and pleural tags (21 cases). Using these CT criteria, four independent observers attempted to identify cases of bronchioloalveolar carcinoma from a larger sample of lung cancers and benign lesions by categorizing a series of test cases into four probability categories. Although the bronchioloalveolar carcinomas were correctly ranked in the two highest probability categories 75% of the time (in 45 of 60 cases), there was considerable overlap with other lung lesions, particularly with adenocarcinoma and large cell undifferentiated carcinoma. However, even though the typical features of bronchioloalveolar carcinoma are not invariable or highly specific, they are characteristic enough to suggest the diagnosis.     

QUADAS的制定:用于系统评价中评价诊断性研究质量的工具

背景在以系统评价为基石的循证医学时代,需要有恰当的质量评价工具。对诊断性研究的评价目前尚缺乏系统开发且经过验证的评价工具。本研究的目的是采用共识决策法整合经验证据和专家意见,制定在系统评价时用于评价原始诊断性研究质量的工具。方法按照循证原则,我们在之前发表的3篇诊断性研究文献的综述的基础上,初选出一些条目形成列表,然后通过Delphi流程逐步调整列表,形成质量评价工具。参与Delphi流程的都是诊断性研究领域的专家。结果共有9位诊断学领域的专家参与Delphi流程。经过4轮Delphi流程后,专家们对哪些条目应纳入评价工具达成共识,我们把这个评价工具命名为QUADAS。纳入条目从最初的28个减少到14个,涵盖了疾病谱、金标准、疾病进展偏倚(disease progression bias)、证实偏倚(verification bias)、评价偏倚、临床评价偏倚、合并偏倚、试验的实施、病例退出以及不确定结果。QUADAS工具中的每个条目都配有评分细则。结论本研究项目开发出了用于诊断性试验系统评价的循证质量评价工具。下一步工作是确定其适用性和有效性。