Polymorphism of the thiopurine S-methyltransferase gene in African- Americans

The molecular basis for the genetic polymorphism of thiopurine S - methyltransferase (TPMT) has been estab-lished for Caucasians, but it remains to be elucidated in African populations. In the current study, we determined TPMT genotypes in a population of 248 African-Americans and compared it with allele frequencies in 282 Caucasian Americans. TPMT genotype was determined in all individuals with TPMT activity indicative of a heterozygous genotype (</=10.1 U/ml pRBC, n = 23African- Americans, n = 21 Caucasians) and a control group with TPMT activity indicative of a homozygous wild-type genotype (>10.2 U/ml pRBC, n = 23 African-Americans, n = 21 Caucasians). No mutant alleles were found in the high activity control groups. The overall mutant allele frequencies were similar in African-Americans and Caucasians (4.6 and 3.7% of alleles, respectively). However, while TPMT*3C was the most prevalent mutant allele in African-Americans (52.2% of mutant alleles), it represented only 4.8% of mutant alleles in Caucasians ( P < 0.001). In contrast, TPMT*3A and TPMT*2 were less common in African-Americans (17.4 and 8.7% of mutant alleles), whereas TPMT*3A was the most prevalent mutant allele in Caucasians (85.7% of mutant alleles). A novel allele ( TPMT*8 ), containing a single nucleotide transition (G644A), leading to an amino acid change at codon 215 (Arg-->His), was found in one African-American with intermediate activity. These data indicate that the same TPMT mutant alleles are found in American black and white populations, but that the predominant mutant alleles differ in these two ethnic groups.      

The results of combined cataract extraction and trabeculectomy using separate incisions

A method of combined cataract extraction with posterior chamber intraocular lens and trabeculectomy using separate incisions was tested in 44 operations on 38 patients. The mean preoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) of 28.1 ± 11.7 (range 12 to 56) mmHg on maximum medication was lowered to 13.9 ± 3.4 (9 to 23) mmHg at one year, with half the eyes still requiring topical medication. The IOP was 40 mmHg or more preoperatively in eight eyes and 20 mmHg or more in only two patients at one year. There were no rises in IOP above 20 mmHg in the early postoperative period (days 1 and 2). Visual acuity was 6/9 or better in 27 and 6/12 in three eyes. There was an expulsive haemorrhage in one case, rupture of the posterior capsule in two eyes and a choroidal detachment in one eye, but no flat anterior chambers. The two-incision method allowed placement of an intraocular lens with good postoperative pressure control.     

Experimental axonopathy induced by immunization with campylobacter jejuni lipopolysaccharide from a patient with guillain‐barré syndrome

Campylobacter jejuni (C. jejunj) infection is the most common antecedent in the axonal variant of Guillain‐Barré syndrome (GBS). Antibodies against nerve gangliosides found in GBS patients recognize cross‐reactive epitopes in the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) of C. jejuni. This led to the molecular mimicry hypothesis of GBS. We immunized eleven rabbits with a LPS extracted from HS:19 C. jejuni strain isolated from a patient with GBS and complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA)(group I). In a second experiment we immunized seven rabbits with LPS, CFA and keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH)(group II). All group I rabbits developed high titers of anti‐LPS, anti‐GM1, anti‐GD1b antibodies and lower titers of anti‐GD1a. One rabbit, 50 days after initial inoculation, showed tremor and weakness. All rabbits of group II developed high titres of antiganglioside antibodies and six animals showed weakness 59–113 days after initial inoculation. Two rabbits died. Pathology showed mild to moderate, tendentially grouped, axonal degeneration in sciatic nerves of four out of five animals. Control rabbits of group I (immunized with CFA only) did not develop antibodies, controls of group II (immunized with CFA + KLH) developed low titers of IgG anti‐GM1. None developed neurological signs or showed axonal degeneration. C. jejuni LPS is a potent B‐cell stimulator capable to induce a strong antiganglioside response in rabbits. However, to induce the neuropathy is crucial to employ KLH, a glycoprotein known to stimulate both humoral and cellular responses. This animal model reproduces the pathogenetic process hypothesized in axonal GBS with antiganglioside antibodies post C. jejuni infection.     

Intriguing issues of EGFR targeting in head and neck cancer

We have read the recent comprehensive review by Cruz et al.[1] regarding the targeting of receptor tyrosine kinases andtheir therapeutic perspectives in head and neck squamous cellcarcinomas (HNSCC). The major focus of this report was epidermalgrowth factor receptor (EGFR) biology and targeting. However,we feel     

Myelin thickenings in val 102/fs null mutation of MPZ gene

Painful sensory neuropathies consist of a wide range of neuropathies that can involve large as well as small nerve fibres. Even if most cases remain of unknown cause, some of them may be associated with an underlying disorder such as diabetes, HIV, infections, amyloidosis, and Sjogren's syndrome. Since in some cases an autoimmune mechanism has been postulated, we investigated a panel of circulating autoantibodies including anti‐gliadin (AGA), anti‐endomysium (EmA), anti‐transglutaminase (tTGA) and anti‐nuclear (ANA) antibodies in the sera of patients with unexplained painful sensory neuropathies in order to identify other potentially treatable disorders. We tested the sera of 10 patients (4M; 6F) previously investigated for other causes of neuropathies, including anti‐nerve, onconeural, anti‐extractable nuclear, anti‐neutrophil cytoplasmic, anti‐thyroglobulin (TgA) and anti‐peroxidase (TPOA) antibodies. We found the presence of AGA positivity in 4 patients (40%), ANA in 7 (70%) and AGA + ANA in 4 (40%), two of whom were negative for celiac disease by gastrointestinal biopsy. None of the patients had EmA positivity. Three (30%) had TgA and TPOA and none had anti‐nerve or onconeural antibodies. Whether the presence of circulating autoantibodies in patients with unexplained painful neuropathy reflects an autoimmune involvement which may be amenable to immune therapy and not only to symptomatic treatment remains to be established.     

Ecstasy cannot be assumed to be 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDMA)

LINKED ARTICLES

This is a rebuttal by the authors (Green et al., pp. 1523–1536 of this issue) to a commentary by Parrott, pp. 1518–1520 of this issue. To view the article by Green et al. visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01819.x. To view the commentary by Parrott visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.2012.01941.xWe thank Prof Parrott (Parrott 2012) for his interest in our review (Green et al., 2012). Our main aim was to discuss the problems that arise in interpreting data obtained when administering 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) to experimental animals in terms of possible clinical consequences and vice versa, not to disparage the evidence that Ecstasy is neurotoxic in humans. We presented evidence that the pharmacokinetics of MDMA in rats and primates are fundamentally different from the pharmacokinetics of the drug in humans. Because the plasma half-life of the drug in rats is 10 times shorter than in humans, the acute adverse events in rats may be minimal compared with those in humans, and this includes body temperature and endocrine changes. Conversely, the rapid metabolism of the drug in rats to form neurotoxic metabolites may result in more severe long-term effects in that species than those that may occur in humans.We had no intention of suggesting that there was no evidence for some recreational Ecstasy users presenting with evidence of 5-HT neurotoxicity, albeit it is clear from the literature that some of this evidence remains open to several interpretations. What we did claim was that pure 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) taken alone was unlikely to cause 5-HT neurotoxicity in man. Here we must emphasize the term MDMA, as it is crucial to our discussion. Parrott, in contrast, uses the term ‘Ecstasy/MDMA’ several times when discussing neurotoxicity (Parrott, 2012). This association of Ecstasy with MDMA is one of the major problems of translation that we addressed. The Ecstasy tablet that most recreational users buy and ingest is not necessarily MDMA. Indeed, in many cases, it clearly is not. The tablet is often adulterated with other compounds, and one investigation identified no less than 14 substances other than MDMA in Ecstasy tablets, which users nevertheless presumably believed contained only MDMA (Vogels et al., 2009). Many of the adulterants identified were also psychoactive and included compounds structurally related to MDMA such as 3,4-methylenedioxyethylamphetamine and 2-methylamino-1-(3,4-methylenedioxyphenyl)butane, which have poorly researched pharmacology and toxicology. In addition, most recreational users of Ecstasy also knowingly ingest other psychoactive compounds such as alcohol and cannabis. Alcohol, for example, alters the pharmacokinetics of MDMA (Hamida et al., 2009). While, as Parrott states, clinical studies have attempted to allow for these confounding factors in any examination of the physical and psychological effects of MDMA in humans, such analysis is always limited not only by the other compounds the evaluators are unaware of, but also drugs perhaps not even considered to be relevant by the user and therefore not disclosed. It is unlikely that coffee and ‘energy drinks’ such as Red Bull are always disclosed, but there is now good preclinical evidence that caffeine, which incidentally has also been found as an adulterant in Ecstasy tablets, enhances both the hyperthermia and neurotoxicity induced in rats by MDMA (Camarasa et al., 2006; Vanattou-Saïfoudine et al., 2010). And this brings us to the crux of the problem and weakness of all the clinical data cited by Parrott (2012). A basic tenet of all good clinical pharmacology is accurate knowledge of the doses administered, frequency of administration and any confounding factors such as other drugs being consumed. None of these data are available with any precision in the clinical studies quoted. Of course one has some indication as to dose (although as Vogels et al., (2009) reported, the dose contained in illicitly obtained tablets is highly variable) and frequency of drug ingestion, but this information is generally obtained from the user whose recall is likely to be limited or who decides to obfuscate. Crucially, the information can never take into account the problem of drug tablet adulteration. The fact that hair or urine samples detect MDMA merely shows the user has consumed the drug, not how much or when or what other drugs were taken concurrently.We never suggested that MDMA exposure was not going to be associated with physical or psychological change. However such changes are not necessarily associated with long-term neurotoxic damage. We have shown that long-term behavioural effects can occur in rats both with and without 5-HT neurotoxicity (Fone et al., 2002; Bull et al., 2003; Rodsiri et al., 2011). It is interesting that Parrott approvingly quotes the Verheyden et al. (2003) study in support of his contention that neurotoxic damage has occurred. Because this study noted that the majority of persons reporting chronic psychiatric problems reported ‘improved mental health’ after quitting the drug, this surely allows us to conclude that the drug had produced subacute changes rather than any that could be associated with long-term neurotoxic damage.A further limitation to any clinical study is that one cannot perform prospective studies with the aim of investigating whether long-term neurotoxic events occur, so weaknesses arise with regard to any psychological abnormalities observed. Are persons with high risk of psychiatric problems more likely to misuse the drug, or does the drug induce changes in high-risk individuals? If high risk also happened to be associated with 5-HT abnormalities in the brains, then any conclusion that MDMA has induced neurotoxicity is spurious.We most certainly did not suggest that MDMA acted as a neurotoxin only under conditions of severe hyperthermia as is stated by Parrot in his sixth paragraph (Parrott, 2012). We have been involved in many studies on the effects of MDMA on body temperature in rats (see Docherty and Green, 2010) including one that demonstrated that neurotoxicity can occur in the absence of hyperthermia (O''Shea et al., 1998) and another that showed that hyperthermia worsens neurotoxic damage (Green et al., 2004). In our review, what we did propose was that because of the very different pharmacokinetics of MDMA in rats and humans, it is probable that humans would suffer serious or fatal adverse events at plasma levels below those likely to be required to induce 5-HT neurotoxicity.We emphasize again that we are not denying the clinical observations reviewed by Parrott, but conclude that the effects seen cannot be ascribed solely to the effects of MDMA, as he seems to be proposing. We also repeat our contention that MDMA in combination with other drugs may induce neurotoxicity and this could be said to be supported by the clinical studies quoted by Parrott.Finally, we can but assume that Parrott concurs with our principal conclusion that ‘the doses currently being used to investigate the possible therapeutic benefits of MDMA are unlikely to produce any severe acute or importantly any long-term neurotoxic damage in the human brain’ as he used such a dose (100 mg or approximately 1.4 mg·kg ⁻¹) in one of his recent studies in human volunteers (Parrott et al., 2011).     

Disorders of perfusion of the anterior segment of the eye

Background: We have investigated the vascular perfusion of a wide variety of conditions of the anterior segment using fluorescein angiography.
Methods: The conditions were classified and findings reported according to the system set out below. Patients underwent full ocular examination. Fluorescein angiography of the anterior segment was carried out when indicated to investigate iris atrophy and neovascularisation. Specular microscopy of the corneal endothelium was used to detect changes in this tissue.
Results: The hypoperfusion was variable in degree and accompanied by varying degrees of iris hypoplasia and atrophy with neovascularisation. The degree of neovascularisation depended upon its rapidity of development, the pre-existing state of vascular perfusion and the underlying pathological condition.
Conclusions: Hypoperfusion with resultant ischaemia and neovascularisation is common in conditions of the anterior segment. An understanding of the changes is valuable in treating many conditions affecting the anterior segment. The changes observed may also occur elsewhere in the physical system and may be a significant part of the ageing process, either as scattered, disparate processes or as part of a general disease process.