Over expression of brain and acute leukemia,cytoplasmic and ETS-related gene is associated with poor outcome in acute myeloid leukemia

The high expression of brain and acute leukemia, cytoplasmic (BAALC) and ETS-related gene (ERG) has been reported to influence the outcome in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), but due to limited prospective studies, their role as prognostic factors is unclear. At diagnosis, the prognostic value of BAALC and ERG expression with respect to other cytogenetic and molecular markers was analyzed in 149 AML patients. Patients were divided into quartiles which resulted in the formation of four groups (G1–G4) based on expression values of BAALC and ERG and clinical response defined across groups. Groups with similar survival probabilities were merged together and categorized subsequently as high versus low expressers. Patients with high BAALC and ERG expression had significantly lower overall survival (OS; BAALC: p = 0.001 at 5 years 29.4% vs. 69.8%; ERG: p < 0.0001 at 5 years 4% vs. 50.4%) and disease-free survival (BAALC: p = 0.001 at 5 years 19.5% vs. 69.8%; ERG: p < 0.0001 at 5 years 4.2% vs. 47%). Patients were further stratified combining BAALC and ERG expression in an integrative prognostic risk score (IPRS). After a median follow-up of 54 months (95% CI 45–63 months) among survivors, IPRS for high versus low expressers was a significant predictor for OS (BAALC + ERG: 4% vs. 71.6%, p < 0.0001) and DFS (BAALC + ERG: 4.5% vs. 74.1%, p < 0.0001). In a multivariate model, IPRS of BAALC + ERG expression retained prognostic significance for OS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.96, 95%CI 1.91–4.59, p < 0.001) and DFS (HR 3.61, 95%CI 2.26–5.76, p < 0.001).     

Targeting MYC-driven replication stress in medulloblastoma with AZD1775 and gemcitabine

Journal of Neuro-Oncology - MYC-driven medulloblastomas are highly aggressive childhood tumors with dismal outcomes and a lack of new treatment paradigms. We identified that targeting replication...     

Blood gas analysis: a study of blood loss in intensive care

This paper describes a quantitative study conducted on an intensive care unit in the north of England. It involved the collection of data from the existing records of 65 patients consecutively sampled from a predetermined date provided that they stayed more than 24 hours and had an arterial line in situ. As patient records were used, ethical approval was not necessary. The objectives of the study were to quantify the mean number of blood gas samples taken per patient and estimate the mean blood loss resulting from this, including discard volume. Limitations include reliance on records and lack of an economic evaluation. The results show that blood loss in this study was greater than that reported elsewhere. Patients who were ventilated for 24 hours or more had a statistically significant greater blood loss when compared to those who were not (P < 0.001). A subgroup of patients undergoing renal replacement therapy had the greatest blood loss (mean 55.18 ml per day). This loss was statistically significant when compared to patients not in acute renal failure (P=0.007). When patients undergoing multiple therapies normally associated with increased sampling were compared to patients not receiving such therapies, there was no statistically significant difference in blood loss. The need to change current nursing practice to reduce iatrogenic anaemia is emphasized.     

Predictive validity of the Braden Scale,Norton Scale,and Waterlow Scale in the Czech Republic

The aim of this study was to determine the predictive validity of the Braden, Norton, and Waterlow scales in 2 long‐term care departments in the Czech Republic. Assessing the risk for developing pressure ulcers is the first step in their prevention. At present, many scales are used in clinical practice, but most of them have not been properly validated yet (for example, the Modified Norton Scale in the Czech Republic). In the Czech Republic, only the Braden Scale has been validated so far. This is a prospective comparative instrument testing study. A random sample of 123 patients was recruited. The predictive validity of the pressure ulcer risk assessment scales was evaluated based on sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. The data were collected from April to August 2014. In the present study, the best predictive validity values were observed for the Norton Scale, followed by the Braden Scale and the Waterlow Scale, in that order. We recommended that the above 3 pressure ulcer risk assessment scales continue to be evaluated in the Czech clinical setting.