CYP1A1, GSTM1, and GSTT1 polymorphisms and the risk of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions in a multiethnic population

OBJECTIVE: In this investigation, we explored the hypothesis that genetic polymorphisms in the cytochrome P4501A1 (T3801C) and glutathione S-transferase classes mu and theta (GSTM1 and GSTT1) gene deletions promote the development of cervical dysplasia by moderating the activation and detoxification of polycyclic hydrocarbons and other compounds that influence oxidative stress and DNA adduct formation. METHODS: A multiethnic, case-control study of 131 women with biopsy-confirmed cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions (SIL) and 180 controls with cytologically normal cervical (Pap) smears was conducted between 1992 and 1996 in Honolulu, Hawaii. We collected in-person interviews, a blood sample to extract genomic DNA, and an exfoliated cervical cell sample to determine the presence and type of human papillomavirus (HPV) using PCR dot-blot hybridization. Genotyping for the CYP1A1 MspI allelic variant and deletion of the GSTM1 and GSTT1 gene loci followed a PCR method. RESULTS: Women who were homozygous, but not heterozygous, for the CYP1A1 MspI variant allele were at significantly increased risk of cervical SIL (odds ratio (OR) = 3.4; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.1-10.7) compared to women who were homozygous for the wild-type allele. Subjects with the GSTM1 null genotype had a nonsignificant elevated risk of cervical SIL (OR = 1.6; 95% CI = 0.8-3.0) compared to women with the gene present. No difference in the risk of cervical disease was associated with the GSTT1 null genotype. The combination of the CYP1A1 homozygous variant and the GSTM1 null genotypes increased the odds ratio for cervical SIL to 5.1 (95% CI = 1.3-20.7). There was no evidence for an interaction between genotype and exposure to tobacco smoke, alcohol drinking, or HPV DNA positivity. CONCLUSIONS: These findings, although based on a small number of subjects, suggest that the CYP1A1 MspI polymorphism may be a susceptibility factor for early, premalignant changes in the cervical epithelium.     

Loss of heterozygosity for chromosome 14q in neuroblastoma

BACKGROUND: Neuroblastoma is a genetically heterogeneous disease, with subsets of tumors demonstrating rearrangements of several genomic regions. Preliminary studies from several groups have identified loss of heterozygosity (LOH) for the long arm of chromosome 14 (14q) in 20-25% of primary neuroblastomas. PROCEDURE: To determine precisely the frequency and extent of 14q deletions, we performed LOH analysis for a large series of primary neuroblastomas using a panel of 11 highly polymorphic markers. RESULTS: LOH was detected in 83 of 372 tumors (22%). Although the majority of tumors with allelic loss demonstrated allelic loss for all informative markers, 13 cases showed LOH for only a portion of 14q. A single consensus region of deletion, which was shared by all tumors with 14q LOH, was defined within 14q23-q32 between D14S588 and the 14q telomere. Allelic loss for 14q was strongly correlated with the presence of 11q LOH (P < 0.001 ) and inversely correlated with MYCN amplification (P= 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: LOH for 14q was evident in all clinical risk groups, indicating that this abnormality may be a universal feature of neuroblastoma tumor development. These findings suggest that a tumor suppressor gene involved in the initiation or progression of neuroblastoma is located within distal 14q.     

Comparison of specific antibody, D-Phe-Pro-Arg-CH2Cl and aprotinin for prevention of in vitro effects of recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator on haemostasis parameters

In vitro, concentration-dependent effects of rt-PA on a range of coagulation and fibrinolytic assays in thawed plasma samples were investigated. In absence of a fibrinolytic inhibitor, 2 micrograms rt-PA/ml blood (3.4 micrograms/ml plasma) caused prolongation of clotting time assays and decreases of plasminogen (to 44% of the control value), fibrinogen (to 27%), alpha 2-antiplasmin (to less than 5%), FV (to 67%), FVIII (to 41%) and FXIII (to 16%). Of three inhibitors tested, a specific polyclonal anti-rt-PA antibody prevented interferences in all fibrinolytic and most clotting assays. D-Phe-Pro-Arg-CH2Cl (PPACK) enabled correct assays of fibrinogen and fibrinolytic parameters but interfered with coagulometric assays dependent on endogenous thrombin generation. Aprotinin was suitable only for a restricted range of both assay types. Most in vitro effects were observed only with rt-PA plasma concentrations in excess of therapeutic values. Nevertheless it is concluded that for clinical application, collection of blood samples on either specific antibody or PPACK is essential for a correct assessment of in vivo effects of rt-PA on the haemostatic system in patients undergoing fibrinolytic therapy.     

Bacterial contamination of platelet concentrates: results of a prospective multicenter study comparing pooled whole blood-derived platelets and apheresis platelets

BACKGROUND: The GERMS Group initiated a prospective multicenter study to assess prevalence and nature of bacterial contamination of pooled buffy-coat platelet concentrates (PPCs) and apheresis platelet concentrates (APCs) by routine screening with a bacterial culture system. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In nine centers overall, 52,243 platelet (PLT) concentrates (15,198 APCs, 37,045 PPCs) were analyzed by aerobic and anaerobic cultures (BacT/ALERT, bioMérieux). RESULTS: In 135 PLT concentrates (PCs; 0.26%), bacteria could be identified in the first culture (0.4% for APCs vs. 0.2% for PPCs; p < 0.001). In 37 (0.07%) of these PC units, the same bacteria strain could be identified in a second culture from the sample bag and/or the PC unit. The rate of confirmed-positive units did not differ significantly between APC (0.09%; 1/1169) and PPC units (0.06%; 1/1544). Bacteria from skin flora (Propionibacterium acnes, Staphylococcus epidermidis) were the most prevalent contaminants. Median times to first positive culture from start of incubation were 0.7 and 3.7 days in aerobic and anaerobic cultures for confirmed-positive units. With a "negative-to-date" issue strategy, most PC units (55%) had already been issued by time of the first positive culture. CONCLUSION: The rate of confirmed bacterial contamination of PC units was low. Nevertheless, clinicians must be aware of this risk. The risk of bacterial contamination does not warrant universal preference of APCs. It must be questioned whether routine bacterial screening by a culture method can sufficiently prevent contaminated products from being transfused due to the delay until a positive signal in the culture system and due to false-negative results.     

Comparison of three bacterial detection methods under routine conditions

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Since 2004, bacterial screening of platelets has been required in the USA and is also done on a voluntary basis in many European countries. The German Red Cross blood donor services conducted a prospective multicentre study in order to investigate the prevalence of bacterially contaminated pool platelet concentrates and apheresis platelet concentrates. This substudy compares three different bacterial detection systems. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Platelet concentrates were tested in parallel with BacT/ALERT, Scansystem and Pall eBDS (n = 6307) in pool platelets. Apheresis platelets were tested in parallel with BacT/ALERT and Pall eBDS (n = 4730). All initially positive results were evaluated by a standardized procedure including evaluation by a microbiology reference laboratory. RESULTS: One in 6307 pool platelets were confirmed positive by BacT/ALERT, whereas Pall eBDS and Scansystem failed to detect these samples. Only three samples were initially reactive with Pall eBDS without proof of any bacteria strains. The rate of false-positive results was substantially higher for BacT/ALERT (0.25%, 28 in 11,037 tested samples) than for eBDS (0.03%, 3 in 11 037 tested samples) or Scansystem (0.0%, 0 in 6307 tested samples). Three of 4730 apheresis platelets were confirmed positive by BacT/ALERT. These were negative with Pall eBDS. CONCLUSION: Sensitivity was best for BacT/ALERT, whereas specificity was enhanced for Pall eBDS and Scansystem. Scansystem required specially trained staff, whereas BacT/ALERT and Pall eBDS were easy, quick, user-friendly and objective methods.