Accuracy of single-time, multilevel registration in image-guided spinal surgery.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Computerized frameless stereotactic image-guidance has been used in recent years to improve the accuracy and safety of pedicle screw placement during spine surgery. Because the possibility of intervertebral motion exists, and because the patient is usually in a different position when preoperative imaging is performed compared with the operative position, it has been suggested that the imaging model of the complete lumbar spine and the surgically exposed lumbar spine may be significantly discordant. Consequently, current protocols suggest registering each spinal level (single-level registration) separately before pedicle screw placement at that level, a time-consuming process. PURPOSE: To assess the accuracy of single-time multilevel registration for multilevel pedicle screw placement during image-guided, computer-assisted spine surgery, in the setting of degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: This is a prospective clinical and radiological study of 45 patients with degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine who underwent instrumented fusion with the use of single-time multilevel registration computer-assisted, image-guided tomography. The accuracy of the pedicle screws placement was confirmed on the basis of a protocol that included intraoperative spontaneous electromyographic (EMG) recordings, direct pedicle visualization, and computer tomography (CT) scans when clinically indicated during the follow-up period. PATIENT SAMPLE: Forty-five consecutive patients who fulfilled the criteria of computer-assisted, image-guided tomography pedicle screw placement for degenerative lumbar spine disease without overt instability. OUTCOME MEASURES: The principal outcome measure was the accuracy of pedicle screw placement with single-time multilevel registration for multilevel pedicle screw placement during image-guided, computer-assisted spine surgery; postoperative CT performed for clinical indications during the follow-up course was used for the assessment of pedicle screw placement. METHODS: Patients were assessed clinically before and after the operation. Data from 45 consecutive cases of image-guided, computer-assisted lumbar spinal fusion were statistically analyzed to determine the relationship between the number of levels registered during single-time registry and the mean registration error (MRE). Intraoperative spontaneous EMG, direct visualization, and postoperative CT scans were used to assess the accuracy of pedicle screw insertion. RESULTS: None of the patients involved in this study experienced clinical sequelae of improper pedicle screw placement. MREs after surface mapping and after point merge were small (less than 1.00 mm and less than 3.00 mm, respectively). During the intraoperative assessment of the pedicle screws placement, no significant spontaneous EMG activity was recorded and the pedicular walls were found intact in direct visualization. The postoperative CT scans showed in 10 patients accurate placement in 55 of the 57 pedicle screws with expansion of the medial wall in two screws. CONCLUSIONS: Single-time, multilevel registration may decrease operative time relative to repeated, single-level registrations, without compromising the increased accuracy of pedicle screw placement afforded by this technique in the setting of degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine. Despite the advantages in computer-guided image surgery, cautious application in the individual patient is recommended until more comprehensive data can be gathered in specific degenerative pathology with overt instability; thus the knowledge of the anatomy remains crucial.     

Comparison of near heterophoria tests under varying conditions on an adult sample

PURPOSE: This study compared the near phoria measurement using the Bernell muscle balance card with and without prism neutralization, using both trial frame and phoropter correction, and compared with the conventional Maddox rod method. METHODS: Forty young normal Chinese adults had their near phoria measured with trial frame correction using the conventional muscle balance card method (method 1). Any deviation was compensated with a prism bar as an alternative approach (method 2). The conventional Maddox rod method (method 3) was also carried out for comparison. These three methods were repeated with phoropter correction and considered as methods 4, 5 and 6. RESULTS: The phorias obtained from these six methods were not significantly different from each other (repeated measures anova, p > 0.05). More than half of the subjects were exophoric. Although the difference in phoria was not significant, phoria measurement using phoropter correction yielded a greater coefficient of variation. CONCLUSIONS: Near phoria measurement using the muscle balance card conducted with trial frame correction was less variable, and was also more natural and similar to a real reading situation. The use of prism for compensation did not affect the phoria results. Exophoria seems to be more common than esophoria in young Chinese adults.