The orthodontic treatment of TMD patients: EMG effects of a functional appliance

The aim of this work was to test the effects of the Function Generator Bite (FGB) on the masticatory muscles of temporomandibular joint dysfunction (TMD) subjects. Two groups were selected for the study. A group of 20 TMD patients (group F) requiring orthodontic treatment and treated with FGB and a group of 10 healthy subjects (group H) were considered. Both groups were evaluated before the therapy began (TO) and then after 18 months of therapy (T1). An electromyographic analysis of the masseter and temporalis anterior muscles and a clinical evaluation according to the Research Diagnostic Criteria for TMD (RDC/TMD) were performed. A statistical difference between the two groups was observed at TO with respect to the activity index. TMD subjects showed a lower value of the index. Further studies are necessary to fully understand the utility of this EMG index as a diagnostic indicator.     

Synovial chondromatosis of the temporomandibular joint

Synovial chondromatosis is a cartilaginous metaplasia of the mesenchymal remnants of the synovial tissue of the joints. Its main characteristic is the formation of cartilaginous nodules in the synovium and inside the articular space (loose bodies). Synovial chondromatosis mainly affects big synovial joints such as the elbow and knee and is uncommon in the temporomandibular joint. The main symptoms are pain, limitation of jaw movement, crepitation, and inflammation. Diagnosis is made by panoramic radiograph, computed tomography scan, and mainly magnetic resonance imaging. Surgery is the therapeutic choice. The authors describe their experience in the treatment and in the follow up of a patient with unilateral synovial chondromatosis.     

Autoimmune disease and the female patient

This article focuses on the pathogenesis of the gender gap of autoimmune disease. Specifically, the discussion characterizes the role of sex hormones in the immune response and a female predilection for the common diseases seen in daily practice (ie, lupus erythematosus, myasthenia gravis, and other autoimmune diseases). A comparison between the sexes, with respect to autoimmune disease mechanisms, is presented to give oral and maxillofacial surgeons a better insight as to the role of sex and successful surgical treatment outcomes in this population of patients.     

Transcervical submandibular sialoadenectomy

The submandibular glands are subject to several pathologies that require excision. The most common problem that affects these salivary glands is sialadenitis combined with sialolithiasis. This problem occurs in the submandibular gland 10 times more frequently than it does in the parotid gland. Other illnesses frequently involving the submandibular glands are represented by sialadenosis and benign, malign, and intermediate neoplasms.Diagnosis of any disturbance in the submandibular gland involves both a clinical and instrumental (echography, traditional radiography [ortopantomography] and eventually computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging) assessment. Surgery is the usual method of treatment of both chronic sialadenitis and neoplasms in the submandibular gland. A submandibular gland surgical approach can be cervical, intraoral, or endoscopic.The authors present their clinical experience with a total of 40 patients with illnesses involving the submandibular gland treated with submandibular gland excision by a transcervical approach. Their experience suggests that this approach entails a relatively simple procedure, involves low risks for the nerve structure around the gland, permits wide resection margins for neoplasms, and incurs little aesthetic damage.     

Effect on the development of ankle edema of adding delapril to manidipine in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension: a three-way crossover study

BACKGROUND: Use of the combination of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) and a calcium channel blocker (CCB) is considered a rational approach in patients whose hypertension is not controlled by monotherapy, providing better blood pressure (BP) control than the individual components with a lower incidence of adverse effects. In particular, such combinations have been found to reduce the incidence of ankle edema, the most common adverse effect of dihydropyridine annhypertensives. OBJECTIVE: The present study was undertaken to evaluate the effect on the development of ankle edema of adding the ACEI delapril to the CCB manidipine in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. METHODS: Patients between the ages of 30 and 70 years who had mild to moderate hypertension (diastolic BP [DBP] >90 and <110 mm Hg) were included in the study. After a 4-week placebo run-in period, eligible patients were randomized to receive 6 weeks each of manidipine 10 mg/d, delapril 30 mg/d, and both in a crossover fashion. There was a 2-week washout period between treatments. Ankle edema was assessed based on ankle-foot volume (AFV) and pretibial subcutaneous tissue pressure (PSTP). Sitting BP, AFV, and PSTP were measured at the end of the placebo run-in period and the end of each active-treatment period. RESULTS: The study enrolled 40 patients with previously untreated hypertension (21 women, 19 men). Both manidipine and delapril monotherapy were associated with significant reductions from baseline in systolic BP (SBP) (mean [SD], -17.3 [4] and -14.8 [4] mm Hg, respectively; both, P<0.01) and DBP (-14.6 [3] and -12.9 [3] mm Hg; both, P<0.01). Compared with monotherapy, the combination of manidipine and delapril was associated with greater reductions from baseline in SBP (-21.8 [5] mm Hg; P<0.001) and DBP (-18.6 [4] mm Hg; P<0.001). Manidipme monotherapy was associated with significant increases from baseline in both AFV (7.9%; P<0.001) and PSTP (36.6%; P<0.01). Compared with manidipine alone, the combination of manidipine and delapril was associated with less pronounced increases in AFV (3.3%; P<0.05) and PSTP (10.4%; P<0.05). Ankle edema was clinically evident in 3 patients after receipt of manidipine monotherapy and in 1 patient after receipt of combination treatment. CONCLUSION: In these patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension, the addition of delapril to manidipine partially counteracted the manidipine-induced microcirculatory changes responsible for ankle edema.