Fatal immune dysregulation due to a gain of glycosylation mutation in lymphocyte perforin

Mutations in the perforin gene (PRF1) are a common cause of the fatal immune dysregulation disorder, familial hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (type 2 FHL, FHL2). Here we report a female infant born with biallelic PRF1 mutations: a novel substitution, D49N, and a previously identified in-frame deletion, K285del. We assessed the effects of each mutation on the cytotoxicity of human NK cells in which the expression of endogenous perforin was ablated with miR30-based short hairpin (sh) RNAs. Both mutations were detrimental for function, thereby explaining the clinically severe presentation and rapidly fatal outcome. We demonstrate that D49N exerts its deleterious effect by generating an additional (third) N-linked glycosylation site, resulting in protein misfolding and degradation in the killer cell. Our data provide a rationale for treating some cases of type 2 familial hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, based on the pharmacologic inhibition or modification of glycosylation.     

18F-fluoride Positron Emission Tomography Measurements of Regional Bone Formation in Hemodialysis Patients with Suspected Adynamic Bone Disease

¹⁸F-fluoride positron emission tomography (¹⁸F-PET) allows the assessment of regional bone formation and could have a role in the diagnosis of adynamic bone disease (ABD) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The purpose of this study was to examine bone formation at multiple sites of the skeleton in hemodialysis patients (CKD5D) and assess the correlation with bone biopsy. Seven CKD5D patients with suspected ABD and 12 osteoporotic postmenopausal women underwent an ¹⁸F-PET scan, and bone plasma clearance, K _i, was measured at ten skeletal regions of interest (ROI). Fifteen subjects had a transiliac bone biopsy following double tetracycline labeling. Two CKD5D patients had ABD confirmed by biopsy. There was significant heterogeneity in K _i between skeletal sites, ranging from 0.008 at the forearm to 0.028 mL/min/mL at the spine in the CKD5D group. There were no significant differences in K _i between the two study groups or between the two subjects with ABD and the other CKD5D subjects at any skeletal ROI. Five biopsies from the CKD5D patients had single tetracycline labels only, including the two with ABD. Using an imputed value of 0.3 μm/day for mineral apposition rate (MAR) for biopsies with single labels, no significant correlations were observed between lumbar spine K _i corrected for BMAD (K _i/BMAD) and bone formation rate (BFR/BS), or MAR. When biopsies with single labels were excluded, a significant correlation was observed between K _i/BMAD and MAR (r = 0.81, p = 0.008) but not BFR/BS. Further studies are required to establish the sensitivity of ¹⁸F-PET as a diagnostic tool for identifying CKD patients with ABD.     

Better sensitivity to linear and nonlinear trends with position than with color

Useful data visualizations have the potential to leverage the visual system''s natural abilities to process and summarize simple and complex information. Here, we tested whether the design recommendations made for pairwise comparisons generalize to the detection of trends. We created two different types of graphs: line graphs and stripplots. These graphs were created from identical datasets that simulated temperature changes across time. These datasets varied in the type of trend (linear and exponential). Human observers performed a trend detection task for which they judged whether the trend in temperature over time was increasing or decreasing. Participants were more sensitive to trend direction with line graphs compared to stripplots. Participants also demonstrated a systematic bias to respond that the trend was increasing for line graphs. However, this bias decreased with increasing sensitivity. Despite the better sensitivity to line graphs, more than half of the participants found the stripplots more appealing and liked them more than the line graphs. In conclusion, our results indicate that, for trend detection, depicting data with position (line graphs) leads to better performance compared to depicting graphs with color (stripplots). Yet, graphs with color (stripplots) were preferred over the line graphs, suggesting that there may be a tradeoff between the aesthetic design of the graphs and the precision in communicating the information.     

18F‐fluoride PET as a noninvasive imaging biomarker for determining treatment efficacy of bone active agents at the hip: A prospective,randomized, controlled clinical study

The functional imaging technique of ¹⁸F‐fluoride positron emission tomography (¹⁸F‐PET) allows the noninvasive quantitative assessment of regional bone formation at any skeletal site, including the spine and hip. The aim of this study was to determine if ¹⁸F‐PET can be used as an early biomarker of treatment efficacy at the hip. Twenty‐seven treatment‐naive postmenopausal women with osteopenia were randomized to receive teriparatide and calcium and vitamin D (TPT group, n = 13) or calcium and vitamin D only (control group, n = 14). Subjects in the TPT group were treated with 20 µg/day teriparatide for 12 weeks. ¹⁸F‐PET scans of the proximal femur, pelvis, and lumbar spine were performed at baseline and 12 weeks. The plasma clearance of ¹⁸F‐fluoride to bone, K_i, a validated measurement of bone formation, was measured at four regions of the hip, lumbar spine, and pelvis. A significant increase in K_i was observed at all regions of interest (ROIs), including the total hip (+27%, p = 0.002), femoral neck (+25%, p = 0.040), hip trabecular ROI (+21%, p = 0.017), and hip cortical ROI (+51%, p = 0.001) in the TPT group. Significant increases in K_i in response to TPT were also observed at the lumbar spine (+18%, p = 0.001) and pelvis (+42%, p = 0.001). No significant changes in K_i were observed for the control group. Changes in BMD and bone turnover markers were consistent with previous trials of teriparatide. In conclusion, this is the first study to our knowledge to demonstrate that ¹⁸F‐PET can be used as an imaging biomarker for determining treatment efficacy at the hip as early as 12 weeks after initiation of therapy.