Modified subpectoral biceps tenodesis

Purpose

The proximal part of the long head of the biceps muscle has become a recognized cause of significant shoulder pain. Tenodesis of the long head of the biceps has been advocated as a treatment for pain resulting from biceps tendonopathy, biceps instability, and biceps tendon tears. All of these pathologies may be encountered during rotator cuff, SLAP or Bankart surgery, or in isolation. Several techniques have been described for this tenodesis, including various arthroscopic and subpectoral methods.

Methods

We present a modified bone bridge technique of Mazzocca et al., for subpectoral biceps tenodesis. In this technique we tenodese the tendon through two bone tunnels back over the muscle itself without implants.

Results

Application of this technique on 30 patients (ages 25–48 years) with short-term follow-up of 12–18 months showed statistically significant improvement (P value < 0.05) of the mean Constant and Oxford shoulder scores (pre-operative mean scores were 39.03 and 21.3, respectively, while postoperative mean scores were 76.43 and 44.8, respectively).

Conclusion

This technique has potential advantages as it allows the possibility of adjusting the tension of the biceps tendon before final suturing, in addition to quicker soft tissue healing.     

Novel Tools to Improve Patient Selection and Monitoring on Active Surveillance for Low-risk Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review

Context

Active surveillance (AS) is an alternative to initial radical treatment of low-risk prostate cancer (PCa). Current criteria for selection and follow-up incorrectly exclude some patients eligible for AS and misclassify some who actually harbour significant disease. Better prediction of cancer behaviour at diagnosis would allow less strict monitoring and may improve acceptance of AS.

Objective

To review and critically analyse the literature on the value of novel clinical tools for patient selection and monitoring on AS.

Evidence acquisition

A comprehensive search of the PubMed database until July 10, 2013, was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis statement guidelines. Studies assessing novel markers and diagnostics for patient selection for AS and follow-up during AS were included. Studies analysing only classic clinical parameters used in current protocols (prostate-specific antigen, prostate volume, number of (positive) prostate biopsies, percentage malignant tissue, Gleason score) were excluded. This review focuses only on the AS setting and not on predicting insignificant disease in general.

Evidence synthesis

Of 787 studies on AS, 30 were included in this review: 14 on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), 5 on serum markers, 5 on urinary markers, 4 on histopathology markers, and 2 on germline genetic markers. Several of these markers improve the prediction of tumour volume, tumour grade, or time to active treatment. MRI has a high specificity for low-risk PCa; new serum markers are associated with unfavourable disease. In none of the studies was the new marker used as the primary decision tool. Long-term outcome measures such as mortality were not assessed. The definition of indolent PCa is disputable.

Conclusions

Imaging and serum markers may improve future patient selection for AS and follow-up during AS. Prospective studies should aim to further evaluate the clinical utility of these new markers with respect to longer term outcomes of AS.

Patient summary

We searched the literature for articles reporting new ways to safely monitor low-risk prostate cancer for patients who have not had radical treatment. We found 30 articles. The most promising tools appear to be magnetic resonance imaging scans and various new blood markers. These may be used in the future within active surveillance regimens.     

Prostate Cancer Risk Inflation as a Consequence of Image-targeted Biopsy of the Prostate: A Computer Simulation Study

Background

Prostate biopsy parameters are commonly used to attribute cancer risk. A targeted approach to lesions found on imaging may have an impact on the risk attribution given to a man.

Objective

To evaluate whether, based on computer simulation, targeting of lesions during biopsy results in reclassification of cancer risk when compared with transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided biopsy.

Design, setting, and participants

A total of 107 reconstructed three-dimensional models of whole-mount radical prostatectomy specimens were used for computer simulations. Systematic 12-core TRUS biopsy was compared with transperineal targeted biopsies using between one and five cores. All biopsy strategies incorporated operator and needle deflection error. A target was defined as any lesion ≥0.2 ml. A false-positive magnetic resonance imaging identification rate of 34% was applied.

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis

Sensitivity was calculated for the detection of all cancer and clinically significant disease. Cases were designated as high risk based on achieving ≥6 mm cancer length and/or ≥50% positive cores. Statistical significance (p values) was calculated using both a paired Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and the t test.

Results and limitations

When applying a widely used biopsy criteria to designate risk, 12-core TRUS biopsy classified only 24% (20 of 85) of clinically significant cases as high risk, compared with 74% (63 of 85) of cases using 4 targeted cores. The targeted strategy reported a significantly higher proportion of positive cores (44% vs 11%; p < 0.0001) and a significantly greater mean maximum cancer core length (7.8 mm vs 4.3 mm; p < 0.0001) when compared with 12-core TRUS biopsy. Computer simulations may not reflect the sources of errors encountered in clinical practice. To mitigate this we incorporated all known major sources of error to maximise clinical relevance.

Conclusions

Image-targeted biopsy results in an increase in risk attribution if traditional criteria, based on cancer core length and the proportion of positive cores, are applied. Targeted biopsy strategies will require new risk stratification models that account for the increased likelihood of sampling the tumour.     

Focal Therapy in Prostate Cancer: International Multidisciplinary Consensus on Trial Design

Background

Focal therapy has been introduced for the treatment of localised prostate cancer (PCa). To provide the necessary data for consistent assessment, all focal therapy trials should be performed according to uniform, systematic pre- and post-treatment evaluation with well-defined end points and strict inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Objective

To obtain consensus on trial design for focal therapy in PCa.

Design, setting, and participants

A four-staged consensus project based on a modified Delphi process was conducted in which 48 experts in focal therapy of PCa participated. According to this formal consensus-building method, participants were asked to fill out an iterative sequence of questionnaires to collect data on trial design. Subsequently, a consensus meeting was held in which 13 panellists discussed acquired data, clarified the results, and defined the conclusions.

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis

A multidisciplinary board from oncologic centres worldwide reached consensus on patient selection, pretreatment assessment, evaluation of outcome, and follow-up.

Results and limitations

Inclusion criteria for candidates in focal therapy trials are patients with prostate-specific antigen <15 ng/ml, clinical stage T1c–T2a, Gleason score 3 + 3 or 3 + 4, life expectancy of >10 yr, and any prostate volume. The optimal biopsy strategy includes transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsies to be taken between 6 mo and 12 mo after treatment. The primary objective should be focal ablation of clinically significant disease with negative biopsies at 12 mo after treatment as the primary end point.

Conclusions

This consensus report provides a standard for designing a feasible focal therapy trial.

Patient summary

A variety of ablative technologies have been introduced and applied in a focal manner for the treatment of prostate cancer (PCa). In this consensus report, an international panel of experts in the field of PCa determined pre- and post-treatment work-up for focal therapy research.     

Carbetocin at elective Cesarean delivery: a sequential allocation trial to determine the minimum effective dose

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to determine the intravenous dose of carbetocin required to produce effective uterine contraction in 90% of females (ED₉₀) undergoing elective Cesarean delivery (CD) under spinal anesthesia.

Methods

We conducted a double-blind dose-finding study of carbetocin. Forty females undergoing elective CD received carbetocin intravenously upon delivery of the fetus. The dose of carbetocin for each patient was determined according to a biased-coin up-and-down sequential allocation scheme designed to cluster doses close to ED₉₀. The initial dose was 10 μg, with increments/decrements of 5 μg. The anesthesiologist, obstetrician, and patient were blinded to the dose. The obstetrician assessed the uterine tone at one-minute intervals for five minutes after carbetocin administration. In case of unsatisfactory tone, additional uterotonics were administered. The primary outcome was requirement for additional intraoperative uterotonics. Secondary outcomes were postoperative requirement for additional uterotonics within 24 hr of delivery, estimated blood loss and side effects.

Results

The ED₉₀ of carbetocin was 14.8 μg (95% confidence interval 13.7 to 15.8). Thirty-seven patients (92.5%) had adequate uterine tone with no requirement of additional intraoperative uterotonics. Two patients (5%) required postoperative uterotonics within 24 hr. The overall mean (SD) estimated blood loss was 786 (403) mL and the overall incidence of hypotension (decrease in systolic blood pressure ≥ 20% baseline) was 37.5%.

Conclusion

Based on our study, the ED₉₀ of carbetocin at elective CD is less than one-fifth the currently recommended dose of 100 μg. This study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT-01651130).     

Low-fidelity simulation improves mastery of the aseptic technique for labour epidurals: an observational study

Purpose

The objective of this study was to determine the impact of a low-fidelity simulation model on mastering the sterile technique during placement of epidural catheters.

Methods

Trainees, including residents and fellows, were given conventional teaching consisting of a lecture and a video demonstration on the appropriate sterile technique to apply during the placement of epidural catheters. The trainees were then provided with a one-on-one demonstration session using a low-fidelity Styrofoam? epidural model, followed by a series of simulation sessions. After conventional teaching and following each simulation session, the trainees were assessed on their performance until competence was achieved based on a 15-point checklist. The retention of competence was subsequently evaluated bi-weekly in clinical practice for four assessments.

Results

Twenty-one trainees participated in the study. The average score for the residents following conventional teaching was 6.0 out of 15 points on the checklist. Following the initial one-on-one hands-on demonstration, the average score increased to 10.8 (difference = 4.8, 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.3 to 6.2; P < 0.001). The average score for the fellows following conventional teaching was 7.9 out of 15 points on the checklist. Following the initial one-on-one hands-on demonstration the average score increased to 11.2 (difference = 3.3, 95% CI: 0.05 to 6.6; P = 0.047). During the retention of competence phase, scores ranged from 13-15 for both residents and fellows.

Conclusion

This study describes a comprehensive teaching model for mastering the sterile technique during epidural catheter placement. It suggests that low-fidelity simulation improves the learning process when used in addition to conventional teaching.     

An ovary as unusual contents of an incarcerated umbilical hernia

We present the unusual case of a woman presenting with an incarcerated umbilical hernia. Intraoperatively, the contents of the hernia were found to be an ovary. We outline the clinical presentation of our patient, investigations and management as well as a discussion on unusual contents of umbilical hernias. To our knowledge, this is the first case of a non-malignant ovary incarcerated in an umbilical hernia.     

Renal epithelioid angiomyolipoma: a rare variant with unusual behavior

Purpose

To compare the clinical, pathological and oncological outcome of EAML with classic angiomyolipoma (AML).

Methods

A retrospective review of patients’ files with a diagnosis of AML was conducted. Both classic and epithelioid AML were compared as regard the patients’ demographics, mode of presentation, tumor features and follow-up data. The accuracy of preoperative radiological diagnosis of EAML and the postoperative pathological data were evaluated.

Results

Between November 1988 and July 2012, 1,502 renal masses were treated. Forty-two patients (2.8 %) had renal AML of whom 12 patients (28.6 %) had epithelioid morphology. All the patients with EAML were symptomatic on presentation compared to 16.7 % asymptomatic patients with classic AML. Specific diagnosis of EAML was not suggested based on preoperative radiological evaluation. In one patient, there was a venous tumor extension into the right renal vein; another patient had a solitary pulmonary nodule. Pathological data of EAML patients showed wide areas of necrosis (4 patients), atypia (6 patients), increased mitotic figures (2 patients), nuclear anaplasia, enlarged nuclei and prominent nucleoli (3 patients), and multilobulated multinucleated giant cells (5 patients). At a median follow-up period of 12 and 9 months for EAML and classic AML groups, respectively, one patient with EAML had evidence of both local recurrence and distant metastasis 3 months following open radical nephrectomy.

Conclusion

Epithelioid AML is potentially aggressive and usually present as a symptomatic renal mass. It may be misdiagnosed as malignant renal mass on preoperative radiological evaluation.