Molecular mechanisms and therapeutical implications of intramembrane receptor/receptor interactions among heptahelical receptors with examples from the striatopallidal GABA neurons

The molecular basis for the known intramembrane receptor/receptor interactions among G protein-coupled receptors was postulated to be heteromerization based on receptor subtype-specific interactions between different types of receptor homomers. The discovery of GABAB heterodimers started this field rapidly followed by the discovery of heteromerization among isoreceptors of several G protein-coupled receptors such as delta/kappa opioid receptors. Heteromerization was also discovered among distinct types of G protein-coupled receptors with the initial demonstration of somatostatin SSTR5/dopamine D2 and adenosine A1/dopamine D1 heteromeric receptor complexes. The functional meaning of these heteromeric complexes is to achieve direct or indirect (via adapter proteins) intramembrane receptor/receptor interactions in the complex. G protein-coupled receptors also form heteromeric complexes involving direct interactions with ion channel receptors, the best example being the GABAA/dopamine D5 receptor heteromerization, as well as with receptor tyrosine kinases and with receptor activity modulating proteins. As an example, adenosine, dopamine, and glutamate metabotropic receptor/receptor interactions in the striatopallidal GABA neurons are discussed as well as their relevance for Parkinson's disease, schizophrenia, and drug dependence. The heterodimer is only one type of heteromeric complex, and the evidence is equally compatible with the existence of higher order heteromeric complexes, where also adapter proteins such as homer proteins and scaffolding proteins can exist. These complexes may assist in the process of linking G protein-coupled receptors and ion channel receptors together in a receptor mosaic that may have special integrative value and may constitute the molecular basis for some forms of learning and memory.     

Possible role of intramembrane receptor-receptor interactions in memory and learning via formation of long-lived heteromeric complexes: focus on motor learning in the basal ganglia

Learning in neuronal networks occurs by instructions to the neurons to change their synaptic weights (i.e., efficacies). According to the present model a molecular mechanism that can contribute to change synaptic weights may be represented by multiple interactions between membrane receptors forming aggregates (receptor mosaics) via oligomerization at both pre- and post-synaptic level. These assemblies of receptors together with inter alia single receptors, adapter proteins, G-proteins and ion channels form the membrane bound part of a complex three-dimensional (3D) molecular circuit, the cytoplasmic part of which consists especially of protein kinases, protein phosphatases and phosphoproteins. It is suggested that this molecular circuit has the capability to learn and store information. Thus, engram formation will depend on the resetting of 3D molecular circuits via the formation of new receptor mosaics capable of addressing the transduction of the chemical messages impinging on the cell membrane to certain sets of G-proteins. Short-term memory occurs by a transient stabilization of the receptor mosaics producing the appropriate change in the synaptic weight. Engram consolidation (long-term memory) may involve intracellular signals that translocate to the nucleus to cause the activation of immediate early genes and subsequent formation of postulated adapter proteins which stabilize the receptor mosaics with the formation of long-lived heteromeric receptor complexes. The receptor mosaic hypothesis of the engram formation has been formulated in agreement with the Hebbian rule and gives a novel molecular basis for it by postulating that the pre-synaptic activity change in transmitter and modulator release reorganizes the receptor mosaics at post-synaptic level and subsequently at pre-synaptic level with the formation of novel 3D molecular circuits leading to a different integration of chemical signals impinging on pre- and post-synaptic membranes hence leading to a new value of the synaptic weight. Engram retrieval is brought about by the scanning of the target networks by the highly divergent arousal systems. Hence, a continuous reverberating process occurs both at the level of the neural networks as well as at the level of the 3D molecular circuits within each neuron of the network until the appropriate tuning of the synaptic weights is obtained and, subsequently, the reappearance of the engram occurs. Learning and memory in the basal ganglia is discussed in the frame of the present hypothesis. It is proposed that formation of long-term memories (consolidated receptor mosaics) in the plasma membranes of the striosomal GABA neurons may play a major role in the motivational learning of motor skills of relevance for survival. In conclusion, long-lived heteromeric receptor complexes of high order may be crucial for learning, memory and retrieval processes, where extensive reciprocal feedback loops give rise to coherent synchronized neural activity (binding) essential for a sophisticated information handling by the central nervous system.     

Protective effects of delapril combined with indapamide or hydrochlorothiazide in spontaneously hypertensive stroke-prone rats: a comparative dose-response analysis

In previous articles, we have shown that the combination of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor delapril (12 mg/kg/day) and the diuretic indapamide (1 mg/kg/ day) was able to prolong the life span significantly in salt-loaded stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRsp). Because this finding was partly dependent on the antagonism of salt-loading effects by pharmacologic induction of diuresis, which prevented any increase in blood pressure values, we decided to evaluate whether lower doses of the combination could be equally protective without changing the progression of hypertension. Thus, we studied several treatments with progressively lower doses of delapril (6, 3, or 1.5 mg/kg/day) combined with indapamide (0.5, 0.25, or 0.125 mg/kg/day) or hydrochlorothiazide (2.5, 1.25, or 0.625 mg/kg/day) in salt-loaded SHRsp. Salt-loaded untreated animals were considered to be the control group. In agreement with previous experiments, control rats reached 50% mortality approximately 7 weeks after the beginning of salt loading. The combination of delapril and hydrochlorothiazide at the two lowest doses was not able to delay animal death significantly, whereas treatment with delapril and indapamide at the lowest dose was effective (50% survival rate, 15 weeks). The groups treated with the highest dose of delapril and hydrochlorothiazide or with the intermediate or highest dose of delapril and indapamide did not reach 50% mortality by the end of the experiment, at 44 weeks of treatment (i.e., when animals reached age 1 year). Only the highest delapril and indapamide doses were able to increase diuresis, but for a relatively short period. None of the treatments was able to lower or control blood pressure levels adequately. Therefore, blood pressure levels by themselves were not predictive of rat mortality. In contrast, the maximal value of proteinuria in the weeks preceding death was inversely correlated with the survival time. In conclusion, this study shows that low doses of an ACE inhibitor in combination with a diuretic can be effectively protective in a model of severe hypertension, independent of any change in blood pressure levels.     

Neurotensin counteracts apomorphine-induced inhibition of dopamine release as studied by microdialysis in rat neostriatum

Microdialysis in the neostriatum of the halothane-anesthetized male rats was used to study the effect of neurotensin on the release of dopamine and its metabolites in the absence or presence of systemic apomorphine treatment. Perfusate levels of dopamine, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC) and homovanillic acid (HVA) were assayed by high-performance liquid chromatography in combination with electrochemical detection. Perfusion with neurotensin (1000 nM but not 10 nM) increased the dialysate levels of dopamine without affecting those of DOPAC and HVA. Systemic treatment with apomorphine (0.05 and 0.5 mg/kg, s.c.) reduced the dialysate levels of dopamine, DOPAC and HVA in a dose-related way. Neurotensin (10 nM but not 1 nM) counteracted the inhibitory effect of apomorphine on dialysate levels of dopamine without affecting those of DOPAC and HVA. The results indicate a facilitatory effect of neurotensin on dopamine release in rat neostriatum. It is suggested that activation of neurotensin receptors may cause a reduction in the affinity of dopamine autoreceptors, since the low dose of neurotensin is able to counteract the inhibitory effect of apomorphine on dopamine release.     

Changes in striatal mu and delta opioid receptors after transient forebrain ischemia: a quantitative autoradiographic study.

Transient forebrain ischemia induces specific changes in several neurochemical markers in the dorsolateral striatum. In the present paper, the density and distribution of mu and delta opioid receptors were analyzed in rat striatum 7 days after 30 min forebrain ischemia using the 4-vessel occlusion model. A marked (about 70%) decrease in the density of both opioid receptor subtypes was found in the dorsolateral striatum overlapping the areas of histological damage and of D1 dopamine receptor disappearance. Moreover, the density of delta opioid receptors and of the diffuse mu opioid receptors was also affected (30% decrease) in the ventromedial striatum, an area which is substantially spared by the ischemic lesion. In contrast, the striatal patches of mu opioid receptors were not affected in the ventro-medial striatum and were preserved to a large extent in the area of lesion, although their area and receptor density resulted markedly reduced. The impairment of both opioid receptor subtypes suggests that opiate systems, like dopaminergic systems, are involved in the neurochemical changes observed in the striatum after transient forebrain ischemia.     

The characterization of the dopaminergic profile of EMD 23,448, an indolyl-3-butylamine: Selective actions on presynaptic and supersensitive postsynaptic DA receptor populations

Summary The effects of the dopamine (DA) agonist EMD 23,448 on central normosensitive and supersensitive DA receptors were investigated. EMD 23,448 only slightly inhibits rat striatal DOPA synthesis in vivo and does not inhibit the enhanced striatal DOPA synthesis elicited by acute administration of haloperidol. Also unlike other DA agonists it does not increase striatal acetylcholine levels. However, it inhibits striatal DOPA synthesis in rats with DA receptors rendered supersensitive by chronic treatment with haloperidol. EMD 23,448 also effectively inhibits the enhanced striatal DOPA synthesis elicited by administration of GBL. Furthermore, EMD 23,448 selectively reduces, in a dose-dependant way, DA utilization in nerve terminals of the central caudate and in dotted terminals of the ventral striatum but DA utilization in the substantia nigra is unaffected. The most marked reduction of DA utilization was induced in the anteromedial frontal cortex. These results indicate that EMD 23,448 selectively stimulates presynaptic DA receptors and supersensitive postsynaptic DA receptors. Behavioral experiments in animals with normosensitive and supersensitive DA receptors also indicate that EMD 23,448 effectively stimulates presynaptic and supersensitive postsynaptic DA receptors. Receptor binding studies have shown that EMD 23,448 has a high affinity for the D₂ DA receptors, but it ineffectively promotes the coupling of the DA receptors with the guanine nucleotide regulatory protein. However, at supersensitive striatal DA receptors the coupling is shown to be enhanced by EMD 23,448. The selectivity of EMD 23,448 for presynaptic DA receptors might, at least in part, be related to the presence of DA receptor reserves which are sensitive to EMD 23,448.With regard to the selectivity of EMD 23,448 for supersensitive postsynaptic DA receptors an increase in the efficiency of the coupling mechanism upon activation by EMD 23,448 is probably involved.