PDE5 inhibitor sildenafil citrate augments endothelium-dependent vasodilation in smokers

Smoking is associated with endothelial dysfunction. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of sildenafil, an inhibitor of phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5), on endothelial function in smokers. We evaluated the forearm blood flow (FBF) responses to acetylcholine (ACh), an endothelium-dependent vasodilator, and to sodium nitroprusside (SNP), an endothelium-independent vasodilator, before and after oral sildenafil administration (100 mg) with a strain-gauge plethysmograph in 10 young healthy male smokers and 10 young healthy male nonsmokers. FBF response to ACh was lower in smokers than in nonsmokers. The vasodilatory effects of SNP were similar in both groups. Sildenafil increased the FBF response to ACh from 9.3+/-2.0 to 12.5+/-3.5 mL/min per 100 mL tissue in smokers and from 12.6+/-5.6 to 19.6+/-8.4 mL/min per 100 mL tissue in nonsmokers, and it increased the response to SNP from 13.3+/-3.9 to 15.1+/-4.3 mL/min per 100 mL tissue in smokers and from 14.8+/-5.2 to 18.4+/-6.0 mL/min/100 mL tissue in nonsmokers (P<0.05 for all). The ratio of maximal ACh-stimulated FBF expressed as a ratio of maximal SNP-stimulated FBF significantly increased after administration of sildenafil in both groups. Infusion of NG-monomethyl-L-arginine, a nitric oxide synthase inhibitor, abolished sildenafil-induced augmentation of the FBF response to ACh in both groups. The findings suggest that endothelial function is impaired in smokers compared with that in nonsmokers, that inhibition of PDE5 by sildenafil significantly increases nitric oxide-mediated vasodilation, and that the activities of PDE5 in smokers and nonsmokers may be similar.     

Relationship between neutrophil elastase and acute lung injury in humans

We conducted clinical trials in patients with acute lung injury (ALI) associated with systemic inflammatory response syndrome using a selective neutrophil elastase inhibitor, sivelestat sodium hydrate (Sivelestat), to investigate the involvement of neutrophil elastase in ALI. In the phase III double-blind study (Study 1) in 230 patients, the efficacy of Sivelestat was evaluated with the pulmonary function improvement (PFI) rating as the primary endpoint, and the weaning rate from mechanical ventilator, the discharge rate from intensive care unit (ICU), and the survival rate as secondary endpoints. Afterwards, an unblinded study (Study 2) in 20 patients was conducted using procedures for weaning from mechanical ventilation to reevaluate its efficacy with ventilator-free days (VFD) value, the primary endpoint, and to compare with that of Study 1 subgroup, which met the selection criteria used in Study 2. Sivelestat increased PFI rating, reduced duration of mechanical ventilation, and shortened stay in ICU in Study 1, although there was no significant efficacy on the survival rate. VFD value in Study 2 was comparable to that in the optimal-dose group of Study 1 subgroup, and increase in VFD value correlated with PFI rating and increase in ICU free days. It was concluded that neutrophil elastase may be involved in the pathogenesis of ALI in humans.     

Pharmacology of acute lung injury

The acute lung injury (ALI)/acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a clinical syndrome that affects both medical and surgical patients. To date, despite improved understanding of the pathogenesis of ALI/ARDS, pharmacological modalities have been unsuccessful in decreasing mortality. However, several pharmacological agents for ARDS are in development and have shown great promise. In addition to the anti-inflammatory category including late corticosteroids, inhaled nitric oxide, alveolar surfactant, and vasodilators are being evaluated. Replacements of anticoagulation mediators have also suggested beneficial effects on the patient outcome. This article provides an overview of pharmacological treatments of ALI/ARDS.     

Emergency EC-IC bypass for symptomatic atherosclerotic ischemic stroke

Previous studies have shown that extracranial–intracranial (EC-IC) bypass surgery has no preventive effect on subsequent ipsilateral ischemic stroke in patients with symptomatic atherosclerotic internal carotid occlusion and hemodynamic cerebral ischemia. A few studies have assessed whether an urgent EC-IC bypass surgery is an effective treatment for main trunk stenosis or occlusion in acute stage. The authors retrospectively reviewed 58 consecutive patients who underwent urgent EC-IC bypass for symptomatic internal carotid artery or the middle cerebral artery stenosis or occlusion between January 2003 and December 2011. Clinical characteristics and neuroimagings were evaluated and analyzed. Based on preoperative angiogram, responsible lesions were the internal carotid artery in 19 (32.8 %) patients and the middle cerebral artery in 39 (67.2 %). No hemorrhagic complication occurred. Sixty-nine percent of patients showed improvement of neurological function after surgery, and 74.1 % of patients had favorable outcome. Unfavorable outcome was associated with insufficient collateral flow and new infarction after bypass surgery.