Social adversity in childhood and the risk of developing psychosis: a national cohort study

OBJECTIVE: There is conflicting evidence concerning the association of social childhood factors and subsequent psychosis. Previous studies have had inadequate designs. The aim of the present study was to describe a broad range of social factors during childhood and the risk of developing psychosis later in life in a national cohort. METHOD: The study population consisted of all children born in Sweden in 1963-1983-2.1 million persons-in family households participating in the national census of 1970, 1980, 1985, or 1990. Hazard ratios were estimated for five different indicators of socioeconomic position (living in rented apartments, low socioeconomic status, single-parent households, unemployment, and households receiving social welfare benefits) from hospital admissions for schizophrenia and other psychoses during 1987-2002. RESULTS: Increased age- and sex-adjusted hazard ratios for schizophrenia and other psychoses were found for all childhood socioeconomic indicators, ranking from lowest to highest hazard ratio: rented apartments, low socioeconomic status, single-parent households, unemployment, and households receiving social welfare benefits. Hazard ratios increased with an increasing number of adverse social factors present. Those with four measures of adversity had a 2.7-fold higher risk of schizophrenia than those with none. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that social adversity in childhood and fetal life is independently associated with the risk of developing schizophrenia and other psychoses later in life. The risks increased with an increasing number of exposures, suggesting a dose-response relationship.     

The International Endogene Study: a collection of families for genetic research in endometriosis

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the International Endogene Study is to discover genes that influence susceptibility to endometriosis. DESIGN: The study brings together two research groups based in Australia and the United Kingdom that independently have been collecting families for linkage analysis and candidate gene studies. Both groups used similar methods to recruit families, obtain clinical notes, assign disease status based on the operative records and available histology, and collect common clinical data including age at onset of symptoms, age at diagnosis, and symptoms experienced. SETTING: Recruitment has been mainly from Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States. PATIENT(S): All affected participants have surgically confirmed disease. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Clinical and epidemiological data.RESULT(S): To date, >1,100 families with affected sisters have been recruited, and >1,200 triads (affected women and both parents), for case-control studies.CONCLUSION(S): We have created the largest resource yet assembled of clinical data and DNA for linkage and association studies in endometriosis. The increase in power to detect susceptibility genes vindicates the decision to merge the two studies and demonstrates the value of large-scale international collaboration.     

Subperiosteal aneurysmal bone cyst with associated bone marrow oedema: an unusual appearance

A case of a subperiosteal aneurysmal bone cyst with adjacent bone marrow oedema is presented. Aneurysmal bone cysts have been well documented in the published literature; however, relatively few have been observed in a subperiosteal location, and associated bone marrow oedema in the absence of a demonstrable pathological fracture is a rare finding. Aneursymal bone cyst should be considered in the differential diagnosis of subperiosteal bone lesions and may be associated with bone marrow oedema.     

Production and evaluation of guidelines for the management of inflammatory bowel disease: the Leicester experience

Consensus guidelines for the management of patients with inflammatory bowel disease were produced by gastroenterologists, gastrointestinal surgeons and a cross-section of general practitioners (GPs) from Leicestershire in order to develop a seamless pattern of care with a common approach to diagnosis and treatment. It was hoped that the guidelines would encourage a movement towards care in the community for many patients with stable disease and so speed up new consultation rates. The study then assessed the impact of these guidelines on the referral letters of GPs to hospital consultants, the prediction of disease and adherence to them on re-referring patients after discharge. The guidelines were distributed to all 487 GPs in the Leicester Health Authority area and the gastroenterology teams within the hospitals. The value of the guidelines was assessed by an audit of referral letters, the length of time from referral letter to out-patient appointment, both before and after the launch of the guidelines, adherence to the guidelines on re-referral, and monitoring the outcome of the discharged patients. Whilst the guidelines may have helped GPs to manage stable patients in the community, the content of referral letters and the diagnostic abilities of GPs were not seen to improve since the launch of the guidelines. However, only 5% of stable patients who were discharged from one clinic were re-referred for inflammatory bowel disease.


     

Critical realism as emancipatory action: the case for realistic evaluation in practice development

Abstract  To provide rigour when preparing a research design, the researcher needs to carefully consider not only the methodology but also the philosophical intent of the study. This, however, is often absent from reported research and provides the reader with little evidence by which to judge the merits of the chosen methodology and its influence on the study. The purpose of this paper is to set out the case for critical realism as a framework to guide appropriate action in practice development and realistic evaluation for understanding the consequences of those actions.
It is evident that critical realism and critical social science share common ground. Emancipatory practice development (ePD) is based on the philosophy of critical social science and therefore by virtue is linked to the tenets of critical realism. Until now, the evaluation of ePD programme has been well served by 4th-generation evaluation. However, this paper outlines the need for a different approach to evaluation, one that is based on critical realism, that is concerned with emancipation, and that can be used in the ever-changing environment of clinical practice. Realistic evaluation not only links strongly to ePD programmes, but also serves as the basis for effective research questions that will test the outcomes of the research and inform the transferability of ePD mechanisms into differing contexts.