Effects of long-term treatment with trandolapril on augmented vasoconstriction in rats with chronic heart failure

Background:

Despite the clinical relevance of angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE)inhibitors, their effects on impaired vascular function in patients and animals with chronic heart failure (CHF) have not been fully understood. This study was undertaken to determine whether long-term treatment with an ACE inhibitor improved the altered contractile properties of vessels from rats with CHF.

Methods and Results:

Twelve weeks after coronary artery ligation, the rats were sacrificed and the isometric tension development of thoracic aorta, pulmonary artery, and mesenteric artery with and without endothelium was examined. Contractile responses to norepinephrine and prostaglandin F₂α were augmented in endothelium-intact, but not in endothelium-denuded, thoracic aorta and pulmonary artery segments of the rat with CHF. The contractile response to angiotensin II was augmented in endothelium-denuded mesenteric artery segments of the rat with CHF, which was attenuated by indomethacin or diclofenac sodium but not by bunazosin. Trandolapril (3 mg/kg/d) was administered orally from the 2nd to 12th week after the operation. Treatment with trandolapril reversed the augmented contractile response of the rat with CHF to norepinephrine, prostaglandin F₂α, and angiotensin II almost to the levels in the sham-operated rat.

Conclusions:

The results demonstrate that an ACE inhibitor is capable of reversing altered vascular function in the rat with CHF, suggesting that vascular beds are possible sites of action for ACE inhibitors in the therapy for CHF.     

The relationships among height,penile length,and foot size

To determine whether "folk myths" regarding the relationships of penile size to body height and foot size have any basis in fact, 63 normally virilized men were studied. Height and stretched penile length were measured; shoe size was recorded and converted to foot length. Penile length was found to be statistically related to both body height and foot length, but with weak correlation coefficients. Height and foot size would not serve as practical estimators of penis length.     

What does it mean to involve consumers successfully in NHS research? A consensus study

OBJECTIVE: To obtain consensus on the principles and indicators of successful consumer involvement in NHS research. DESIGN: Consensus methods were used. An expert workshop, employing the nominal group technique was used to generate potential principles and indicators. A two-round postal Delphi process was used to obtain consensus on the principles and indicators. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Participants were drawn from health, social care, universities and consumer organizations. A purposive sampling strategy was used to identify people who had experience and/or knowledge of consumer involvement in NHS research. Six researchers and seven consumers participated in an expert workshop. Ninety-six people completed both rounds of the Delphi process. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Consensus on principles and indicators of successful consumer involvement in NHS research. RESULTS: Eight principles were developed through an expert workshop and Delphi process, and rated as both clear and valid. Consensus was reached on at least one clear and valid indicator by which to measure each principle. CONCLUSIONS: Consensus has been obtained on eight principles of successful consumer involvement in NHS research. They may help commissioners, researchers and consumers to deepen their understanding of this issue, and can be used to guide good practice.     

Social work, general practice and evidence-based policy in the collaborative care of older people: current problems and future possibilities

While collaborative (or joint) working between social services and primary healthcare continues to rise up the policy agenda, current policy is not based on sound evidence of benefit to either patients or the wider community. Both sets of practitioners report benefits for their own work from adopting new arrangements for collaboration. The underlying assumption behind much of this activity is that a greater degree of integration provides benefits to both users and their carers, a perspective that at times obscures the issue of resource availability, especially in the form of practical community services such as district nursing and home help. At the present time there is insufficient evidence to demonstrate that formal arrangements for collaborative working (CW) are better than those forged informally between committed individuals or teams. Furthermore, arrangements for CW have not hitherto been widely evaluated in systematic studies with a comparative design and focus on outcomes for users and carers rather than on processes. In this paper we propose a number of process measures for future evaluation of CW: (1) study populations must be comparable; (2) details of how services are actually delivered must be obtained and colocation should not be assumed to mean collaboration; (3) care packages in areas of comparable resources should be examined; (4) both destinational outcomes and user‐defined evaluations of benefit should be considered; (5) possible disadvantages of integrated care also need to be actively considered; (6) evaluations should include an economic analysis. Those implementing new policies in Primary Care Trusts have, at present, little sound evidence to guide them in their innovative work. However, they should take the opportunity to rigorously test the advantages and disadvantages of collaboration.