A comparison of self-reported colorectal cancer screening with medical records.

The purpose of this study was to compare self-reports of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening by fecal occult blood test (FOBT), sigmoidoscopy, and colonoscopy with medical records in a multiprovider health care setting. Relatives of CRC patients residing in Ontario, Canada completed a questionnaire indicating whether or not they had ever had any CRC screening tests. Medical records from physician's offices and hospitals were compared with the self reports, and where possible, reasons were obtained for nonmatching reports. Medical records for colonoscopies were readily available from various sources, and self-reports of this procedure were very accurate (kappa statistic for agreement beyond chance = 0.87). For sigmoidoscopy and FOBT, the agreement was poorer (kappa = 0.29 and 0.32, respectively); however, there were difficulties in obtaining records for these two procedures. Sigmoidoscopy procedures that took place many years ago were difficult to document, and physician's offices were unable to provide FOBT reports in many cases. Self-reports of colonoscopy were very accurate in this population, whereas self-reports of sigmoidoscopy and FOBT are somewhat less accurate, although this is likely due to challenges in obtaining a confirmatory record rather than an overreporting of tests. In a multiprovider publicly insured health care setting such as Canada, using self-reported information is likely to provide sufficiently accurate information for colonoscopy, but for other CRC screening tests, there may be difficulty in obtaining true estimates of the frequencies of these procedures.     

National Data Sources on the Care and Outcomes of Patients with Community Acquired Pneumonia

Despite improved understanding and treatment of community acquired pneumonia (CAP), variations in clinical practice and patient outcomes still exists, resulting in excess healthcare dollars spent and decreased patient satisfaction. The use of treatment and outcomes research data can help providers improve their methods and standardize techniques to control costs and provide the best care for their patients. To better understand the utility and capabilities of this research, this article will compare several administrative and clinical databases. Two, data sources in particular, the EPI-Q Inc. CAP-Compare database and the University HealthSystem Consortium's (UHC) CAP Benchmarking Program contain clinical and utilization data specific to CAP. In addition there are several government and non-government sponsored data sources that include administrative data on many diagnosis including CAP. These include: Healthcare Benchmarking Systems International's EXPLORE database, the Center for Healthcare Industry Performance Studies database, the National Center for Health Statistics'--National Hospital Discharge Survey, and the Medicare Provider Analysis and Review data files.     

Perspectives on colorectal cancer screening: a focus group study

Objective To assess attitudes and acceptability of Ontario consumers and doctors towards colorectal screening with faecal occult blood testing (FOBT) and colonoscopy. Design, setting and participants Focus groups with gender‐specific samples of the population, high‐risk gastroenterology patients and family doctors. Method Semi‐structured interview guides used by facilitator to lead groups through knowledge of risk factors and prevention of colorectal cancer, the screening modalities, requirements for implementing screening programmes, barriers to screening and preferences towards screening. Main findings There were low levels of knowledge about colorectal cancer and its prevention in the general population. FOBT was an acceptable screening modality, but considerable education about its use and benefits would be necessary to implement a screening programme. Colonoscopy was not perceived to be a good choice for a primary screen in the general population. The high‐risk group supported use of FOBT in the general population and emphasized the need for education. The doctors were more reluctant about screening, requesting clear guidelines. They also identified the time and resources that would be required if a screening programme were initiated. Conclusion While colorectal screening is acceptable in this sample, information and decision aids are required to enable consumers and providers to make effective decisions. Implementation of colorectal screening programmes requires substantial educational efforts for both consumers and doctors.     

Enhancing the Reliability in the Noninvasive Measurement of the His Bundle Magnetic Field Using a Novel Signal Averaging Methodology

Background: Extraction of the weak electrical activity of the “His Bundle” (HB) by noninvasive methods has not been very successful in the past. The study reassesses the use of signal averaged magnetocardiography (SAMCG), overcoming some of the limitations in earlier studies including in the signal averaging methodology. Methods: SAMCG on healthy subjects (14 male and 1 female) were performed using R‐peak as the fiducial point in all cases and also using QRS‐onset as the fiducial point in select cases. Results: A conspicuous feature (H) with a magnitude up to 200 femto Tesla (fT) attributed to the HB activity was observed in the PR segment at several spatial positions on the thorax, with onset at 35–50 ms before the QRS‐onset (V) in 15 out of 18 trials constituting 83% of cases studied. The QRS‐onset as the fiducial point resolved the feature better compared to the conventionally used R‐peak, especially in trials exhibiting spread in heart rate (HR). This is attributed to the fluctuations in Q_onRD (the time interval between QRS‐onset and R‐peak) compared to the temporal stability of the H‐V duration. Conclusions: SAMCG reveals a well‐resolved H feature. The double hump morphology of the feature extended at least up to a frequency of 150 Hz. The importance of the choice of QRS‐onset as the fiducial point is unequivocally demonstrated, illustrated by measurements on subjects exhibiting considerable heart rate variability. The latter has a general validity and should be applicable to SAECG as well.