S-Adenosylmethionine (SAMe) attenuates acetaminophen hepatotoxicity in C57BL/6 mice

Hepatic toxicity is associated with excessive dosages of the over the counter analgesic, acetaminophen (APAP). The aim of this study was to explore protection by the nutritional agent S-adenosylmethionine (SAMe) on APAP hepatotoxicity. Male C57BL/6 mice were injected intraperitoneal (i.p.) with 500 mg/kg (15 ml/kg) APAP or water vehicle (VEH). SAMe was injected i.p. at a dose of either 1000 mg/kg (5 ml/kg) just prior or 500 mg/kg SAMe 15 min prior to administration of VEH or APAP. Comparison of groups showed that SAMe reduced APAP toxicity. Plasma alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels were increased 2 and 4 h after APAP administration when compared to vehicle (VEH) controls. Liver weight was increased relative to the VEH group within 4 h after APAP treatment. Histological examination by light microscopy confirmed small changes in morphology within 2 h after APAP injection and marked centrilobular necrosis within 4 h in the APAP group. In contrast, when APAP was administered to SAMe pretreated mice, ALT and liver weights were comparable to the VEH and SAMe groups. Histological examination also showed that SAMe produced a marked protection in APAP mediated centrilobular necrosis at 4 h after APAP injection. APAP administration depressed hepatic glutathione levels when monitored at 2 and 4 h. Lipid peroxidation was induced above VEH values 2 and 4 h after APAP injection. Consistent with the SAMe protection of APAP hepatic toxicity, the expected depletion of hepatic glutathione (GSH) levels by APAP was prevented by SAMe pretreatment. SAMe pretreatment also prevented the induction of lipid peroxidation at 2 and 4 h post-APAP administration. In conclusion, SAMe provides protection from APAP hepatic toxicity at 2 and 4 h post-APAP injection. SAMe pretreatment prevented APAP associated depletion in hepatic glutathione and induction of lipid peroxidation as part of its mechanism of protection.     

An impending crisis in the provision of histopathology expertise for mouse functional genomics

The generation of new mouse models of human disease is accelerating rapidly, due to the completion of whole‐genome sequencing efforts and technological advances in the manipulation of the mouse genome. We sought to investigate manpower issues in the provision of histopathology expertise for mouse functional genomics and compared this to the perceived demand from principal investigators (PIs). Through the European Commission (EC)‐funded PRIME pathology training initiative, two questionnaires were devised to collect information from pathologists and EC‐funded PIs on the current provision of mouse histopathology expertise in Europe and the demands for this service. We find that pathological analysis is being performed almost exclusively by professionally qualified pathologists, generally employed in clinical diagnostic posts, where the work is undertaken as collaboration outside of their contractual commitments but without previous training in veterinary or comparative pathology. The results indicate that there is a lack of both trainees and provision of specialist training in this field. Unsurprisingly, the availability of diagnostic expertise and advice falls far short of the number of genetically engineered mice (GEM) being generated for analysis. We analyse these results with reference to previous studies and discuss solutions for the future recruitment, training and funding for pathologists in mouse functional genomics in Europe. Copyright © 2008 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Efficacy and safety of rizatriptan wafer for the acute treatment of migraine

Rizatriptan is a potent, highly selective 5HT1B/1D agonist with rapid onset of action for acute treatment of migraine. Rizatriptan wafer is a novel, freeze-dried dosage formulation of rizatriptan which rapidly disintegrates on the tongue, is swallowed with saliva, and may be taken without liquids. The efficacy and tolerability of rizatriptan wafer were examined in a placebo-controlled, double-blind, outpatient study in 555 migraineurs. The primary efficacy endpoint was pain relief at 2 h. From 30 min onwards, significantly more patients experienced pain relief and became pain-free after rizatriptan 10-mg wafer compared to placebo. At 2 h, the percentage of patients with pain relief was significantly higher after rizatriptan 10-mg wafer (74%), 5-mg wafer (59%) compared with placebo (28%). Rizatriptan 10-mg wafer was superior to rizatriptan 5-mg wafer on pain relief at 1.5 and 2 h (p < 0.05). Significantly more patients were pain-free at 2 h after rizatriptan 10-mg wafer (42%), 5-mg wafer (35%) compared with placebo (10%). Both doses of rizatriptan wafer were well tolerated. Rizatriptan wafer is a convenient, highly effective new formulation for acute treatment of migraine.     

Randomized study of didanosine monotherapy and combination therapy with zidovudine in hemophilic and nonhemophilic subjects with asymptomatic human immunodeficiency virus-1 infection. AIDS Clinical Trial Groups

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of didanosine (ddl) monotherapy and three different combinations of zidovudine (ZDV) and ddl in asymptomatic human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) infection, we conducted an open-label, phase I/II study in 126 asymptomatic HIV-1- infected hemophilic and nonhemophilic subjects with a CD4 count of 200 to 500/mm3 stratified for prior zidovudine treatment and baseline CD4 count. Study arms included arm A, low-dose combination (ZDV 150 mg and ddl 134 mg, daily); arm B, moderate-dose combination (ZDV 300 mg and ddI 334 mg, daily); arm C, high-dose combination (ZDV 600 mg and ddl 500 mg, daily), and arm D, ddl monotherapy (ddl 500 mg, daily). Earlier, more frequent hepatotoxicity was experienced by hemophilic subjects (P = .008), but there were no differences in toxicity between treatment arms (P = .51), nor were there any differences in the rate of development of clinical endpoints by treatment (P = .41). Smaller median CD4 increases occurred over the first 12 weeks for arms A and D, 44/mm3 and 42/mm3, than arms B and C, 105/mm3 and 114/mm3, respectively, (P = .015). Hemophilia status (P = .0004) and prior ZDV experience (P = .044) independently predicted weaker CD4 responses during the first 12 weeks of treatment. Using a regression model and adjusting for hemophilia status, prior ZDV treatment, and baseline CD4, there was a significant reduction in quantitative viral load from baseline by week 12 for all treatment arms combined (P = .0001), with significantly lower median percent reduction for arm A (56.3%) than arms B, C, and D (94.6%, 98.5%, and 91.9%, respectively, P = .015). Although greater hepatoxicity and weaker CD4 responses occur in hemophilic subjects, didanosine monotherapy and combination therapy with zidovudine are safe and effective in asymptomatic HIV-1-infected patients.