Adverse Tumor Biology Associated with Mesenterico-Portal Vein Resection Influences Survival in Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Background

Although pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) with mesenterico-portal vein resection (VR) can be performed safely in patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), the impact of this approach on long-term survival is controversial.

Patients and Methods

Analyses of a prospectively collected database revealed 122 consecutive patients with PDAC who underwent PD with (PD+VR) or without (PD?VR) VR between January 2004 and May 2012. Clinical data, operative results, and survival outcomes were analysed.

Results

Sixty-four (53 %) patients underwent PD+VR. The majority (84 %) of the venous reconstructions were performed with a primary end-to-end anastomosis. Demographic and postoperative outcomes were similar between the two groups. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, duration of operation, intraoperative blood loss, and blood transfusion requirement were significantly greater in the PD+VR group compared with the PD?VR group. Furthermore, the tumor size was larger, and the rates of periuncinate neural invasion and positive resection margin were higher in the PD+VR group compared with the PD?VR group. Histological venous involvement occurred in 47 of 62 (76 %) patients in the PD+VR group. At a median follow-up of 29 months, the median overall survival (OS) was 18 months for the PD+VR group, and 31 months for the PD?VR group (p = 0.016). ASA score, lymph node metastasis, neurovascular invasion, and tumor differentiation were predictive of survival. The need for VR in itself was not prognostic of survival.

Conclusions

PD with VR has similar morbidity but worse OS compared with a PD?VR. Although VR is not predictive of survival, tumors requiring a PD+VR have more adverse biological features.     

Associations of sitting time with leisure-time physical inactivity,education, and body mass index change

We aimed to investigate the associations of long-term leisure-time physical inactivity, body mass index (BMI) change, and education with sitting time in a 35-year follow-up based on self-reports in surveys. Influences of working status in 2011 and familial confounding on the associations were tested. Data were based on the population-based Finnish Twin Cohort of 5232 twins (53-67-year-old, 41% men) with four surveys in 1975-2011. Statistical analyses were performed using linear regression with several covariates. The effect of familial confounding (genetics and shared environment) was analyzed using a co-twin control design which should be interpreted as if familial confounding plays a role, an association should be seen among all individuals but not in discordant twin pairs. Compared to those not at work, those at work had a longer total sitting time/d. For those at work, higher education was associated with more total sitting but with less non-work sitting. Long-term leisure-time physical inactivity was associated with more non-work sitting among those at work, whereas long-term weight gain with more total and non-work sitting regardless of working status. Familial confounding attenuated the associations, except for the association of increasing BMI with total and non-work sitting among women at work. To conclude, total sitting time was longer among those still at work, but it was also influenced by long-term leisure-time physical inactivity, higher education, and an increase of BMI over the years. Public health efforts should be targeted to reduce sedentary behavior by promoting life-long leisure-time physical activity and weight control.