Colonic J-Pouch vs. Coloplasty Following Resection of Distal Rectal Cancer

PURPOSE: In terms of functional outcome, there is evidence of the superiority of the colonic J-pouch over a straight coloanal anastomosis. Even though the colonic J-pouch was created to restore a neorectal reservoir, manometric data show that the volume of a short colonic J-pouch does not differ from a straight coloanal anastomosis. We speculate that the advantage of the colonic J-pouch is not in creating a larger neorectal reservoir, but rather related to decreased motility. Maurer and Zgraggen recently described a new colonic pouch design, performing a transverse coloplasty pouch. The purpose of this pilot study was to compare the feasibility and functional outcome of the 5-cm colonic J-pouch vs. the coloplasty pouch. METHODS: From February 2000 to June 2001, we randomized 40 consecutive patients with distal rectal cancer (<12 cm from the anal verge) into the J-pouch or coloplasty group. A low rectal resection and coloanal anastomosis was performed in all patients. Functional data were collected by a standardized questionnaire and anorectal manometry, preoperatively and six months postoperatively. Primary end points of the study were potentially differences of both groups regarding technical feasibility, stool frequency, and anorectal manometry. RESULTS: The construction of a coloplasty pouch was feasible in all cases of the coloplasty group, but not in 5 of 20 (25 percent) patients of the J-pouch group, because of colonic adipose tissue. Six months after operation or stoma closure, respectively, stool frequency was 2.75 ± 1 per day in the J-pouch group and 2 ± 2 per day in the coloplasty group. There was no significant difference in resting and squeeze pressure and neorectal volume between both groups, but an increased neorectal sensitivity in the coloplasty group. CONCLUSION: We found similar functional results in the coloplasty group compared to the J-pouch group. The neorectal sensitivity was increased in the coloplasty group. Therefore, the colonic coloplasty seems to be an attractive pouch design because of its feasibility, simplicity, and effectiveness.     

Dolasetron for preventing postanesthetic shivering.

We designed this study to assess the efficacy of dolasetron compared with clonidine and placebo in prophylaxis of postanesthetic shivering. We included 90 patients undergoing elective abdominal or urologic surgery. The patients were randomly assigned to one three groups (each group n = 30) using a double-blinded study protocol: Group A received 12.5 mg dolasetron, Group B 3 microg/kg clonidine, and Group C saline 0.9% as placebo. The medication was given after the induction of anesthesia. Postanesthetic shivering was judged by using a five-point scale. In the Clonidine group, 86.6% showed no shivering, whereas in the Dolasetron and Placebo groups, only 63.3% and 66.6%, respectively, were symptom free. Only clonidine, but not dolasetron, significantly reduced the incidence and the severity of shivering. We conclude that clonidine is effective in preventing shivering when given before surgery, whereas dolasetron, at the dose used, is not effective. IMPLICATIONS: Shivering, an irregular muscular fasciculation lasting longer than 15 s, is a common complication secondary to general anesthesia. We compared dolasetron with clonidine (an established antishivering drug) in the prevention of postanesthetic shivering. Dolasetron 12.5 mg was not effective.     

Association between human recombinant EPO and peripheral vascular disease in diabetic patients receiving peritoneal dialysis

Peripheral vascular disease is a serious and frequent problem in diabetic patients. Since the beginning of the widespread use of erythropoietin (EPO), we have noted an increase in peripheral vascular disease in diabetic patients receiving peritoneal dialysis and erythropoietin. This prompted us to study the effects of erythropoietin on peripheral vascular disease in patients receiving peritoneal dialysis. We retrospectively reviewed medical records of all diabetic patients in our program who received peritoneal dialysis from 1990 to 1996. Demographic and laboratory data as well as EPO use data were collected. Hospital days and occurrence of vascular events (defined as peripheral vascular surgery, amputation, or recommendation of vascular surgery or amputation by a vascular surgeon) were determined for diabetic patients receiving peritoneal dialysis. Comparisons were made between those who received EPO and those who did not received EPO, as well as comparing vascular events in 28 patients who received peritoneal dialysis before and after beginning EPO. Patients who received erythropoietin were found to have a significantly shorter time to a first vascular event, a greater number of vascular events, and more hospital days associated with vascular disease than diabetic patients who did not receive erythropoietin. With multivariate analysis, significant risk factors for the development of peripheral vascular disease in these patients were erythropoietin use, erythropoietin dose, and smoking. Twenty-eight patients who initially performed peritoneal dialysis without receiving EPO, and later received EPO, had a significant increase in vascular events, including amputations only while receiving EPO. We found the use of erythropoietin to be associated with peripheral vascular events in diabetic patients who receive peritoneal dialysis. Further investigation is warranted.     

A randomized prospective comparison of oral versus intraperitoneal ofloxacin as the primary treatment of CAPD peritonitis

Summary: Oral ofloxacin has been successfully used in our centres for the primary treatment of peritonitis complicating continous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). In view of the progressive rise in the resistance rate to ofloxacin among peritoneal bacterial isolates, a study was conducted to determine if oral ofloxacin remains a viable first line treatment for CAPD peritonitis in our centres and if the result can be improved by changing from an oral to an intraperitoneal (i.p.) route. In patients on three 2 L daily CAPD exchanges, ofloxacin given at the i.p. dosage of 200 mg loading followed by 25 mg/L of peritoneal dialysate achieved overnight trough peritoneal levels which are at least four times the minimal 90% inhibitory concentration (MIC90) of most bacterial pathogens without significant accumulation in the systemic circulation. This i.p. dosage was therefore chosen for the clinical study and the result was compared to that using ofloxacin given in the oral dosage of 400 mg loading followed by 300 mg once daily as maintenance. of all the recruited episodes, 35 were eligible for analysis. the overall primary cure rate including primary failures and relapses was 55.6% (10/18) in the oral treatment group and 70.6% (12/17) in the i.p. treatment group. the corresponding figures for gram positive bacterial (g +) infections were 36.4% and 50%, for gram negative bacterial (g -) infections were 66.7 and 80% and for culture negative infections were 75 and 80%. In culture positive cases, all treatment failures were due to resistant infections which were observed in 42.3% of all bacterial isolates, 47.1% of g + isolates and 33.3% of g - isolates. Due to the high background level of bacterial resistance among our CAPD population, ofloxacin monotherapy given either by the oral or the i.p. route can no longer be recommended for the primary treatment of CAPD peritonitis.     

Genetic and antigenic analysis of invasive serogroup C Neisseria meningitidis in Canada: A decrease in the electrophoretic type (ET)-15 clonal type and an increase in the proportion of isolates belonging to the ET-37 (but not ET-15) clonal type during the period from 2002 to 2009

BACKGROUND:

Serogroup C meningococcal disease has been endemic in Canada since the early 1990s, with periods of hyperendemic disease documented in the past two decades. The present study characterized invasive serogroup C meningococci in Canada during the period from 2002 to 2009.

METHODS:

Serogroup C meningococci were serotyped using monoclonal antibodies. Their clonal types were identified by either multilocus enzyme electrophoresis or multilocus sequence typing.

RESULTS:

The number of invasive serogroup C Neisseria meningitidis isolates received at the National Microbiology Laboratory (Winnipeg, Manitoba) for characterization has dropped from a high of 173 isolates in 2001 to just 17 in 2009, possibly related to the introduction of the serogroup C meningococcal conjugate vaccine. Before 2006, 80% to 95% of all invasive serogroup C meningococci belonged to the electrophoreic type (ET)-15 clonal type, and the ET-37 (but not ET-15) type only accounted for up to 5% of all isolates. However, beginning in 2006, the percentage of the ET-15 clonal type decreased while the ET-37 (but not ET-15) type increased from 27% in 2006 to 52% in 2009. The percentage of invasive serogroup C isolates not belonging to either ET-15 or ET-37 also increased. Most ET-15 isolates expressed the antigenic formula of C:2a:P1.7,1 or C:2a:P1.5. In contrast, the ET-37 (but not ET-15) isolates mostly expressed the antigens of C:2a:P1.5,2 or C:2a:P1.2.

CONCLUSION:

A shift in the antigenic and clonal type of invasive serogroup C meningococi was noted. This finding suggests vigilance in the surveillance of meningoccocal disease is warranted.