Preliminary screening of job applicants in five steps

If you receive a gargantuan response to your next help-wanted ad, take heart. Having too many job applicants need not be a problem if you take a little time to do some preliminary screening. In this article, the author suggests a five-step screening technique that will help you identify the best applicants from a large pool. Specifically, the article explains how to eliminate unsuitable candidates and offers practical guidelines for ranking qualified applicants. It also offers advice about verifying job eligibility and using skill tests in the application process. Finally, the author offers seven specific characteristics to look for when conducting brief telephone screening interviews with job candidates, as well as additional tips for making your screening process most effective.     

Risk factors for femicide in abusive relationships: results from a multisite case control study

OBJECTIVES: This 11-city study sought to identify risk factors for femicide in abusive relationships. METHODS: Proxies of 220 intimate partner femicide victims identified from police or medical examiner records were interviewed, along with 343 abused control women. RESULTS: Preincident risk factors associated in multivariate analyses with increased risk of intimate partner femicide included perpetrator's access to a gun and previous threat with a weapon, perpetrator's stepchild in the home, and estrangement, especially from a controlling partner. Never living together and prior domestic violence arrest were associated with lowered risks. Significant incident factors included the victim having left for another partner and the perpetrator's use of a gun. Other significant bivariate-level risks included stalking, forced sex, and abuse during pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: There are identifiable risk factors for intimate partner femicides.     

Administration of antidepressants. Single versus split dosing: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the literature comparing antidepressant effects of multiple daily dosing versus single daily dosing of antidepressants. METHOD: Studies comparing efficacy of single versus multiple daily dosing of antidepressants were reviewed. Data from the clinical trials meeting our inclusion criteria was subgrouped according to the half-life of the antidepressant drug studied. Meta-analyses were carried out to compare antidepressant efficacy of single versus multiple daily dosing overall and separately for the short, intermediate, and long half life antidepressant agent subgroups. RESULTS: The review process identified 22 studies comparing the therapeutic effect of antidepressants according to their dosing schedules. Although most studies used antidepressant medications with short half-lives, none found a significant difference in therapeutic efficacy. Furthermore, the improvement rates in depression scores in between the two groups were almost identical (SDD versus MDD). CONCLUSION: This meta-analytic approach found no advantage for multiple daily dosing and suggests that sustained therapeutic serum levels are not necessary for achievement of therapeutic activity. Antidepressant benefit may simply require a limited duration of exposure above the threshold serum level. Administration of antidepressants in single daily doses appears sufficient to perturb the physiological pathways associated with depression sufficiently to achieve an adaptive therapeutic response. Moreover, a single daily dosing regimen offers the potential advantages of simplicity, increased compliance, and reduced adverse effects, which in turn would increase the overall success rate in treatment of depression.     

Patient information. First evaluation

The recent harmonisation of the jurisprudence between the Court of Appeal and State Council has affected medical responsibility because it is now the physician's obligation to prove that the information to the patient has been properly given: it is, therefore, a current issue. A first evaluation was undertaken to determine the modalities of patient information in cardiology by an enquiry of cardiologists working in the public and private sectors. The results show that information to patients was given concerning complementary investigations such as exercise stress testing, transoesophageal echocardiography, coronary angiography and cardiac pacing; the information was more often given for invasive procedures. In the great majority of cases (92%), it is the prescribing or operating physician who gives this information, usually the day before the procedure, with complementary oral explanations in about 90% of cases. Patient information, therefore, seems to be well done by cardiologists. However, the proof of information is not always easy, written consent, signed by the patient, not being compulsory at present.     

The false organic-psychogenic distinction and related problems in the classification of erectile dysfunction

The traditional distinction between organic and psychogenic erectile dysfunction (ED) was maintained in the recent report of the Nomenclature Committee of the International Society for Sexual and Impotence Research. Among the major problems with this distinction are that it is based on an obsolete view of mind-body distinctions, does not take into account knowledge of the neurobiology of 'psychological' disorders, disregards the fundamental meaning of 'psychosomatic,' is too often diagnosed by exclusion, and may imply to the patient that his ED is 'all in the mind.' As a result, the distinction has become counterproductive in the diagnosis, classification, and treatment of ED, and in research into the causes of ED. An alternative taxonomy, based on that proposed by the Nomenclature Committee, reclassifies as organic several of the causes of ED now considered to be psychogenic, and considers others as situational ED, a class reserved for episodic occurrences of ED clearly due to particular attributes of sexual encounters.