Status of confocal laser endomicroscopy in gastrointestinal disease

Confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) is an advanced imaging technique which combines conventional white light endoscopy (WLE) with an integrated or probe based confocal microscope. This allows microscopic examination of the surface epithelium and in vivo diagnosis during endoscopy. Established CLE applications include the diagnosis of Barrett's oesophagus, gastric intestinal metaplasia, coeliac disease and microscopic colitis. CLE can differentiate hyperplastic from adenomatous polyps in the colon and may obviate the need to biopsy all polyps at endoscopy. CLE is particularly helpful in surveillance endoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease where it has been shown to reduce the number of biopsies required and improve the detection of dysplasia. The future of CLE may be with new contrast agents to allow for molecular tagging and improved endoscopic diagnoses. The aim of this review is to describe the technology and techniques involved in CLE, and discuss the evolving applications in obtaining "virtual biopsy" throughout the GI tract.     

Pregnancy related issues in inflammatory bowel disease: evidence base and patients' perspective

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) affects women of childbearing age and can influence fertility, pregnancy and decisions regarding breastfeeding. Women with IBD need to consider the possible course of disease during pregnancy, the benefits and risks associated with medications required for disease management during pregnancy and breastfeeding and the effects of mode of delivery on their disease. When indicated, aminosalicylates and thiopurines can be safely used during pregnancy. Infliximab and Adalimumab are considered probably safe during the first two trimesters. During the third trimester the placenta can be crossed and caution should be applied. Methotrexate is associated with severe teratogenicity due to its folate antagonism and is strictly contraindicated. Women with IBD tend to deliver earlier than healthy women, but can have a vaginal delivery in most cases. Caesarean sections are generally recommended for women with active perianal disease or after ileo-anal pouch surgery.While the impact of disease activity and medication has been addressed in several studies, there are minimal studies evaluating patients' perspective on these issues. Women's attitudes may influence their decision to have children and can positively or negatively influence the chance of conceiving, and their beliefs regarding therapies may impact on the course of their disease during pregnancy and/or breastfeeding. This review article outlines the impact of IBD and its treatment on pregnancy, and examines the available data on patients' views on this subject.     

Mortality from inflammatory bowel diseases

Ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) may directly result in morbidity and rarely mortality from complications such as colorectal cancer or sepsis. Mortality rates compared with the matched general population, measured by standardized mortality ratio, may therefore be increased. This review examines the evidence derived from cohort- and population-based mortality studies. In CD the majority of studies and two meta-analyses demonstrated increased standardized mortality ratios of ≈ 1.5-fold, especially for those diagnosed at younger ages and requiring extensive or multiple resection surgery. In UC mortality rates are similar to those of the general population in most studies and a meta-analysis. Proctocolectomy removes the inflammatory burden of UC and can manage colorectal dysplasia but may result in perioperative complications. There is no clear temporal trend of improvement in survival for either CD or UC. Few data are available from countries outside Europe and North America, so geographical influences remain largely unknown.     

Current knowledge on the sensitivity of the <Superscript>68</Superscript>Ga-somatostatin receptor positron emission tomography and the SUV<Subscript>max</Subscript> reference range for management of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours

Physiologically increased pancreatic uptake at the head/uncinate process is observed in more than one-third of patients after injection of one of the three ⁶⁸Ga-labelled octreotide-based peptides used for somatostatin (sst) receptor (r) imaging. There are minor differences between these ⁶⁸Ga-sstr-binding peptides in the imaging setting. On ⁶⁸Ga-sstr-imaging the physiological uptake can be diffuse or focal and usually remains stable over time. Differences in the maximal standardised uptake values (SUV_max) reported for the normal pancreas as well as for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour (PNET) lesions may be related to several factors, including (a) differences in the peptide binding affinities as well as differences in sstr subtype expression of pancreatic α- and β-cells, and heterogeneity / density of tumour cells, (b) differences in scanner resolution, image reconstruction techniques and acquisition protocols, (c) mostly retrospective study designs, (d) mixed patient populations, or (e) interference with medications such as treatment with long-acting sst analogues. The major limitation in most of the studies lies in the lack of histopathological confirmation of abnormal findings. There is a significant overlap between the calculated SUV_max-values for physiological pancreas and PNET-lesions of the head/uncinate process that do not favour the use of quantitative parameters in the clinical setting. Anecdotal long-term follow-up studies have even indicated that increased uptake in the head/uncinate process still can turn out to be malignant over years of follow up. SUV_max-data for the pancreatic body and tail are limited. Therefore, any visible focal tracer uptake in the pancreas must be considered as suspicious for malignancy irrespective of quantitative parameters. In general, sstr-PET/CT has significant implications for the management of NET patients leading to a change in treatment decision in about one-third of patients. Therefore, follow-up with ⁶⁸Ga-sstr-PET/CT is mandatory in the clinical setting if uptake in the head/uncinate process is observed.     

Reconstruction of the proximal femur with a modular resection prosthesis

Background

Various megaprostheses are currently available for reconstruction of the proximal femur after tumor resection. This study evaluates the survival and complications of a modular megaprosthesis for reconstruction of the proximal femur.

Materials and methods

We studied the medical files of 109 tumor patients (age range 16–86 years) who underwent proximal femoral reconstruction with the MRP^® megaprosthesis from 2002 to 2011. There were 70 patients with metastases, 34 patients with bone sarcomas, and five patients with hematological malignancies; 82 were primary and 27 were revision reconstructions. Mean follow-up was 2.5 years; 31 patients had a minimum five-year follow-up. We evaluated the survival and function of the patients, and the survival and complications of the megaprostheses.

Results

Survival was significantly higher for the patients with bone sarcomas compared to those with metastases and hematological malignancies. Mean MSTS functional score was similar between patients with bone sarcomas and those with hematological malignancies and metastases, and between patients with primary and those with revision reconstructions. Overall survival of the MRP^® megaprostheses was 74 % at 5 and 9 years. Fourteen (13.6 %) major complications occurred at a mean period of 1.4 years (range 3 months to 4.5 years); these included infection (5.8 %), dislocation (3.9 %), local recurrence (2.9 %), and acetabular fracture (1 %).

Conclusion

MRP^® megaprostheses are a valuable reconstruction option after tumor resection of the proximal femur.