Alternate methods for laparoscopic management of adnexal masses greater than 10 cm in diameter.

PURPOSE: We describe alternate laparoscopic methods for inspection and removal of large adnexal masses, and report our experience with 18 cases in which these methods were used. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between April 1994 and January 2000, the first author performed operative laparoscopy on 18 patients, each of whom had at least one adnexal mass with maximum diameter greater than 10 cm. Mean patient age was 32 years (range 11 to 82). Seventeen of the 18 patients were premenopausal. All procedures were performed at one of two community hospitals in Seattle or at Yuan's General Hospital in Taiwan. Preoperative screening included pelvic exam, tumor markers, and ultrasound. RESULTS: One 82-year-old patient underwent planned laparoscopic bilateral oopherectomy. In the other 17 cases the operative goal was cystectomy or unilateral oopherectomy with conservation of reproductive function. Cystectomy was successfully performed in five of these cases (29.4%). The remaining 12 patients underwent either unilateral oopherectomy (10 cases, 58.8%), or unilateral salpingo oopherectomy (2 cases, 8.8%) due to the extent of their mass. Sixteen of the 18 cases in this series were successfully managed by a single laparoscopic surgery, one case required a second-look laparoscopy, and in one case a malignancy was found by histological analysis of permanent section, which required a second laparoscopy for staging and debulking. CONCLUSIONS: Large adnexal masses can be successfully managed with minimal hospital stay using laparoscopic techniques, when care is taken to avoid rupture and spillage of cyst contents, and thorough inspection of the mass and abdominal cavity is made possible. The probability of finding an unexpected malignancy is low. In those cases where a malignancy is found, appropriate cytoreductive staging surgery can be performed immediately.     

Can anesthetic techniques or drugs affect cancer recurrence in patients undergoing cancer surgery?

Despite the development of effective chemotherapy and radiotherapy, surgery remains the mainstay treatment of many cancers, requiring anesthesia. Almost all cancer deaths after primary surgery are attributable to recurrence or metastases. Recently it has been hypothesized that the perioperative anesthetic management of cancer patients could potentially affect the risk of recurrence and metastases, which implies a key role for anesthesiologists in choosing anesthetic agents and techniques that optimize the balance between the metastatic potential of the tumor versus its elimination by antimetastatic immune defenses. This review summarizes available experimental information on the potential effects of common anesthetic agents and techniques on cancer metastases and the conflicting retrospective clinical data on regional anesthesia in various types of cancer. A number of prospective, randomized, multicenter, clinical trials are in progress, and their results are eagerly awaited.     

Comparison of cleansing methods in preparation for colonic surgery

Golytely, an oral gut lavage solution, was compared with a standard bowel cleansing preparation in patients undergoing elective colonic surgery. Sixty patients were randomly assigned to either a one-day preparation with Golytely and bisacodyl or a standard method using a three-day clear liquid diet, cathartics, and enemas. Colon cleansing was better with Golytely (100 percent optimal cleansing vs. 64 percent, P less than 0.05). Patients receiving Golytely had less weight loss and found this preparation more tolerable. Quantitative stool cultures before and after preparation and intraoperatively were not significantly different between the two preparations. In this surgical bowel preparation study, Golytely and Bisacodyl were found to be safe, rapid, and effective. The preparation was well tolerated by patients and has become our preferred method of colonic cleansing.     

Infantile Digital Fibroma Treated With Mohs Micrographic Surgery

BACKGROUND: Infantile digital fibroma (IDF) is a rare benign fibrous tumor of childhood that frequently recurs despite local excision. Conservative, nonsurgical management may result in regression and/or joint deformity. OBJECTIVE: To describe the histologic features of IDF and discuss a case excised using Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS). METHODS: Case report and review of the clinical, histologic, and ultrastructural features. RESULTS: Characteristic inclusion bodies of actin were identified with hematoxylin and eosin, Masson's trichrome, and rapid actin immunostain. The tumor was debulked and the majority was removed after one stage of MMS, except where the deep margin approached the joint space. The defect healed by secondary intention. At 2 years the patient had no recurrence or functional joint deformity. CONCLUSION: MMS is a surgical treatment option for IDF.     

Effects of remifentanil and alfentanil on the cardiovascular responses to induction of anaesthesia and tracheal intubation in the elderly

Background. We compared the effects of remifentanil and alfentanilon arterial pressure and heart rate at induction of anaesthesiaand tracheal intubation in 40 ASA I–III patients agedgreater than 65 yr, in a randomized double-blind study. Methods. Patients received either remifentanil 0.5 µgkg^–1 over 30 s, followed by an infusion of 0.1 µgkg min^–1 (group R) or alfentanil 10 µg kg^–1over 30 s, followed by an infusion of saline (group A). Anaesthesiawas then induced with propofol, rocuronium, and 1% isofluranewith 66% nitrous oxide in oxygen. Results. Systolic arterial pressure (SAP) and mean arterialpressure (MAP) decreased after the induction of anaesthesia(P<0.05) and increased for 3 min after intubation in bothgroups (P<0.05), but remained below baseline values throughout.Heart rate remained stable after induction of anaesthesia butincreased significantly from baseline after intubation for 1and 4 min in groups R and A, respectively (P<0.05). Therewere no significant between-group differences in SAP, MAP, andheart rate. Diastolic pressure was significantly higher in groupA than group R at 4 and 5 min after intubation (P<0.05).Hypotension (SAP <100 mm Hg) occurred in four patients ingroup R and three patients in group A. Conclusions. Remifentanil and alfentanil similarly attenuatethe pressor response to laryngoscopy and intubation, but theincidence of hypotension confirms that both drugs should beused with caution in elderly patients. Br J Anaesth 2002; 88: 430–3     

Myeloproliferative syndrome induced by MPSV in DBA/2 mice: presence of a mixed-colonies promoting activity (MPA) in the spleen

The myeloproliferative syndrome induced by the myeloproliferative sarcoma virus (MPSV) in DBA/2 mice stimulates the proliferation of pluripotent hemopoietic stem cells (HSC) and of progenitors committed toward granulomacrophagic and erythroid cell lines. This stimulation may result from a direct effect of the MPSV on HSC or from an indirect effect via locally secreted factors. Normal isogenic bone marrow cells were incubated in the mixed colony-forming unit system in semisolid medium supplemented with conditioned media obtained after incubating neoplastic spleen cells for 3 days at 37 degrees C. These spleen conditioned media contain an activity that is physically separable from MPSV by ultracentrifugation and which, in the presence of a very low quantity of erythropoietin, can induce in vitro the proliferation and differentiation of pluripotent HSC, detected by this Mix-CFU technique. We termed this activity mixed-colonies promoting activity (MPA). These results suggest that the hyperplasia of the nonlymphoid hematopoietic system in the neoplastic spleen results from an indirect effect of the MPSV on pluripotent HSC via locally secreted factors.     

Practice-Based Research Priorities for Palliative Care: Results From a Research-to-Practice Consensus Workshop

We employed the research-to-practice consensus workshop (RTP; workshops held in New York City and Tompkins County, New York, in 2013) model to merge researcher and practitioner views of translational research priorities in palliative care. In the RTP approach, a diverse group of frontline providers generates a research agenda for palliative care in collaboration with researchers. We have presented the major workshop recommendations and contrasted the practice-based research priorities with those of previous consensus efforts. We uncovered notable differences and found that the RTP model can produce unique insights into research priorities. Integrating practitioner-identified needs into research priorities for palliative care can contribute to addressing palliative care more effectively as a public health issue.Over the past 2 decades, palliative care has become established as a promising approach for addressing the needs of individuals with life-threatening illnesses from a holistic, interdisciplinary perspective. For this project, we defined palliative care as an approach that improves the quality of life of patients and families facing the problems encountered in life-threatening illness by preventing and relieving suffering. Core components of palliative care include providing relief from pain and other distressing symptoms, affirming dying as a normal process, integrating psychological and spiritual aspects of care, enhancing the quality of life of patients, and offering support systems to patients and their families to help them live as fully as possible until death occurs.Research suggests that palliative care results in positive patient outcomes, greater patient and family satisfaction, and significant cost savings.1,2 The American Public Health Association, the World Health Organization, and the Institute of Medicine3–6 have identified the development of a robust palliative care delivery system as a key public health issue because of the documented ability of palliative care to deliver effective and efficient patient- and symptom-focused care to a growing population in need.In its 2013 report the American Public Health Association specifically detailed the public health implications of palliative care, acknowledged the growing burden of advanced chronic illness and disease in older adults, and recommended key steps to address the problem. This policy statement called for federal, state, and local efforts to promote effective symptom management in populations with serious illness or at the end of life. Other recommended initiatives included the development of a palliative care workforce, educational programs to improve uptake and use of palliative and hospice care, and research funding to support the expansion of palliative care initiatives. Achieving these goals will require moving beyond traditional medical practices to include both policies and initiatives at the public health level.Despite the potential of palliative care to address the mental and physical health needs of individuals with advanced illness, significant knowledge gaps impede its reach and effectiveness. Reports from scientific bodies and consensus workshops have highlighted weaknesses in the literature and called for more research on palliative care and improved research methods.7–10 Thus, although both interest in and demand for palliative care are increasing, reviews of the knowledge base continue to lament the lack of research on many key issues.11,12Especially urgent is a research agenda that fits most closely with the needs of providers who deliver palliative care. The systematic engagement of community practitioners in a consensus process can lead to particularly useful and actionable recommendations for research,13–15 which are greatly needed at this stage in the development of the field. Therefore, to shed new light on research priorities in palliative care, we used a structured, participatory method designed to solicit practitioner input on research priorities: the research-to-practice consensus workshop (RTP) model.16We employed the RTP approach to identify knowledge gaps and types of studies that should be conducted to improve providers’ ability to deliver palliative care most effectively. This model harnesses practice wisdom by engaging clinicians, agency staff, and other practitioners with researchers in a process of articulating and refining research questions and research priorities that honors scientific expertise and practice wisdom.