Construct and predictive validity of a self-reported measure of preclinical mobility limitation

OBJECTIVES: To validate self-reported preclinical mobility limitation concept and self-report assessment method against muscle power and walking speed, and to study the predictive validity of preclinical mobility limitation with respect to future risk of manifest mobility limitation. DESIGN: Observational prospective cohort study and cross-sectional analysis. SETTING: Research laboratory and community. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 632 community-living (age range, 75-81 y) women and men took part in the baseline assessments and 302 persons in the semi-annual interviews on mobility limitation over 2 years. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Walking speed, muscle power, and self-reported preclinical and manifest mobility limitation. Preclinical mobility limitation was defined as self-reported tiredness or modification of task performance without task difficulty. At baseline, 4 subgroups were created according to self-reported preclinical mobility limitation in any of 3 mobility tasks (walking 2 km, walking 0.5 km, climbing up stairs): no limitation, preclinical limitation, and minor and major manifest limitation. RESULTS: At baseline, participants with preclinical mobility limitation showed intermediate levels of walking speed and muscle power, compared with those with no limitation or manifest mobility limitation. Participants reporting baseline preclinical mobility limitation had 3- to 6-fold higher age- and sex-adjusted risk of progressing to major manifest mobility limitation during the 2-year follow-up compared with participants with no limitation at baseline, whereas the risk among those with minor limitation at baseline was 14- to 18-fold higher compared with those with no limitation. CONCLUSIONS: The self-report assessment tool proved to be a valid measure to capture the early signs of disability and may serve as an inexpensive tool for identifying those nondisabled persons at high risk for future disability.     

Health‐related quality of life after kidney transplantation: who benefits the most?

The influence of dialysis modalities on HRQoL before and after kidney transplantation (KT) and the role of adherence to medication on HRQoL have not been fully studied. Sixty four dialysis patients who answered the 15D HRQoL survey during dialysis were surveyed again after KT. Adherence and employment were also investigated. The mean 15D score was highest among home hemodialysis patients (HHD) and lowest among in‐center hemodialysis patients (icHD). After KT, the mean 15D score improved significantly in 78.6% of peritoneal dialysis patients (PD), 47.6% of HHD, and 53.8% of icHD. Then, mean 15D score remained unchanged in 28.6% of HHD and in 23.1% of icHD patients. A deterioration in the 15D score occurred in 14.3% of PD, 23.1% of icHD, and 23.8% of HHD patients, and this was influenced by the number of pills (P = 0.04). Adherence to medication was the lowest in PD, timing being the most challenging task showing a connection to higher creatinine concentration (never forgot 1.41 mg/dl vs. forgot 2.08 mg/dl P = 0.05). Employed patients had a higher mean 15D score. The icHD and PD patients benefited the most from KT and HHD the least. Low pill burden and employment were linked to a better HRQoL.     

Late gadolinium enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance of lamin A/C gene mutation related dilated cardiomyopathy

Background

The purpose of this study was to identify early features of lamin A/C gene mutation related dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) with cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). We characterise myocardial and functional findings in carriers of lamin A/C mutation to facilitate the recognition of these patients using this method. We also investigated the connection between myocardial fibrosis and conduction abnormalities.

Methods

Seventeen lamin A/C mutation carriers underwent CMR. Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) and cine images were performed to evaluate myocardial fibrosis, regional wall motion, longitudinal myocardial function, global function and volumetry of both ventricles. The location, pattern and extent of enhancement in the left ventricle (LV) myocardium were visually estimated.

Results

Patients had LV myocardial fibrosis in 88% of cases. Segmental wall motion abnormalities correlated strongly with the degree of enhancement. Myocardial enhancement was associated with conduction abnormalities. Sixty-nine percent of our asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic patients showed mild ventricular dilatation, systolic failure or both in global ventricular analysis. Decreased longitudinal systolic LV function was observed in 53% of patients.

Conclusions

Cardiac conduction abnormalities, mildly dilated LV and depressed systolic dysfunction are common in DCM caused by a lamin A/C gene mutation. However, other cardiac diseases may produce similar symptoms. CMR is an accurate tool to determine the typical cardiac involvement in lamin A/C cardiomyopathy and may help to initiate early treatment in this malignant familiar form of DCM.     

Children with Functional Motor Limitations: The Effects on Family Strengths

Sixty children with functional motor limitations (age range from 15months to 7years 3months) and their parents participated in the study. The objective was to explore the relationship of the severity of their restrictions on family strengths. Functional motor abilities of the children were assessed using Autti-Ramos Scale. Cognitive functions were assessed using the Swedish standardized version of the Griffiths Scales of Mental Development. Family strengths were indexed using the Family Functioning Style Scale. The social-economical status, childrens age and caretakers age were taken into account. Overall, the results indicated that family strengths were rather strong. Only families rearing a child with severe participation limitations (functional motor limitations and cognitive difficulties) showed less strengths concerning family identity and internal coping relative to families with a child with milder participation limitations.This research has been made possible by the grants of theTampere University Foundation and Medical Research Fund of Tampere University Hospital, Finland. We thank Matti Koivikko, MD, PhD, and Markku Ojanen, PhD, for their critical comments.