The Authors for the Live Organ Donor Consensus Group
JAMA. 2000;284:2919-2926.
Objective To recommend practice guidelines for transplantphysicians, primary care providers, health care planners, andall those who are concerned about the well-being of the liveorgan donor.
Participants An executive group representing the NationalKidney Foundation, and the American Societies of Transplantation,Transplant Surgeons, and Nephrology formed a steering committeeof 12 members to evaluate current practices of living donortransplantation of the kidney, pancreas, liver, intestine, andlung. The steering committee subsequently assembled more than100 representatives of the transplant community (physicians,nurses, ethicists, psychologists, lawyers, scientists, socialworkers, transplant recipients, and living donors) at a nationalconference held June 1-2, 2000, in Kansas City, Mo.
Consensus Process Attendees participated in 7 assignedwork groups. Three were organ specific (lung, liver, and kidney)and 4 were focused on social and ethical concerns (informedconsent, donor source, psychosocial issues, and live organ donorregistry). Work groups' deliberations were structured by a seriesof questions developed by the steering committee. Each workgroup presented its deliberations to an open plenary sessionof all attendees. This information was stored and shaped intoa statement circulated electronically to all attendees for theircomments, and finally approved by the steering committee forpublication. The term consensus is not meant to convey universalagreement of the participants. The statement identifies issuesof controversy; however, the wording of the entire statementis a consensus by approval of all attendees.
Conclusion The person who gives consent to be a live organdonor should be competent, willing to donate, free from coercion,medically and psychosocially suitable, fully informed of therisks and benefits as a donor, and fully informed of the risks,benefits, and alternative treatment available to the recipient.The benefits to both donor and recipient must outweigh the risksassociated with the donation and transplantation of the livingdonor organ.
In the framework of EUROCARE, a concerted action between 45 population-based cancer registries, in 17 European countries, survival of patients with primary malignant brain tumours was investigated. Survival analysis was carried out on 16 268 patients diagnosed between 1985 and 1989 and followed-up for at least 5 years. The mean European age-standardised 5-year relative survival was 17% in men and 20% in women, with minimal intercountry variations, except for markedly lower rates in Scotland, Estonia and Poland. The age-specific analysis showed a relatively uniform survival in patients aged more than 65 years at diagnosis, but there were more marked intercountry differences in younger patients. In the 15–44 year age group (25% of the total study population) 5-year relative survival ranged between 55% (Finland and Sweden) and 27% (Poland). Generally, survival decreased with increasing age at diagnosis. The analysis of a temporal trend in survival was carried out on a subset of registries with available data from 1978–1989. Overall, there was an increase in survival over the considered study period, mostly confined to 1-year survival, suggesting that it was mostly related to improved diagnostic techniques. The most important survival increase occurred in the younger patients, both for 1- and 5-year survival, suggesting that younger patients have less biologically aggressive tumours, benefiting from the combined effect of diagnostic accuracy and effective therapies. The most marked survival increase was seen in England and Denmark, countries with low survival rates at the beginning of the study period, whereas in Finland and Germany, where survival was relatively high to begin with, no important temporal trend was seen. 相似文献
The last international consensus conference about hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment emphasized the importance of treatment
for persons coinfected with HCV and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). As liver biopsy precedes treatment, we aimed to identify
factors associated with the performance of liver biopsy among HIV-HCV coinfected drug users during a 5-year follow-up to study
their access to HCV treatment. Of the 296 patients followed in the HIV hospital departments of Nice and Marseilles and with
retrievable records about HCV diagnosis and care, 166 were eligible for analysis having had detectable HCV RNA at least once
during the study period. Overall, 45.2% of patients underwent liver biopsy during follow-up. Using proportional hazard models,
predictors of having had a liver biopsy were high social support, complete abstinence from drug injection, and lack of immunosuppression
as well as male gender, no history of multiple incarcerations, more recent onset of drug use, and an increase of liver enzyme
levels. These results suggest that specific efforts should be devoted to HIV-HCV coinfected drug users to assist with stabilizing
these patients to optimize their access to HCV care whenever possible.
The MANIF 2000 study group includes C. Boirot, A. D. Bouhnik, M. P. Carrieri, J. P. Cassuto, M. Chesney, P. Dellamonica, P.
Dujardin, S. Duran, J. G. Fuzibet, H. Gallais, J. A. Gastaut, G. Lepeu, D. A. Loundou, C. Marimoutou, D. Mechali, J. P. Moatti,
J. Moreau, M. Nègre, Y. Obadia, I. Poizot-Martin, C. Pradier, D. Rey, C. Rouzioux, A. Sobel, B. Spire, F. Trémolières, and
D. Vlahov. 相似文献
This paper introduces the guidelines for treatment of ulcerative colitis in children, created by the working group of the Japanese Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (Chair: Yuichiro Yamashiro) and the Japanese Society for Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) (Chair: Akio Kobayashi). The ideas of the working group, with regard to the fundamental differences in medical treatment between children and adults, included: (1) for children, intensive medical treatment including appropriate systemic management is important during the acute phase of illness. (2) Treatment with steroids, which can cause growth disturbances, should not be continued for long periods of time. (3) Pulsed steroid therapy, selective removal of blood cells, and intravenous infusion of cyclosporin should be included in the therapeutic option for severe and fluminant cases. 相似文献