Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in childhood brainstem lesions

Background Diagnosis of brainstem lesions in children based on magnetic resonance imaging alone is a challenging problem. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) is a noninvasive technique for spatial characterization of biochemical markers in tissues and gives information regarding cell membrane proliferation, neuronal damage, and energy metabolism. Methods We measured the concentrations of biochemical markers in five children with brainstem lesions and evaluated their potential diagnostic significance. Images and spectra were acquired on a 1.5-T imager. The concentrations of N-acetylaspartate, tetramethylamines (e.g., choline), creatine, phosphocreatine, lactate, and lipids were measured within lesions located at the brainstem using Point-resolved spectroscopy sequences. Results Diagnosis based on localized proton spectroscopy included brainstem glioma, brainstem encephalitis, demyelination, dysmyelination secondary to neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF 1), and possible infection or radiation necrosis. In all but one patient, diagnosis was confirmed by biopsy or by clinical follow-up. Conclusions This small sample of patients suggests that MRS is important in the differential diagnosis between proliferative and nonproliferative lesions in patients without neurofibromatosis. Unfortunately, in cases of NF 1, MRS can have a rather misdiagnosis role.     

Tooth movement and cytokines in gingival crevicular fluid and whole blood in growing and adult subjects.

INTRODUCTION: Tooth movement has been studied largely with respect to the force required for tipping when pressure distribution varies along the length of the periodontal ligament. But important factors for effective canine translation include the nature and magnitude of applied stress and the patient's cell biology. The purpose of this research was to test 3 hypotheses: (1) the velocity of tooth translation (v(t)) is related to applied stress and growth status, (2) a threshold of stress accounts for the lag phase, and (3) v(t) is correlated with the ratio (AI) of 2 cytokines (IL-1beta, IL-1RA) measured in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) and stimulated whole blood (SWB). METHODS: Continuous maxillary canine retraction stresses of 13 kPa and 4, 26, or 52 kPa were applied bilaterally in 6 growing and 4 adult subjects for 84 days. Dental models and GCF samples were collected at 1- to 14-day intervals. Cytokines were measured in GCF and SWB cell cultures. RESULTS: V(t) was positively related to stress and was higher in growing subjects (P = .001). It was also related to AI(GCF) in growers (R2= 0.56) and nongrowers (R2= 0.72). Canines moved with 52 kPa showed a lag phase, and postlag phase AI(GCF) was twice that of lag phase AI(GCF). Mean v(t) and associated AI(GCF) during the postlag phase were nearly double the values for canines moved with 13 and 26 kPa. SWB production of cytokines was dose-dependent. For growing subjects, SWB IL-1RA was correlated with v(t) (R = 0.70-0.72), and AI(SWB) and IL-1beta concentrations were correlated with AI(GCF) (R = 0.73-0.78). CONCLUSIONS: V(t) varied with growth status and stresses < or = 52 kPa; stresses of < 52 kPa showed no lag phase; and equivalent stresses yielded subject-dependent differences in v(t), which correlated with cytokines in GCF and SWB.     

UVA solarium versus UVB phototherapy of atopic dermatitis: a paired-comparison study

In a paired-comparison study, 21 patients suffering from atopic dermatitis were treated with fluorescent tubes radiating mainly ultraviolet A (UVA) on one half of the body and with tubes radiating mainly UVB on the other. Treatment was given three times a week for up to 8 weeks. Eight variables reflecting disease status were recorded and the sum of these comprised the total score. The total score and the overall evaluation score were better with UVA therapy (P less than 0.02 and P = 0.01, respectively). No statistically significant difference for the pruritus score was found. The reduction in extent of dermatitis, seen with both therapies, was more pronounced with UVA (P less than 0.05). Differences in the healing score were not statistically significant. Treatment with UVA resulted in healing or considerable improvement in 15 patients and 13 patients showed improvement when treated with UVB. A better result was found with UVA in 10 subjects and with UVB in two subjects. Equal results occurred with both UVA and UVB in nine of the patients although most preferred UVA treatment.