The TNF-863A allele strongly associates with anticentromere antibody positivity in scleroderma

OBJECTIVE: Scleroderma is characterized by the presence of 3 predominant, yet almost mutually exclusive, antibodies: anticentromere antibody (ACA), antitopoisomerase antibody, and anti-RNA polymerase antibody. The purpose of this study was to investigate tumor necrosis factor (TNF) polymorphisms in scleroderma, with the specific aim of determining whether TNF polymorphisms would prove to be stronger markers for ACA than class II major histocompatibility complex (MHC). METHODS: We studied 214 UK white scleroderma patients and 354 healthy controls. All subjects were investigated for 5 TNF promoter region polymorphisms by sequence-specific polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: We showed that an NF-kappaB binding site polymorphism (known to be functionally relevant) in the TNF promoter region was present in 51.8% of patients with ACA and 16.3% of patients without ACA (chi(2) = 25.1, P = 0.000004 [corrected P = 0.00002]). Using haplotype mapping, we showed that this was a primary TNF association that could explain the previous weak links between ACA production and class II MHC alleles. In marked contrast to our ACA results, HLA class II (especially DRB1*11) appeared to be primary in that it could explain the weaker TNF association with antitopoisomerase production. Further, we observed a separate TNF haplotype to be associated with scleroderma per se, although the level of significance was much lower (chi(2) = 8.7, P = 0.003 [corrected P = 0.02]). CONCLUSION: We believe these findings may have importance both for the directional pathogenesis of scleroderma progression and for the treatment of scleroderma with anti-TNF agents.     

Mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome: Australian clinical practice statement

Primary cutaneous lymphomas represent a heterogeneous group of T‐ and B‐cell lymphomas with distinct clinical presentations, histopathologic features, treatment approaches and outcomes. The cutaneous T‐cell lymphomas, which include mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome, account for the majority of the cutaneous lymphomas. This Clinical Practice Statement is reflective of the current clinical practice in Australia. An expanded form of the Clinical Practice Statement (and updates), along with helpful patient resources and access to support groups, can be found at the following ( http://www.australasianlymphomaalliance.org.au ).     

Bayesian characterization of uncertainty in intra-subject non-rigid registration

In settings where high-level inferences are made based on registered image data, the registration uncertainty can contain important information. In this article, we propose a Bayesian non-rigid registration framework where conventional dissimilarity and regularization energies can be included in the likelihood and the prior distribution on deformations respectively through the use of Boltzmann’s distribution. The posterior distribution is characterized using Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods with the effect of the Boltzmann temperature hyper-parameters marginalized under broad uninformative hyper-prior distributions. The MCMC chain permits estimation of the most likely deformation as well as the associated uncertainty. On synthetic examples, we demonstrate the ability of the method to identify the maximum a posteriori estimate and the associated posterior uncertainty, and demonstrate that the posterior distribution can be non-Gaussian. Additionally, results from registering clinical data acquired during neurosurgery for resection of brain tumor are provided; we compare the method to single transformation results from a deterministic optimizer and introduce methods that summarize the high-dimensional uncertainty. At the site of resection, the registration uncertainty increases and the marginal distribution on deformations is shown to be multi-modal.     

Clinical stakeholders’ opinions on the use of selective decontamination of the digestive tract in critically ill patients in intensive care units: an international Delphi study

Introduction

Selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) is a prophylactic antibiotic regimen that is not widely used in practice. We aimed to describe the opinions of key ‘stakeholders’ about the validity of the existing evidence base, likely consequences of implementation, relative importance of their opinions in influencing overall practice, likely barriers to implementation and perceptions of the requirement for further research to inform the decision about whether to embark on a further large randomised controlled trial.

Methods

This was a Delphi study informed by comprehensive framework of possible determinants of health professionals’ behaviour to study Critical Care practice in four countries. There were four key stakeholder participant groups including ICU physicians, pharmacists, clinical leads, and clinical microbiologists/ infectious disease physicians. Round one comprised participant interviews and Rounds two and three were online questionnaires using Delphi method.

Results

In this study, 141 participants were recruited of whom 82% were retained. Participants rated themselves as knowledgeable about SDD. Antibiotic resistance was identified as the most important issue. SDD was seen as a low clinical priority but few participants reported strong opposition. There was moderate agreement that research to date has not adequately addressed concerns about antibiotic resistance and lacks generalizability. Participants indicated equipoise with regard to benefits and harms of SDD, and indicated strong support for a further randomised trial.

Conclusions

Clinicians have clinical equipoise about the effectiveness of SDD. Future research requires longer follow up to assess antibiotic resistance as well as greater validity/generalizability to provide definitive answers on the effectiveness of decontamination and effects on antibiotic resistance. SDD was regarded as not being a high clinical priority, which may limit future trial participation. These results have identified that further large randomised controlled trial of SDD in critical care is both warranted and appropriate.     

Administering Ziconotide and Monitoring Patients Treated with Ziconotide: Expert Opinions

Some patients with chronic pain who are intolerant of or refractory to treatment with systemic analgesics may benefit from intrathecal therapy. Ziconotide is the first nonopioid analgesic approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for intrathecal administration. Several randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of ziconotide. However, the maximum recommended dosing and titration schedule provided in the prescribing information may be too aggressive for some patients, and experience has demonstrated that ziconotide is better tolerated with slower titration to a lower maximum dose. Efficacy can be assessed by an evaluation of changes in pain, functionality, and quality of life. Cognitive adverse events may be subtle; therefore, it is important that health care professionals not only monitor patients for signs and symptoms of cognitive adverse events, but also teach family members how to do the same. Careful patient assessment and monitoring can help optimize the potential benefit from treatment with ziconotide.