Red cell membrane stiffness in iron deficiency

The purpose of this study was to characterize red blood cell (RBC) deformability by iron deficiency. We measured RBC deformability to ektacytometry, a laser diffraction method for determining the elongation of suspended red cells subjected to shear stress. Isotonic deformability of RBC from iron-deficient human subjects was consistently and significantly lower than that of normal controls. In groups of rats with severe and moderate dietary iron deficiency, RBC deformability was also reduced in proportion to the severity of iron deficiency. At any given shear stress value, deformability of resealed RBC ghosts from both iron-deficient humans and rats was lower than that of control ghosts. However, increase of applied shear stress resulted in progressive increase in ghost deformation, indicating that ghost deformability was primarily limited by membrane stiffness rather than by reduced surface area-to-volume ratio. This was consistent with the finding that iron-deficient cells had a normal membrane surface area. In addition, the reduced mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC) and buoyant density of the iron-deficient rat cells indicated that a high hemoglobin concentration was not responsible for impaired whole cell deformability. Biochemical studies of rat RBC showed increased membrane lipid and protein crosslinking and reduced intracellular cation content, findings that are consistent with in vivo peroxidative damage. RBC from iron-deficient rats incubated in vitro with hydrogen peroxide showed increased generation of malonyldialdehyde, an end-product of lipid peroxidation, compared to control RBC. Taken together, these findings suggest that peroxidation could contribute in part to increased membrane stiffness in iron- deficient RBC. This reduced membrane deformability may in turn contribute to impaired red cell survival in iron deficiency.     

Comparison of patient reported outcomes after Triathlon? and Kinemax Plus prostheses

INTRODUCTION

The Triathlon^® (Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI, US) total knee replacement was designed to improve patient function and survivorship. The aim of this study was to determine whether the Triathlon^® prosthesis produces better patient reported outcomes than a previous design by the same manufacturer, the Kinemax Plus.

METHODS

The outcome of 233 knees of patients with a mean age of 68 years (range: 40–80 years) who received the Kinemax Plus prosthesis were compared with the outcomes of 220 knees of patients with a mean age of 70 years (range: 42–90 years) who received the Triathlon^® prosthesis. Data were collected via postal questionnaire prior to surgery as well as at 8–12 weeks and at 1 year following surgery. Validated questionnaires were used including the WOMAC^® (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities) pain and function scales, the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score quality of life scale and the self-administered patient satisfaction scale.

RESULTS

This study found that patients who had the Triathlon^® prosthesis had significantly better pain relief (p<0.0001), function (p=0.028), knee related quality of life (p<0.0001) and satisfaction (p=0.0003) at three months after surgery than those who received the Kinemax Plus prosthesis. In addition, knee related quality of life (p=0.002) and satisfaction (p=0.021) were significantly higher at one year after surgery in Triathlon^® patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest that return to function and reduction in pain may occur more quickly in patients with a Triathlon^® prosthesis than in those with the Kinemax Plus.