Temporal Trends,Practice Patterns,and Treatment Outcomes for Infected Upper Urinary Tract Stones in the United States

Background

The incidence of infected urolithiasis is unknown, and evidence describing the optimal management strategy for obstruction is equivocal.

Objective

To examine the trends of infected urolithiasis in the United States, the practice patterns of competing treatment modalities, and to compare adverse outcomes.

Design, setting, and participants

A weighted estimate of 396 385 adult patients hospitalized with infected urolithiasis was extracted from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, 1999–2009.

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis

Time trend analysis examined the incidence of infected urolithiasis and associated sepsis, as well as rates of retrograde ureteral catheterization and percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) for urgent/emergent decompression. Propensity-score matching compared the rates of adverse outcomes between approaches.

Results and limitations

Between 1999 and 2009, the incidence of infected urolithiasis in women increased from 15.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], 15.3–15.6) to 27.6 (27.4–27.8)/100 000); men increased from 7.8 (7.7–7.9) to 12.1 (12.0–12.3)/100 000. Rates of associated sepsis increased from 6.9% to 8.5% (p = 0.013), and severe sepsis increased from 1.7% to 3.2% (p < 0.001); mortality rates remained stable at 0.25–0.20% (p = 0.150). Among those undergoing immediate decompression, 113 459 (28.6%), PCN utilization decreased from 16.1% to 11.2% (p = 0.001), with significant regional variability. In matched analysis, PCN showed higher rates of sepsis (odds ratio [OR]: 1.63; 95% CI, 1.52–1.74), severe sepsis (OR: 2.28; 95% CI, 2.06–2.52), prolonged length of stay (OR: 3.18; 95% CI, 3.01–3.34), elevated hospital charges (OR: 2.71; 95%CI, 2.57–2.85), and mortality (OR: 3.14; 95%CI, 13–4.63). However, observational data preclude the assessment of timing between outcome and intervention, and disease severity.

Conclusions

Between 1999 and 2009, women were twice as likely to have infected urolithiasis. Rates of associated sepsis and severe sepsis increased, but mortality rates remained stable. Analysis of competing treatment strategies for immediate decompression demonstrates decreasing utilization of PCN, which showed higher rates of adverse outcomes. These findings should be viewed as preliminary and hypothesis generating, demonstrating the pressing need for further study.     

Thromboprophylaxis patterns,risk factors,and outcomes of care in the medically ill patient population

Introduction

Medically ill, hospitalized patients are at increased risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) after discharge. This study aimed to examine thromboprophylaxis patterns, risk factors, and post-discharge outcomes.

Methods

This was a retrospective claims analysis involving administrative claims data and in-patient data abstracted from a sample of hospital charts. Patients aged ≥ 40 years hospitalized for ≥ 2 days for nonsurgical reasons between 2005 and 2009 were included. Hospital chart data were abstracted for a random sample of patients without evidence of anticoagulant use at 30 days post-discharge. The combined data determined whether in-patient thromboprophylaxis (anticoagulant or mechanical prophylaxis) reduces risk of VTE at 90 days post-discharge. Hazard ratios (HR) and odds ratios (OR) were calculated using Cox proportional hazard models and logistic regression.

Results

Of 141,628 patients in the claims analysis, 3.9% received anticoagulants (3.6% warfarin). VTE, rehospitalization, and mortality rates were 1.9%, 17.2%, and 6.2%, respectively. The strongest predictors of post-discharge VTE were history of VTE (HR = 4.0, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.3-4.8), and rehospitalization (HR = 3.9, 95% CI: 3.6-4.3). Of 504 medical charts, 209 (41.5%) reported in-patient thromboprophylaxis. There was no statistically significant difference in post-discharge VTE rates between patients who did and did not receive in-patient thromboprophylaxis. All-cause mortality was greater among patients without use of VTE prophylaxis.

Conclusion

Utilization rates of in-hospital and post-discharge VTE prophylaxis were low. In-hospital VTE prophylaxis did not reduce the risk of post-discharge VTE in the absence of post-discharge anticoagulation. Combined in-patient and post-discharge thromboprophylaxis lowered the odds of short-term, all-cause post-discharge mortality.     

Does Exposure to Stressors Predict Changes in Physiological Dysregulation?

Background

The allostatic load framework implies that cumulative exposure to stressors results in multi-system physiological dysregulation.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of stress burden on subsequent changes (2000–2006) in physiological dysregulation.

Methods

Data came from a population-based cohort study in Taiwan (n?=?521, aged 54+ in 2000, re-examined in 2006). Measures of stressful events and chronic strain were based on questions asked in 1996, 1999, and 2000. A measure of trauma was based on exposure to the 1999 earthquake. Dysregulation was based on 17 biomarkers (e.g., metabolic, inflammatory, neuroendocrine).

Results

There were some small effects among men: chronic strain was associated with subsequent increases in dysregulation (standardized β?=?0.08, 95 % CI?=?0.01 to 0.20), particularly inflammation; life events were also associated with increased inflammation (β?=?0.10, CI?=?0.01 to 0.26). There were no significant effects in women.

Conclusions

We found weak evidence that stress burden is associated with changes in dysregulation.     

Setting Up a Successful Vagus Nerve Stimulation Service for Patients With Difficult-to-Treat Depression

BackgroundA substantial number of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) do not sufficiently remit after the first lines of antidepressant treatments, making them vulnerable to poor clinical outcomes. Patients who have not had adequate resolution of their depressive symptoms after four antidepressant treatments and/or have been experiencing their current episode of MDD for two years or more (with insufficient responses to adequate antidepressant treatments) should be evaluated for antidepressant vagus nerve stimulation (VNS Therapy). Adjunctive VNS Therapy is a promising long-term treatment option for patients with difficult-to-treat depression (DTD), offering significantly improved remission rates in comparison with usual treatments. However, VNS Therapy requires specialized treatment centers to support patients.Materials and MethodsIn this narrative review, we aim to outline the necessary steps for setting up an antidepressant VNS Therapy service in an efficient manner.ResultsEstablishing a VNS Therapy service requires several high-level considerations: initiation of a collaborative multidisciplinary team of health care professionals; developing a surgical pathway for implantation; consideration of reimbursement and health care coverage; setting up a specialist clinic to identify optimal candidates for VNS Therapy; educating patients and their families about VNS Therapy; and training health care providers on patient-specific VNS Therapy treatment and long-term treatment management.ConclusionsAntidepressant VNS Therapy is a promising treatment option for the long-term treatment of patients with DTD. We have successfully initiated four VNS Therapy service centers for DTD in the United States, Austria, and Germany. Based on our experiences and lessons learned, herein, we have provided advice to psychiatric centers planning to set up a VNS Therapy service for their patients with DTD.