Multidisciplinary diabetes team care: the experiences of young adults with Type 1 diabetes

Background

This research examined whether young adults with Type 1 diabetes engage with the multidisciplinary consultation process and if not, then why.

Methods

We designed a web‐based self‐reported survey, available online from February to May 2011, for Australian adults 18–35 years with Type 1 diabetes. Respondents were asked about which clinicians they consulted to assist with self‐management. To expand on the results of the survey, we interviewed 33 respondents.

Results

Survey: Respondents (n = 150) consulted with the following clinicians: endocrinologist and diabetes educators: 23.3%; endocrinologist only: 18.0%; endocrinologist, diabetes educators and dieticians: 14.6%; endocrinologist, diabetes educators, dietician and general practitioners (GP): 11.3%; endocrinologist and GP: 10.6%; GP only: 4.6%; all clinicians recommended to assist with self‐management: 1.3%; 2.7% did not consult any clinician. Interview: Participants (n = 33) reported eight key disincentives to consultation with multidisciplinary clinicians. These were time constraints; provision of conflicting advice; inaccessibility of health services; variation in service standards; cost constraints; failure of clinicians to refer to other clinicians; lack of opportunity to build a therapeutic relationship; and failure of clinicians to engage in shared decision making.

Conclusion

Our results indicate that high attrition rates of young adults with Type 1 diabetes from recommended diabetes health services is linked to the failure of those services to meet the needs and preferences of their patients. The identified needs and preferences included joint consultation with multi‐disciplinary team clinicians; flexible access to advice by email or telephone consultation; and shared decision making. Patient engagement in health‐service re‐design has implications for improved health‐service delivery and enhanced treatment outcomes.     

Behavioral change in preventive medicine

We designed and evaluated a program to teach internal medicine residents behavioral counseling skills for multiple risk factor modification. Integrating physician-patient communication, negotiation skills, and the transtheoretical model of behavior change, we used small group discussion and standardized patients. The 18 participating residents increased their ability to modify patient behavior during videotaped interviews, mean pretest/posttest score: 33.1/40.1 (Student’s pairedt test, p<.0001). Physician self-efficacy in screening for risk factors and effecting behavioral change in patients was increased (p<.0001), as were positive attitudes toward psychosocial factors (p<.003). Our teaching effectively increased the residents’ self-efficacy and performance of behavioral counseling.     

Esophageal tamponade in the management of acute variceal hemorrhage

Over a seven-year period, 138 patients with portal hypertension presented on 223 occasions with endoscopically proven acute variceal hemorrhage. Hemorrhage ceased spontaneously on 92 occasions (41%). On 126 occasions (57%) passage of the four-lumen modification of the Sengstaken-Blakemore tube was required, and hemorrhage was successfully controlled in 98%. Intubation was refused on five occasions (2%). Hemorrhage recurred during these 223 admissions on 47 occasions (21%); on 11 occasions a second rebleed occurred and on two occasions, a third. Tamponade was required during all of these rebleeds and arrest of hemorrhage was achieved in 87%. Hemorrhage in patients with poorer modified Child's grade was less likely to cease with intubation. The overall rate of control in the 186 episodes of hemorrhage requiring tamponade was 94%. There were 28 complications attributed to the use of tamponade in 186 episodes of hemorrhage (15%). On 12 occasions these complications proved fatal (6.4%). In four further patients failure of tamponade to control hemorrhage was fatal.     

Discriminant analysis of data in ulcer and nonulcer populations

The purpose of this study was to assess whether consideration of age and body weight measurements improved discrimination between normal subjects and duodenal ulcer subjects using the maximal acid output test. Seventy-seven male volunteers were the normal group, and 155 patients with surgically proven duodenal ulcers were the ulcer group. We found that the ratio of maximal acid output to actual weight gave the best discrimination between the two groups. Using this ratio, there were 45 hypersecretors in the ulcer group, and only 1 false-positive among the normal subjects. A graphic method is described which employs the ratio of acid to weight and can correctly classify two-thirds of the ulcer group. The disadvantage of this method, however, is that one-third of the control group in our series were misclassified as hypersecretors; therefore, the clinician must consider history and barium meal findings as well as this evaluation of the subject.Deceased.