Opacity versus counterprojection: an analytic intervention explored

A peculiarly effective intervention by the author's psychoanalyst is explored and discussed in terms of its implicitly expressive properties. It is placed in the context of the classical concept of opacity and more flexible Sullivanian ideas, as expanded and clarified by Havens.     

Metabolism of the leukotriene receptor antagonist 5-(2-(8-phenyloctyl)phenyl)-4,6-dithianonanedioic acid (SK&F 102922) in the guinea pig. Rearrangement of the acyl glucuronide.

A primary route of inactivation of leukotrienes and their receptor antagonists (LTRA) is metabolism by omega oxidation. SK&F 102922 [5-(2-(8-phenyloctyl)phenyl)-4,6-dithianonanedioic acid] is a LTRA that was designed to be resistant to omega oxidation. Therefore, these experiments were designed to characterize the metabolic fate of [14C]SK&F 102922. Following iv administration of SK&F 102922 (5 mg/kg), 80% of injected radioactivity was excreted in bile in 1 hr. At least five metabolites and parent (18% of administered dose) were present in bile. One metabolite (M1), which accounted for less than 10% of the excreted radioactivity, was monohydroxylated. Three metabolites (M2, M3A, and M3B), which together accounted for greater than 50% of excreted radioactivity, had mass spectra consistent with acyl glucuronides. All three metabolites were alkali labile, whereas only one metabolite (M2) was susceptible to beta-glucuronidase hydrolysis. These data indicate that M3a and M3b are nonglycosidic isomers of M2 that were formed by a nonenzymic reaction involving migration of the aglycone (SK&F 102922) from C-1 to C-2, C-3, or C-4 of glucuronic acid. The 1-O-acyl-beta-glucuronide of SK&F 102922 (M2) exhibits pH dependent rearrangement, with half-lives ranging from 1 to greater than 1000 hr. Therefore, acyl glucuronidation can account for much of the metabolic fate of SK&F 102922 and, potentially, other structurally related LTRAs or endogenous leukotrienes themselves.     

Assessing reflective writing on a pediatric clerkship by using a modified Bloom's Taxonomy.

OBJECTIVE: Reflection enables learners to analyze their experiences and capture the wisdom that lies within. Effective teaching requires reliable methods of assessment. Several methods of assessing reflective writing have been described; however, they often require significant training, and reliability has seldom been assessed. This study was designed to determine the interrater reliability of a method of assessing reflective writing by using a modified Bloom's Taxonomy. METHODS: Twenty-one third-year medical students maintained reflective journals throughout their pediatric clerkship. A coding schema based on Bloom's Taxonomy was developed to assess the level of cognitive processing evident in the journals. Journals were independently assessed by 3 raters. Percent agreement, kappa statistics, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC [2,1]) were used to assess interrater reliability. RESULTS: Three hundred eight entries from 21 journals were assessed. Percent agreement ranged from 78.2% to 100%. Kappa statistic for each level ranged from 0.57 +/- 0.04 to 0.73 +/- 0.04, and for the highest level of processing evident it ranged from 0.52 +/- .04 to 0.58 +/- 0.04. ICC (2,1) for each level of cognitive processing ranged from 0.62 (F = 6.20; P = .000) to 1.00, and for the highest level of cognitive processing evident, it was 0.79 (F = 12.42; P = .000). Substantial to almost perfect agreement was attained. CONCLUSIONS: Reflective journals allow learners to revisit their experiences for critical analysis and deeper learning. This study describes a reliable method, based on Bloom's Taxonomy, of determining whether learners have achieved higher order thinking through reflective journal writing. This method can provide a baseline for facilitating higher order processing, critical thinking, and reflective practice.