Consensus of microbiology reporting of ear swab results to primary care clinicians in patients with otitis externa

Otitis externa is a ubiquitous inflammatory disease; although it arises most commonly from an infection, there is no consensus in the UK for the reporting of ear swab culture results. This study aims to review current microbiology laboratory reporting of ear swab specimens to primary care and reach an evidence-based consensus for a reporting policy. Fifty consecutive ear swab reports were reviewed from each of 12 laboratories in the South West region to determine and discuss reporting practice. The Health Protection Agency (HPA) GP Microbiology Laboratory Use Group reviewed the underlying evidence and worked towards a consensus of expert microbiology opinion for laboratory reporting of ear swab results using a modified version of the Delphi technique. A total of 487 reports from primary care were reviewed (54% female; 46% male). Cultures most commonly yielded Pseudomonas species (36%), Staphylococcus species (21%), Streptococcus species (15%) and fungi (11%). Five reporting policies were agreed: Policy 1: Common pathogens such as group A beta-haemolytic streptococci, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus - Always reported by name with antibiotic susceptibilities. Policy 2: Pseudomonas species - Always reported, but antibiotic susceptibilities only reported in severe disease. Policy 3: Aspergillus, Candida, coliforms and Proteus species, as well as non-group A streptococci and anaerobes - Only reported if moderate numbers of colonies and it is the predominant organism present; if appropriate report antibiotic susceptibilities. Policy 4: Coagulase-negative staphylococci, diphtheroids and enterococci - Not reported by name; generic terms used and antibiotic susceptibilities not reported. Policy 5: When antibiotic susceptibilities reported these must include susceptibility to a topical antibiotic. It is suggested that laboratories should consider adopting this evidence-based reporting consensus for ear swab culture results from primary care patients with otitis externa.     

Assessment of acute reperfused myocardial infarction with delayed enhancement 64-MDCT

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of delayed enhancement 64-MDCT in the assessment of myocardial infarct size in a porcine model of acute reperfused myocardial infarction. CT can be used for noninvasive assessment of coronary artery stenosis, but to our knowledge, evaluation of myocardial viability in the subacute phase of acute myocardial infarction has not been validated. We performed delayed enhancement imaging on six domestic swine 5 days after reperfused acute myocardial infarction and assessed the relation between delayed enhancement patterns in vivo and the extent of viable and nonviable myocardium at postmortem histochemical analysis. CONCLUSION: Delayed enhancement imaging with 64-MDCT can be used for accurate assessment of the size of reperfused acute myocardial infarcts.     

MR imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma: relationship between lesion size and imaging findings, including signal intensity and dynamic enhancement patterns

PURPOSE: To assess the relationship between lesion size and MR imaging findings of pathologically-proven hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a retrospective, single-center study, 37 consecutive patients were identified between 1999 and 2005 that underwent preoperative MRI and surgical resection of HCC. A total of 47 lesions (mean size = 6.85 cm, range = 1-25 cm) were assessed for signal intensity (SI), enhancement patterns, and secondary morphologic features. Interobserver rating, percentage enhancement, and contrast-to-noise-ratio (CNR) were determined. Lesions were assessed for combinations of typical MRI features. Regression analysis was used to assess relations between MRI findings and tumor size. RESULTS: On fat-suppressed T2-weighted (T2w) fast-spin-echo, smaller lesions had lower SI compared to larger lesions (P < 0.05). In the arterial phase, smaller lesions showed significantly higher percentage enhancement compared to larger lesions (P < 0.05). In the delayed phase, smaller lesions showed less pronounced washout (P < 0.05). Heterogeneity of the lesions, including fatty infiltration, internal nodules, or mosaic pattern, was observed significantly more frequently in larger lesions (P < 0.001). The classic combination of high T2w signal, strong arterial enhancement, and delayed phase washout was present in 23 of 44 lesions (52%). CONCLUSION: Smaller HCC often showed lower SI on T2w, more intense arterial enhancement, and less pronounced delayed washout compared to larger HCC.     

The Rotterdam Study: 2010 objectives and design update

The Rotterdam Study is a prospective cohort study ongoing since 1990 in the city of Rotterdam in The Netherlands. The study targets cardiovascular, endocrine, hepatic, neurological, ophthalmic, psychiatric and respiratory diseases. As of 2008, 14,926 subjects aged 45 years or over comprise the Rotterdam Study cohort. The findings of the Rotterdam Study have been presented in close to a 1,000 research articles and reports (see www.epib.nl/rotterdamstudy). This article gives the rationale of the study and its design. It also presents a summary of the major findings and an update of the objectives and methods.     

Clinical multimorbidity and physical function in older adults: a record and health status linkage study in general practice

BACKGROUND: Multiple chronic conditions occurring in the same individual are associated with adverse health outcomes. In family practice, individuals are seen who, over time, may experience many different symptoms, illnesses and chronic diseases. Measures for defining multimorbidity, which incorporate the diverse range of health problems seen in population-based family practice, remain to be developed. We have investigated whether routinely collected consultation data could be used as the basis for a simple classification of multimorbidity that reflects an individual's overall health status. METHODS: Morbidity consultation data for 9,439 English patients aged 50 years and over in an 18-month time period were linked to their self-reported physical health status measured by Short-Form 12 at the end point. Associations between physical function and all-cause multimorbidity counts were estimated relative to single morbidity only, and between physical function and morbidity severity (185 morbidities categorized on four ordinal scales of severity) relative to persons who had not consulted about any of the 185. RESULTS: In the 18-month period, 19% had consulted for a single morbidity and 23% for six or more (a high multimorbidity count). An estimated 24% of poor physical function in the family practice consulting population may be attributable to high multimorbidity. There was an increasing strength of association between poor physical function and increasing severity of multimorbidity on all four severity scales. Estimated associations (adjusted odds ratios) of the most severe morbidity categories with poor physical function were, for each of the four scales, respectively, 5.6 for chronicity [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.4-7.1], 7.0 for time course (4.5-10.6) and 3.6 for health care use (2.0-6.6) and for patient impact (6.7; 5.2-8.8). CONCLUSIONS: Multimorbidity defined by using routinely collected family practice consultation data and classified by count and by severity was associated with poorer physical function. This approach offers the potential for systematic use of routine records to classify multimorbidity and to identify groups with high likelihood of poor physical status for needs assessment and targeted intervention.