Printed Health Information Materials: Evaluation of Readability and Suitability

Interdisciplinary collaboration and coordination of services are receiving new emphasis in Birth to Three Early Intervention programs under Part H of Public Law (PL) 102-119 (Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, formerly PL 99-457, the Education for All Handicapped Children Act). Public Health Nurses (PHNs) have historically provided health promotion services in the home to families of infants and children with special health and developmental needs, whereas other community programs have provided specific developmental and related services. Now, as the number of professional specialties involved with children with special needs increases, overlap also increases. Nursing is frequently questioned as to its unique contribution. The holistic health perspective of nursing, which integrates all aspects of the health and well-being of individuals and families, can provide especially valuable insight to the assessment, planning, and service delivery processes. Nurses need to not only participate in the planning process during the interdisciplinary planning meetings, but also to contribute their own assessment and recommendations from a nursing perspective. Under PL 102-119, the Individual Family Service Plan (IFSP) provides the framework for family-centered planning of services for the infant or young child with special needs. Developed in partnership with the family, this plan identifies strengths, resources, concerns, and priorities based on the family's determination of relevancy (Sokoly &; Dokecki, 1992). IFSP development includes formal and informal assessments by qualified professionals who provide their special expertise as shaped by the family's priorities. The health assessment and services called for within PL 102-119 are consistent with public health nursing's focus on prevention and early intervention. Health issues are basic to the definition of children with special health needs and often must be addressed before developmental goals can be...     

The Impact of Medical Terminology on Readability of Patient Education Materials

Most health-related literature is written above the reading ability of the lay audience; however, no studies to date have identified the impact of medical terms on readability of health education materials. The purpose of this study was to identify whether there was a change in calculated reading levels of patient education brochures after medical terms were removed from analysis passages. The reading levels of 5 patient education brochures were analyzed before and after removal of medical terms, using both the Fry and Simple Measure of Gobbledegook (SMOG) readability formulas. Results indicated that the reading levels for all brochures were significantly lower after removal of medical terminology, but they remained above the 5th to 6h grade level recommended by health education experts. Findings hold implications for healthcare professionals in relation to the development and evaluation of patient education materials.     

Youth Risk Assessment in Complex Agency Practice

Advancements in the delivery of community-based services and tight utilization management of high-cost treatment options result in youths with serious behavior problems receiving intervention in lower levels of care than was true ten or fifteen years ago. This shift in where services tend to be delivered necessitates enhancement of risk assessment technology. Systems, structures, tools, and practice guidelines/protocols are available to support contemporary service provision. A model of clinical risk assessment and management is elaborated that integrates multiple sources of data and interdisciplinary teamwork to prevent adverse case outcomes and to maximize potential for community safety.