Program Directors' Views of the Effect of Managed Care on Substance Abuse Programs in Southern California

This article reports the results of semi-structured interviews with substance abuse treatment (SAT) program directors (PDs) regarding the ways SAT is being influenced by managed care (MC), plans for future SAT, and strategies for decreasing costs of care. It compares findings to an earlier survey of 50 SAT PDs.

Interviews were conducted in 20 SAT programs to gather information about treatment delivery since the advent of MC, including PD responsibilities, funding source, treatment intensity, location, duration, and methods of treatment. Open-ended responses were used to gather information about current and future plans in providing SAT, and awareness of new types of treatment being planned by organizations impacted by MC.

PDs reported changes in SAT secondary to MC such as decreased treatment length, limiting of inpatient and outpatient services, and delayed treatment secondary to benefit determination. Political and economic constraints were seen as barriers to providing adequate and effective services. SAT being subsumed by mental health was viewed as problematic along with an emerging split between alcohol abuse and drug treatment. A positive emerging treatment trend was the development of targeted programs for special need groups.

PDs revealed a variety of strategies that have promoted necessary adaptations to economic and political influences within the structure of managed behavioral care. Strategies such as varying treatment length, modality, and subspecialty care reflected necessary adaptations to diverse market needs.

Managed care continues to have a tremendous impact on the delivery of SAT services. While MC has helped to contain costs, negative outcomes are decreased availability of appropriate care and overtaxing of units that have survived MC cut backs. However, special need programs have allowed SAT programs to specialize, expand, and even flourish in today's competitive SAT market. Interviews with PDs reinforced the need for maintaining quality and diversified SAT services in today's MC environment.     

Management of filamentary keratitis associated with aqueous-deficient dry eye.

PURPOSE: To review the incidence, underlying pathophysiology, and clinical features of filamentary keratitis and to identify evidence-based best-practice strategies for managing filamentary keratitis. METHODS: A comprehensive review of published literature was undertaken. Recommendations for best-practice management strategies were based on the available evidence. Three cases are presented to illustrate the clinical findings and management of patients with chronic filamentary keratitis. RESULTS: Although the evidence base is limited by the absence of well-designed studies, current evidence indicates the following: (1) Aqueous-deficient dry eye (keratoconjunctivitis sicca) is the most common ocular condition associated with filamentary keratitis. (2) Current best-practice management of filamentary keratitis involves treating the underlying dry eye and specific treatments for the corneal filaments. Proposed treatments include nonpreserved lubricants, topical steroidal and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents, and punctal plugs for aqueous-deficient dry eye as well as mechanical removal of filaments, hypertonic saline, mucolytic agents, and bandage contact lenses for the filaments. (3) Filamentary keratitis can be induced or exacerbated by contact lens wear and ocular surgical procedures such as cataract surgery and corneal graft surgery. Pre- and postoperative ocular surface management strategies should be considered in the surgical planning of patients with, or who are susceptible to, filamentary keratitis. Filamentary keratitis can also be induced and/or exacerbated by chronic use of ocular and/or systemic medications, and alternate medications or additional measures to manage the tear film and ocular surface may be required in these cases. CONCLUSIONS: Filamentary keratitis can be a chronic, recurrent, and debilitating condition. With a systemic approach to diagnosis and management, the condition can be effectively controlled and the incidence and severity of recurrences minimized.     

Short-term complications and resource utilization in matched subjects after on-pump or off-pump primary isolated coronary artery bypass.

BACKGROUND: Studies suggest that patients who undergo off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG) have fewer short-term complications and use fewer inpatient resources than do patients who undergo standard coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with extracorporeal circulation. However, dissimilarity between groups in risk factors for complications has hindered interpretation of results. OBJECTIVES: To compare the prevalence of selected complications (atrial fibrillation, stroke, reoperation, and bleeding) and inpatient resource utilization (length of stay, discharge disposition, total charges) between subjects undergoing primary isolated CABG or OPCABG who were matched with respect to key risk factors. METHODS: Retrospective, causal-comparative survey conducted in 1 center for 18 months. Patients who underwent primary isolated CABG or OPCABG were matched for sex, age (within 2 years), left ventricular ejection fraction (within 0.05), and graft-patient ratio (exact match) and compared for prevalence of new-onset atrial fibrillation, stroke, reoperation within 24 hours, and bleeding. Statistical analysis included Wilcoxon and t tests for paired comparisons. RESULTS: The sample (107 matched pairs) was 63% male, with a mean age of 66 (SD 9.5) years, a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 0.51 (SD 0.13), and a mean graft-patient ratio of 3.41 (SD 0.74). The 2 groups did not differ significantly in New York Heart Association class (P = .43), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III score (P = .22), postoperative beta-blocker use (P = .73), or comorbid conditions. None of the complications examined differed significantly between pairs. CONCLUSION: Patients with comparable risk profiles have similar prevalences of selected complications after CABG and OPCABG.