Case study in major quotation errors: a critical commentary on the Newcastle–Ottawa scale

The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) is one of many scales used to judge the quality of observational studies in systematic reviews. It was criticized for its arbitrary definitions of quality items in a commentary in 2010 in this journal. That commentary was cited 1,250 times through December 2016. We examined the citation history of this commentary in a random sample of 100 full papers citing it, according to the Web of Science. Of these, 96 were systematic reviews, none of which quoted the commentary directly. All but 2 of the 96 indirect quotations (98%) portrayed the commentary as supporting use of the NOS in systematic reviews when, in fact, the opposite was the case. It appears that the vast majority of systematic review authors who cited this commentary did not read it. Journal reviewers and editors did not recognize and correct these major quotation errors. Authors should read each source they cite to make sure their direct and indirect quotations are accurate. Reviewers and editors should do a better job of checking citations and quotations for accuracy. It might help somewhat for commentaries to include abstracts, so that the basic content can be conveyed by PubMed and other bibliographic resources.     

Optimum versus Maximum – Eine große Herausforderung für die Pflege

Switzerland has the reputation of having one of the best healthcare systems in the world. Aims, such as a high level of patient safety, efficiency and access to a high standard of healthcare are achieved for the majority of patients. According to public surveys patient expectations and satisfaction are met to a great extent but the service is costly, making it one of the most expensive healthcare systems in the world. More than 60?% of the expense is paid by private households. Since the introduction of the new Swiss diagnosis-related groups (DRG) finance system in 2012, there have been many economic changes putting more strain on the system. This poses the question of how resources and funds can be best implemented by nursing staff, to ensure high quality care and the best possible patient outcome. Flexibility, subspecialization of healthcare professionals, patients with multiple comorbidities and electronic documentation are discussed in a clinical example. In summary, a cost-efficient provision of nursing care is possible; however, demands have risen requiring a greater flexibility of nursing staff and more patient self-motivation. A significant proportion of nursing time is consumed with administrative work and electronic data management. This reduces the time available for direct patient care. New models of nursing care need to be explored and debated.     

Poor outcome after a surgically treated chondral injury on the medial femoral condyle: early evaluation with dGEMRIC and 17-year radiographic and clinical follow-up in 16 knees

Background and purpose — The optimal treatment for traumatic cartilage injuries remains unknown. Contrast-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) evaluates cartilage quality and a low dGEMRIC index may predict radiographic osteoarthritis (OA). The purpose of this study was (a) to explore the results 17 years after surgical treatment of an isolated cartilage knee injury and (b) to evaluate the predictive value of dGEMRIC.

Patients and methods — 16 knees with an isolated traumatic cartilage injury of the medial femoral condyle had cartilage repair surgery either by microfracture or autologous cartilage implantation. dGEMRIC of the injured knee was performed 2 years after surgery and radiographic examinations were performed 17 years after the operation.

Results — Radiographic OA was present in 12 of 16 knees. Irrespective of surgical method, the dGEMRIC index was lower in repair tissue compared with adjacent cartilage in the medial compartment, 237?ms vs. 312?ms (p < 0.001), which in turn had lower value than in the non-injured lateral cartilage, 312?ms vs. 354?ms (p < 0.008). The dGEMRIC index in the cartilage adjacent to the repair tissue correlated negatively with radiographic osteophyte score, r = –0.75 (p = 0.03).

Interpretation — A traumatic cartilage injury is associated with a high prevalence of OA after 17 years. The low dGEMRIC index in the repair tissue 2 years postoperatively indicates fibrocartilage of low quality. The negative correlation between the dGEMRIC index in the adjacent cartilage and future OA suggests that the quality of the surrounding cartilage influences outcome after cartilage repair surgery.