Childhood Diabetes in the Nordic Countries: A Comparison of Quality Registries

Background:In 2008 a Nordic collaboration was established between the quality registries in Denmark, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden to improve quality of care for children with diabetes. This study aimed to describe those registries and confirm that the registry variables are comparable. Selected variables were used to demonstrate outcome measurements.Methods:The organization of the registries and methodology are described. Cross-sectional data for patients between birth and 14.9 years with type 1 diabetes mellitus in 2009 (n = 6523) from 89 centers were analyzed. Variables were age, gender, and diabetic ketoacidosis at onset, together with age, gender, HbA1c, insulin regimen, and severe hypoglycemia at follow-up in 2009.Results:All 4 registries use a standardized registration at the onset of diabetes and at follow-up, conducted at the local pediatric diabetes centers. Methods for measuring HbA1c varied as did methods of registration for factors such as hypoglycemia. No differences were found between the outcomes of the clinical variables at onset. Significant variations were found at follow-up for mean HbA1c, the proportion of children with HbA1c < 57 mmol/mol (NGSP/DCCT 7.4%), (range 15-31%), the proportion with insulin pumps (range 34-55%), and the numbers with severe hypoglycemia (range 5.6-8.3/100 patient years).Conclusions:In this large unselected population from 4 Nordic countries, a high proportion did not reach their treatment target, indicating a need to improve the quality of pediatric diabetes care. International collaboration is needed to develop and harmonize quality indicators and offers possibilities to study large geographic populations, identify problems, and share knowledge.     

Heart rate variability analysis indicates preictal parasympathetic overdrive preceding seizure‐induced cardiac dysrhythmias leading to sudden unexpected death in a patient with epilepsy

Evidence for seizure‐induced cardiac dysrhythmia leading to sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) has been elusive. We present a patient with focal cortical dysplasia who has had epilepsy for 19 years and was undergoing presurgical evaluation. The patient did not have any cardiologic antecedents. During long‐term video–electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring, following a cluster of secondarily generalized tonic–clonic seizures (GTCS), the patient had prolonged postictal generalized EEG suppression, asystole, followed by arrhythmia, and the patient died despite cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Analysis of heart rate variability showed a marked increase in the parasympathetic activity during the period preceding the fatal seizures, compared with values measured 1 day and 7 months before, and also higher than the preictal values in a group of 10 patients with GTCS without SUDEP. The duration of the QTc interval was short (335–358 msec). This unfortunate case documented during video‐EEG monitoring indicates that autonomic imbalance and seizure‐induced cardiac dysrhythmias contribute to the pathomechanisms leading to SUDEP in patients at risk (short QT interval). A PowerPoint slide summarizing this article is available for download in the Supporting Information section here .     

Prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension among Canadian adults with diabetes, 2007 to 2009

Background

Prior national surveys suggested that treatment and control of hypertension were poor in individuals with diabetes. Using measured blood pressures, we estimated prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension between 2007 and 2009 among Canadians with diabetes and sought to determine whether a treatment gap still exists for individuals with diabetes.

Methods

Using data from cycle 1 of the Canadian Health Measures Survey, estimates of hypertension prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control were described and compared between individuals with and without self-reported diabetes.

Results

Three-quarters of individuals reporting diabetes also had hypertension; of these, 89% (95% confidence interval [CI], 80%-98%) were aware, 88% (95% CI, 81%-94%) were treated, and 56% (95% CI, 45%-66%) were controlled to < 130/80 mm Hg. Among those treated with pharmacotherapy, 39% (95% CI, 31%-48%) were using monotherapy, 29% (95% CI, 18%-40%) were taking 2 medications, and 31% (95% CI, 22%-39%) were taking 3 or more medications; control to < 130/80 mm Hg was achieved by 63% (95% CI, 53%-74%). Among those treated, individuals with diabetes were significantly less likely to be treated to their recommended target (< 130/80 mm Hg) compared with individuals without diabetes (< 140/90 mm Hg; odds ratio_adjusted 0.3; 95% CI, 0.2-0.6).

Conclusions

Hypertension treatment and control among people with diabetes have improved in Canada during the past 2 decades. Nonetheless, nearly half of people with diabetes are above the treatment target. Health care professionals should continue to increase their efforts in supporting patients with diabetes in achieving blood pressure control, with emphasis on lifestyle management and pharmacotherapy.