Oral malignancies in HIV disease: changes in disease presentation, increasing understanding of molecular pathogenesis, and current management.

Infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and progression to acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) are associated with a vide variety of morbidities. Local and systemic diseases can develop in association with HIV infection and may manifest themselves as malignancies of the oropharynx. Advances in HIV management, fueled by increasing understanding of molecular pathogenesis, have resulted in marked changes in the prevalence of oral malignant disease. This paper discusses recent trends in the presentation and treatment of malignancies related to HIV and AIDS with an emphasis on malignancies seen in the oral cavity.     

"Are You Talking to Me?" Confronting Behavioral Disturbances in Patients With Headache

The famous question, "Are you talking to me?," was coined by Robert DeNiro in his lead role as Travis Bickle in the Martin Scorsese classic, Taxi Driver . The phrase also characterizes the troubling encounters that many headache-treating professionals confront as they attempt to discuss serious matters of care and compliance with some of their headache patients. Although most headache patients are eager to take professional advice and guidance, there exists a minority of patients whose behavior undermines a collaborative relationship between doctor and patient. In these cases, the physician may need to directly confront this behavior in order to overcome behavioral barriers that interfere with desirable treatment outcomes. This article offers explicit means and strategies to engage difficult patients, increase the likelihood of program adherence and improvement, and develop a more satisfying doctor-patient relationship, based on clinical experience in a national referral center for difficult-to-manage headache patients.     

Gastrointestinal failure in intensive care: a retrospective clinical study in three different intensive care units in Germany and Estonia

Background  

While gastrointestinal problems are common in ICU patients with multiple organ failure, gastrointestinal failure has not been given the consideration other organ systems receive. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of gastrointestinal failure (GIF), to identify its risk factors, and to determine its association with ICU mortality.     

The Changing Faces of the Nutcracker Esophagus

Although the nutcracker esophagus, characterized by high amplitude peristaltic contractions with mean distal amplitude greater than 180 mm Hg, is the most common esophageal motility disorder associated with noncardiac chest pain, little is known about its natural history. Therefore, we reviewed the manometric tracings of 23 patients with the nutcracker esophagus who had an average of 4.6 studies during a mean period of 32 months. Ten age-matched volunteers with normal baseline manometry who had undergone multiple studies (mean 5.8) over a mean time span of 32 months served as controls. In the 17 nutcracker patients with three or more motility studies, the variability of mean distal amplitudes between studies was 41.9% +/- 4.1 (+/- SE) compared to 27.0% +/- 3.3 for the control subjects (p less than 0.01). Highest distal pressures were noted during the first study in 11 of 17 patients (65%) compared to two of 10 controls (20%). The consistency of the diagnosis of nutcracker esophagus varied considerably: four patients always had high amplitude pressures, three patients only had the nutcracker diagnosis on the initial study, and 10 patients intermittently had pressures in the nutcracker range. Overall, these 17 patients had the diagnosis of the nutcracker esophagus confirmed on only 54% of subsequent studies. Changes in motility patterns were intermittently seen in six of 23 patients: one diffuse spasm and five nonspecific motility disorders. None of the control subjects developed high amplitude contractions or changed their motility pattern on serial testing. The possible pathophysiological implications of the changing faces of the nutcracker esophagus are discussed.     

Quality of care in teaching hospitals: a literature review.

PURPOSE: To compare the quality of care in teaching hospitals with that in nonteaching hospitals. METHOD: By performing a literature review via PubMed, the author identified and surveyed 23 studies that compared the quality of care in teaching hospitals with that in nonteaching hospitals. The studies were published from 1989-2004 and in all but one case dealt exclusively with U.S. hospitals. RESULTS: The teaching hospitals studied had better-quality measures than did nonteaching hospitals in the predominant number of studies reviewed. Process measures were significantly better in teaching hospitals in seven of the eight studies where such measures were observed, and equal in the other study. Risk-adjusted mortality was lower in teaching hospitals in nine of the 15 studies using that measure, not significantly different in five, and significantly lower in nonteaching hospitals in one study (in pediatric intensive care units, even though the teaching hospitals had a better process of care). In nonmortality outcomes, teaching hospitals were better in one study using that measure; there were no significant differences in five other such studies. Major teaching hospitals had more favorable outcomes end points than did minor teaching hospitals in eight studies in which they were compared. Including only those six studies using clinical data for process analysis or risk adjustment, teaching hospitals had a better process in all six and lower adjusted mortality in five of seven studies where that measure was used. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the favorable results in teaching hospitals extended over a range of locations, conditions, and populations, including routine as well as complex conditions. However, the quality measured in these studies was not at target levels across the spectrum of hospitals. There needs to be a continuous and determined effort for improvement in all institutions. It is to be hoped that teaching hospitals will take the lead not only in continuously improving their own quality, but also in developing and evaluating ever improving methods of quality assessment.