Brucella spp. are intracellular bacteria that cause the most frequent zoonosis in the world. Although recent work has advanced the field of
Brucella vaccine development, there remains no safe human vaccine. In order to produce a safe and effective human vaccine, the immune response to
Brucella spp. requires greater understanding. Induction of
Brucella-specific CD8
+ T cells is considered an important aspect of the host response; however, the CD8
+ T-cell response is not clearly defined. Discovering the epitope containing antigens recognized by
Brucella-specific CD8
+ T cells and correlating them with microarray data will aid in determining proteins critical for vaccine development that cover a kinetic continuum during infection. Developing tools to take advantage of the BALB/c mouse model of
Brucella melitensis infection will help to clarify the correlates of immunity and improve the efficacy of this model. Two H-2
d CD8
+ T-cell epitopes have been characterized, and a group of immunogenic proteins have provoked gamma interferon production by CD8
+ T cells. RYCINSASL and NGSSSMATV induced cognate CD8
+ T cells after peptide immunization that showed specific killing in vivo. Importantly, we found by microarray analysis that the genes encoding these epitopes are differentially expressed following macrophage infection, further emphasizing that these discordant genes may play an important role in the pathogenesis of
B. melitensis infection.Brucellosis is the world''s most common zoonosis, with more than half a million new human infections each year (
44). Brucellosis has been endemic to the Mediterranean and Middle East since ancient times, since carbonized cheese and skeletal remains in Pompeii show evidence of
Brucella spp. (
8). Evidence of brucellosis also exists in the skeleton of a 2.4- to 2.8-million-year-old hominid (
16). In areas of endemicity, domestic animal brucellosis severely affects regional economies, and vaccination campaigns cannot always reach nomadic herders. Human infections occur in these regions mainly from the ingestion of infected animal products, including unpasteurized milk and fresh cheeses (
14). Antibiotic treatment exists but is costly and prolonged, lasting at least 6 weeks in moderate cases, and it may extend for years depending on complications that arise. Even after treatment, PCR data have revealed that low levels of bacteria are detectable years after the resolution of symptoms, and relapses occur in 5 to 30% of cases (
20,
30,
55,
62). In areas where brucellosis is endemic, prevention of infection via vaccine would be far more cost-effective than the regimen of antibiotics suggested by the World Health Organization (WHO). Unfortunately, this disease flies below the radar of many of the major world health agencies, and the problem is compounded by frequent misdiagnosis and under-reporting (
15,
20).Although brucellosis is eradicated from food sources here, in the post-Gulf War United States, awareness was raised to fund vaccine research concerning potential biological weapons.
Brucella melitensis,
B. abortus, and
B. suis are considered category B select agents because of the ease of aerosolization, diverse symptoms, and chronic persistence. The spectrum of disease that results from
Brucella infection suggests that
Brucella spp. could be a biological weapon in the current absence of any human vaccine (
43). Human symptoms begin with a general malaise and fever, followed by organ-specific “hot spots” of infection, for instance, endocarditis and orchitis. In the United States, infections are due to accidental infection with a live animal vaccine by veterinarians and laboratory workers. In fact, brucellosis is one of the most common laboratory-acquired infections, and the lack of a human vaccine discourages work with the agent (
20,
37,
40).Three vaccines are currently recommended by the WHO for livestock, and all of them are live-attenuated
Brucella strains:
B. abortus S-19 and RB-51 for bovine brucellosis and
B. melitensis Rev-1 for goat and sheep brucellosis. These vaccine constructs are not completely effective and pose safety risks, including abortifacient effects and residual virulence, making them unsuitable for human application (
33). Heat-killed
Brucella does not induce detectable interleukin-12 (IL-12) in vivo, and killed bacteria actively suppress IL-12 production in response to challenge with live bacteria by unknown mechanisms (
24). Studies conducted in our laboratory, and confirmed by others, have shown that subunit vaccines can confer a degree of short-term protection but have not elicited long-term effective immunity (
3,
39). Only live bacteria appear to induce cell-mediated immunity, whereas dead bacteria induce a nonprotective humoral response (
31,
36).CD4
+ T cells induce the production of IgG2 antibodies from B cells during the course of murine and ovine
B. melitensis infections (
9,
56). There is evidence that this humoral response is an indispensable aspect of the host defenses in that opsonization may be required for successful uptake by macrophages, although a humoral response is not protective (
7,
18,
31). In addition, although opsonization may result in increased bacterial uptake by macrophages, bacterial survival is unchanged (
18). Previous studies have shown that host protection can be mediated by gamma interferon (IFN-γ) produced by CD4
+ T cells, although data have also shown that treatment of macrophages with optimal concentrations of IFN-γ still allows some intracellular
Brucella to survive (
19,
26,
57,
63).
Brucella can escape complement-mediated killing and thrive inside the acidified phagosomes of macrophages, using the common bactericidal host mechanisms to its own advantage (
11,
13,
28a). In addition, major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II antigen presentation can be disrupted by
Brucella lipopolysaccharide that has incorporated into the host cell membrane (
28). In our lab and others, evidence supports that protection in animal models is engendered by CD8
+ T cells (
10,
12,
22,
27,
38,
42,
64). Therefore, we chose to investigate the
Brucella antigens that are recognized by CD8
+ T cells in the context of MHC class I molecules.In the United States, most select agent work is confined to biosafety level 3 and above, the logistics of which largely dictate the use of small-animal models in
Brucella research. Mice are not a natural host of
B. melitensis, making the optimization of this model a high priority. By exploring the CD8
+ T-cell component of the BALB/c mouse response to
B. melitensis infection, we are further refining the mouse as a valuable tool in
Brucella research and vaccine development.Determining the epitopes recognized by
Brucella-specific CD8
+ T cells and the
Brucella genes encoding the proteins containing these epitopes will help establish proteins critical for vaccine development (
47,
48,
51,
52,
60). Epitopes were predicted from the
Brucella genome using an algorithm based on allele-specific binding motifs and cleavage sites (
49,
50). Select peptides were then tested for their capacity to bind their respective MHC alleles in vitro (
54). Peptides subsequently deemed epitopes displayed a combination of immunogenicity, natural processing, and functional avidity, while eliciting CD8
+ T cells that kill in vivo. Peptide immunogenicity was evaluated using peptide pools in adjuvant, whereas natural processing and functional avidity tests used nonreplicating but metabolically active whole
B. melitensis to immunize mice. Our approach has identified the first
B. melitensis-specific MHC class I CD8
+ T-cell epitopes that are recognized in H-2
d mice and generate CD8
+ T cells that kill in vivo. These present findings offer insight regarding the debate concerning
Brucella correlates of immunity and provide guidance in designing a safe and viable human vaccine.
相似文献