Thrombocytopenia After Isolated Limb or Hepatic Perfusions with Melphalan: The Risk of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia

Background: Three cases of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) were observed in patients undergoing isolated limb perfusion (ILP) with melphalan. This occurrence prompted the discontinuation of prophylactic postoperative heparin in ILP patients and its avoidance in patients undergoing isolated hepatic perfusion (IHP). The need to reassess these decisions led to a review of thrombocytopenia in both patient populations.Methods: Records of all patients treated with ILP or IHP at our institution from July 1992 through November 1996, were reviewed. Nine IHP patients were tested prospectively for heparinrelated antibodies using serum samples obtained perioperatively and during the second postoperative week.Results: Thrombocytopenia (<100,000 platelets/L) developed postoperatively in 30% of 131 ILP patients and in 77% of 56 IHP patients. No cases of HIT were identified other than the three who had been previously diagnosed. The prevalence of HIT in heparinized ILP patients was 2.8% (3/108). All nine IHP patients developed heparin-related antibodies postoperatively.Conclusions: Because the prevalence of HIT following ILP is in the range observed in other clinical settings, postoperative heparin prophylaxis is an option. However, it probably should be limited to the first week, and daily platelet counts should be reviewed for a pattern of thrombocytopenia consistent with HIT. The prevalence of heparin-related antibodies after IHP is so high that prophylactic heparin should be avoided in this setting.     

From feedback to reciprocity. Developing a student-centered approach to course evaluation

Reforms to medical education have refocused curricula on the need to produce primary care physicians through a problem-based, student-centered, community-oriented, and integrated approach to instruction. Course evaluations, originally designed for traditional lecture-based, teacher-centered curricula, provide inadequate input from students to support curriculum planning and change and to determine appropriate mixes of educational methods. At the University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine, a unique community-centered course, called "Health, Illness and the Community," developed a student-centered course evaluation to provide adequate student input to support curriculum planning and change. A 35-item evaluation was developed to obtain data to identify student concerns, student learning styles, and preferred community agency utilization. The results suggest that student-centered course evaluation can play a role in managing and identifying key relationships in integrated and systematic courses as well as establishing a method for continual improvement.     

Surgical resection following interleukin 2 therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma prolongs remission.

Records of 399 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with interleukin 2 with or without lymphokine-activated killer cell immunotherapy enrolled in 14 separate clinical trials from multiple institutions were reviewed to determine whether patients with a partial response to interleukin 2 therapy would benefit from surgical resection of residual tumor. Sixty-two patients demonstrated objective responses (15.5%), 18 (4.5%) complete and 44 (11.0%) partial. Eleven patients underwent resection of residual tumor in the lung, kidney, retroperitoneum, or pelvis so that they had "surgically no evidence of disease" (SNED). Of these, 10 had partial responses, and one patient with progressive disease had a complete response. Comparison of response duration showed no difference between the complete response and SNED groups, but there was a significant difference between each of these groups and the partial response group. At this writing, all 11 patients in the SNED group remained alive without evidence of disease (median follow-up, 21 months). In contrast, only 14 patients (76%) with complete responses and 15 patients (35%) with partial responses remained free of disease progression. Enhanced survival of the complete response and SNED groups compared with the partial response group borders on significance and awaits longer follow-up. These data suggest that surgical resection, if technically feasible, may benefit patients who show a partial response to interleukin 2 treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma.     

Biological response modifiers in the management of rheumatoid arthritis.

The management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with biological response modifiers (BRMs) is reviewed. RA, an autoimmune disorder affecting 1-2% of the world's population, is characterized by inflammation of synovial tissues, joint swelling, stiffness, and pain that may progress to joint erosion. There is strong evidence that inflammatory mediators, such as tissue necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) and interleukin-1 (IL-1), play a critical role in the pathogenesis of this disorder. IL-1-receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra) is produced in healthy subjects and helps to protect against the adverse effects associated with IL-1 overexpression. Administration of IL-1Ra or similar agents may reduce the effects of IL-1 and ameliorate inflammatory conditions. Traditional treatment of RA has been based on symptomatic management with non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs, disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, and corticosteroids, each of which has substantial drawbacks in terms of effectiveness or adverse effects. Newer therapeutic strategies for blocking the biological effects of inflammatory cytokines include antibodies directed against TNF (e.g., infliximab), soluble receptors (e.g., etanercept) and receptor antagonists to IL-1 (anakinra) [corrected]. Clinical trials indicate that these BRMs may be more effective than traditional agents because they are able to alter joint remodeling in addition to attenuating symptoms. Anti-TNF therapies may be associated with increased risk for infections, sepsis, tuberculosis reactivation, demyelination disorders, and blood dyscrasias; anakinra appears to be safer. Combination therapy with BRMs may be more appropriate for RA than monotherapy. The role of BRMs in the treatment of RA will evolve as investigators learn more about the drugs and the disorder.     

Outcomes and Costs of Risperidone versus Olanzapine in Patients with Chronic Schizophrenia or Schizoaffective Disorders: A Markov Model

OBJECTIVE: To compare expected outcomes and costs of care in patients with chronic schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorders who are treated with risperidone versus olanzapine. METHODS: A Markov model was developed to examine outcomes and costs of care in patients with chronic schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorders receiving risperidone or olanzapine. The time frame of interest was 1 year. The model focused particular attention on the likelihood of therapy switching and discontinuation as a result of treatment-emergent side effects, as the efficacy of these two agents is similar. Measures of interest included the incidence of relapse and selected side effects including extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS), prolactin-related disorders and diabetes, expected change in body weight, and the percentage of patients remaining on initial therapy at the end of 1 year. Costs of antipsychotic therapy and psychiatric and nonpsychiatric services also were examined. RESULTS: At 1 year, the rate of EPS was estimated to be slightly higher for risperidone, as was the incidence of symptomatic prolactin-related disorders. The expected incidence of diabetes mellitus, while low, was slightly higher for olanzapine. Approximately 25% and 4% of olanzapine and risperidone patients, respectively, were projected to experience an increase in body weight > or = 7%. The estimated percentage of patients remaining on initial therapy at the end of 1 year was higher for risperidone than olanzapine (76.9% vs. 45.6%, respectively). Expected mean total costs of care per month of therapy were $2163 for risperidone and $2316 for olanzapine. Results from sensitivity analyses suggest that the probability of therapy discontinuation following weight gain >5 kg would have to be lower than 0.1 for the number of patients remaining on therapy at the end of 1 year to be the same for risperidone and olanzapine. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with risperidone, treatment with olanzapine may result in greater increases in body weight, higher rates of therapy discontinuation, and higher costs of medical-care services.