Exogenous lung surfactant: effect on radiographic appearance in premature infants

At birth, premature infants of 25-29 weeks gestation, at high risk for development of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), were given a single dose (90 mg) of calf lung surfactant extract (CLSE) by intratracheal instillation. The frequency and severity of RDS were assessed with use of a simple radiographic scoring system in which pulmonary parenchymal densities and the prominence of the air-bronchogram effect were used as indicators of widespread atelectasis. Radiographs were obtained in surfactant-treated and control infants within the first 90 minutes of life as part of an initial evaluation of their pulmonary status. Subsequent examinations were performed at less than 24 hours and less than 48 hours of age. Radiographic assessment of lung disease compared consistently with coordinated data on oxygen and mean airway pressure requirements of the infants. Both indicated a significantly decreased frequency and severity of RDS in the infants treated with surfactant. The results provide supporting evidence of the effectiveness of exogenous lung surfactant replacement in mitigating RDS in very premature infants.     

Combination therapy for anaplastic giant cell thyroid carcinoma

Since 1981, 20 patients with anaplastic giant cell carcinoma of the thyroid have been prospectively treated according to a combination regimen of chemotherapy and external beam radiation therapy. Two types of chemotherapy were used every 4 weeks, depending on the patient's age. For those younger than 65 years, a combination of doxorubicin (60 mg/m2) and cisplatin (90 mg/m2) was given, and for older patients mitoxantrone (14 mg/m2) was used. Radiotherapy was carried out between Day 10 and Day 20 of the first four cycles of chemotherapy. It delivered 17.5 Gy in 7 fractions to the neck and the superior mediastinum. Survival exceeding 20 months was observed in three patients. Complete neck tumor response was observed in five patients, among whom four had undergone previous operations. No response was seen in distant metastases, which were the cause of death in 14 patients. These treatment modalities are effective in some patients, both in terms of survival and of local control, avoiding death from local invasion. Gross tumor resection should be performed whenever possible but should not delay the commencement of this protocol. Toxicity was high and remains the main limiting factor.     

耐力训练过程中大鼠体内糖储备及胰岛激素变化与黄芪、生脉穴位注射的干预效应

目的:穴位注射疗法在临床应用较多,但在运动医学领域研究不多。观察穴位注射黄芪、生脉对耐力训练大鼠糖储备和运动能力的影响。方法:实验于2004-07在陕西师范大学完成。①实验分组:健康雄性SD大鼠32只,体质量180～220g,随机抽签法分为安静对照组、训练对照组、生理盐水组、药物注射组,每组8只。②实验方法:建立穴位注射黄芪、生脉大鼠的耐力跑台训练实验模型,安静对照组安静笼饲养。训练对照组、生理盐水组、药物注射组先于动物跑台上进行5周适应性训练,之后跑速每周递增,5d/周,共5周;然后进行2周的大强度耐力训练,30min/d,7d/周,共2周。训练对照组、生理盐水组、药物注射组第8周第1天以速度为35m/min运动至力竭。③实验评估:7周后取材测定肝糖原、肌糖原、血清胰岛素、胰高血糖素的变化。实验中对动物处置符合动物伦理学标准。结果:纳入大鼠32只,均进入结果分析。①通过大强度耐力训练,药物注射组与其他3组相比,肝糖原含量均升高(P<0.05);训练对照组肌糖原比安静对照组降低(P<0.05),生理盐水组与训练对照组相比则显著性升高(P<0.01)。②训练对照组胰岛素比安静对照组明显降低(P<0.01);生理盐水组及药物注射组都能抑制这种降低的趋势(P<0.01);药物注射组胰高血糖素较安静对照组、训练对照组要高,且有显著性差异(P<0.01)。结论:穴位注射黄芪、生脉使大强度耐力训练大鼠体内糖储备显著增加,同时可以提高胰岛激素水平,从而提高了大鼠的运动能力。     

Blood usage in lung transplantation

BACKGROUND: Few published data are available regarding perioperative blood usage in lung transplantation. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The medical records of all patients undergoing lung transplantation at a university medical center in 1994 and 1995 were reviewed. RESULTS: Ninety patients underwent lung transplantation during this period. Six patients were excluded: two received a living related-donor lung, three underwent retransplantation and one underwent concomitant repair of a tetralogy of Fallot. Of the 84 evaluable patients, 59 underwent single lung transplantation and 25 double lung transplantation. Double-lung recipients used more red cells (6.4 vs. 1.7 units, p = 0.0002) and were more likely to receive red cells, platelets, plasma, or any component (92 vs. 32%, p< or =0.0001) than were single-lung recipients. Double- lung recipients were more likely to require cardiopulmonary bypass (40 vs. 12%, p = 0.003), and cardiopulmonary bypass was associated with greater transfusion requirements (p< or =0.0001). However, among patients requiring cardiopulmonary bypass, blood use did not differ between those undergoing double lung transplantation and those undergoing single lung transplantation. In the subset of patients not requiring cardiopulmonary bypass, double-lung recipients received more red cells (4.5 vs. 0.7 units, p< or =0.0001) and more plasma (2.0 vs. 0.2 units, p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Double-lung recipients require more perioperative transfusions than single-lung recipients. The greater transfusion requirement is due to the more frequent need for cardiopulmonary bypass as well as the greater complexity of the procedure. These data are useful for developing surgical blood ordering guidelines for lung transplantation.     

Reasons for attending support groups and organizational preferences: the European scleroderma support group members survey

Purpose: The objectives were to identify reasons why patients attend scleroderma support groups and to ascertain preferences for how meetings are best organized.

Methods: The survey included 30-items on reasons for attending and nine items on organizational preferences. Patients were recruited through European patient organizations. Exploratory factor analysis was used to group reasons for attendance thematically.

Results: About 213 scleroderma patients (192 women) completed the survey. A three-factor model best described reasons for attending [χ²(348)?=?586.1, p?<?0.001; Comparative Fit Index?=?0.98; Tucker Lewis Index?=?0.97; Root Mean Square Error of Approximation?=?0.06] with themes that included: (1) obtaining interpersonal and social support, (2) learning about treatment and symptom management strategies, and (3) discussing other aspects of scleroderma. Among organizational preferences, respondents emphasized that meetings should include educational aspects and the opportunity to share information and support.

Conclusion: People with scleroderma attend support groups to give and obtain social support and for education about managing their disease and other aspects of living with scleroderma. Support groups should be structured to facilitate both educational and informational aspects and to provide opportunities for sharing and support between members.

• Implications for rehabilitation

• Local peer-led support groups are an important support and informational resource for patients living with scleroderma.

• People with scleroderma attend support groups in order to: (1) obtain interpersonal and social support, (2) learn about disease treatment and symptom management strategies, and (3) discuss other aspects of living with scleroderma outside of symptom management.

• Most support group members prefer groups with a trained facilitator, that include family members or loved ones in the groups, that include between 11and 20 members, that last between 1 and 2?h, and that meet once every 1–3 months.

• Rehabilitation professionals can support the formation and management of local support groups or can refer patients to national scleroderma patient organizations for information on support groups that they may be able to access.

     

Training and support needs of scleroderma support group facilitators: the North American Scleroderma Support Group Facilitators Survey

Purpose: Peer-facilitated support groups are an important resource for people with scleroderma, but little is known about challenges faced by support group facilitators. The objective was to identify training and support needs of scleroderma support group facilitators to inform the development of an educational training program.

Methods: A 32-item survey assessed confidence of support group facilitators to execute tasks necessary for successfully facilitating support groups. Survey items were grouped into seven themes using content analysis.

Results: Eighty North American scleroderma support group facilitators completed the survey. Facilitators were generally confident in their ability to complete tasks related to: (1) Organizing, Structuring, and Facilitating the group; (2) Addressing Individual Member Needs and Diversity of the Group; (3) Helping Members Cope with Grief and Loss; and (4) Attaining and Responding to Member Feedback. They were less confident in their ability to perform tasks related to (1) Managing Difficult Group Dynamics; (2) Promoting and Sustaining the Group; and (3) Balancing Personal and Group Needs.

Conclusion: Results suggest that a training program for scleroderma support group facilitators should address a broad range of topics, including managing difficult group interactions, promotion and maintaining the group, and balancing personal and support group needs.

• Implications for Rehabilitation

• Many patients with the rare autoimmune connective tissue disease scleroderma depend on peer-facilitated support groups for disease-related education and peer support, but the lack of training for facilitators is a barrier to forming and sustaining groups.

• Rehabilitation professionals can support the formation and management of local support groups by providing education and support to peer group facilitators or by referring them to national scleroderma organizations who are developing training resources.

• Training for support group facilitators should focus on areas where facilitators were least confident in their abilities, including managing difficult group dynamics, promoting and sustaining the group, and balancing personal and group needs.