Is Excess Calcium Harmful to Health?

Most current guidelines recommend that older adults and the elderly strive for a total calcium intake (diet and supplements) of 1,000 to 1,300 mg/day to prevent osteoporosis and fractures. Traditionally, calcium supplements have been considered safe, effective and well tolerated, but their safety has recently been questioned due to potential adverse effects on vascular disease which may increase mortality. For example, the findings from a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (currently published in abstract form only) revealed that the use of calcium supplements was associated with an ~30% increased risk of myocardial infarction. If high levels of calcium are harmful to health, this may alter current public health recommendations with regard to the use of calcium supplements for preventing osteoporosis. In this review, we provide an overview of the latest information from human observational and prospective studies, randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses related to the effects of calcium supplementation on vascular disease and related risk factors, including blood pressure, lipid and lipoprotein levels and vascular calcification.     

Summer Research Training for Medical Students: Impact on Research Self‐Efficacy

There is a well‐documented shortage of physician researchers, and numerous training programs have been launched to facilitate development of new physician scientists. Short‐term research training programs are the most practical form of research exposure for most medical students, and the summer between their first and second years of medical school is generally the longest period they can devote solely to research. The goal of short‐term training programs is to whet the students’ appetite for research and spark their interest in the field. Relatively little research has been done to test the effectiveness of short‐term research training programs. In an effort to examine short‐term effects of three different NIH‐funded summer research training programs for medical students, we assessed the trainees’ (N = 75) research self‐efficacy prior to and after the programs using an 11‐item scale. These hands‐on training programs combined experiential, didactic, and mentoring elements. The students demonstrated a significant increase in their self‐efficacy for research. Trainees’ gender, ranking of their school, type of research, and specific content of research project did not predict improvement. Effect sizes for different types of items on the scale varied, with the largest gain seen in research methodology and communication of study findings.     

Aortic Stiffness Assessed by Global Pulse Wave Velocity in Postmenopausal Women: An Ultrasonographic Study

Objective: The first goal of our study was to investigate major determinants of aortic stiffness in postmenopausal women using an echocardiographic method to calculate global pulse wave velocity (PWVg) rather than the less accurate carotid–femoral pulse wave velocity (PWVc). The second goal was to relate PWVg to the absolute risk of major cardiovascular (CV) events estimated by CV risk factors. Patients and methods: Two hundred forty‐four consecutive women who presented to our heart station were screened. One hundred twenty‐two were postmenopausal, either natural or surgical, whereas 122 were premenopausal. The mean age of the patients was 54 ± 13 years. Individuals were categorized as current smokers, former smokers, or nonsmokers and hypertensive or not. Hypercholesterolemia and diabetes mellitus were defined. Aortic stiffness was assessed by PWVg measured with pulsed Doppler, the interval between the beginning of QRS complex and the foot of the systolic upstroke in the Doppler spectral envelope was calculated at the aortic valve site and at the right common femoral artery. PWVg was calculated between the aortic valve and right common femoral artery by dividing the straight line distance between the two by the transit time. Results: There was a highly significant statistical difference (P < 0.0012) in PWVg between menstruating women and postmenopausal women. Similarly, this difference in PWVg was also noted among the menstruating population (P < 0.0014) when comparing normotensive women and hypertensive women. In postmenopausal women, PWVg was 6.8 m/sec in normotensive women and 7.56 m/sec in hypertensive women (P < 0.007). Conclusion: PWVg was increased in postmenopausal women compared with menstruating women. Systemic hypertension has an independent, but additive effect on aortic stiffness assessed by PWVg. Our study supports the usefulness of the assessment of aortic stiffness as a marker of CV disease and to identify subjects at risk at an early age.     

Open hemiarch versus clamped ascending aorta replacement for aortopathy during initial bicuspid aortic valve replacement

BackgroundThere is controversy regarding the extent of aortic resection necessary in patients with aortopathy related to bicuspid aortic valve disease. To address this issue, we reviewed our experience in patients undergoing ascending aorta replacement during bicuspid aortic valve replacement.MethodsWe reviewed 702 patients who underwent ascending aorta replacement at the time of initial nonemergent native bicuspid aortic valve replacement at our institution between January 2000 and June 2017. Treatment cohorts included an open hemiarch replacement group (n = 225; 32%) and a clamped ascending aorta replacement group (n = 477; 68%).ResultsMedian patient age was 60 years (interquartile range [IQR], 51-67 years), female sex was present in 113 patients (16%), ejection fraction was 62% (IQR, 56%-66%), and aortic arch diameter was 33 mm (IQR, 29-36 mm). Cardiopulmonary bypass time was longer in the hemiarch replacement group (188 minutes vs 97 minutes; P < .001). Procedure-related complications (36%) and mortality (<1%) were similar in the 2 groups; however, the hemiarch group had an increased odds of blood transfusion (odds ratio, 1.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15-2.28; P = .006). The median duration of follow-up was 6.0 years (95% CI, 5.3-6.8 years). Overall survival was 94 ± 1% at 5 years and 80 ± 2% at 10 years. Multivariable analysis demonstrated similar survival in the 2 groups (hazard ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.51-1.33; P = .439). No repeat aortic arch operations were done for aortopathy over the duration of clinical follow-up.ConclusionsCompared with patients in the clamped ascending aorta replacement group, patients in the hemi-arch replacement group had longer cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross-clamp times, along with an increased risk of blood transfusion, but similar freedom from repeat aortic arch operation and survival. We identified no advantage of performing hemiarch replacement in the absence of aortic arch dilation.