L-arginine reverses the antinatriuretic effect of cyclosporin in renal transplant patients

BACKGROUND: Cyclosporin has been shown to facilitate renal vasoconstriction and to have an antinatriuretic effect. The existence of an interference of cyclosporin with the vasodilating properties of endothelium mediated by nitric oxide production could mediate these effects. On the other hand, the infusion of the nitric oxide precursor L-arginine has been shown to induce renal vasodilatation and to facilitate natriuresis in normal volunteers. We have investigated the renal effects of the administration of an infusion of L-arginine in renal transplant patients chronically treated with cyclosporin. To facilitate the analysis of the data the effects of the administration of a similar dose of cyclosporin on renal function during the infusion of a vehicle were also investigated during the administration of a vehicle of L-arginine. DESIGN: Ten male renal transplant patients, chronically treated with cyclosporin and with a stable renal function were studied during 2 consecutive days after the administration of the usual morning dose of cyclosporin. The first day they received an intravenous infusion of vehicle and the second the infusion of graded doses of L-arginine (50, 100, 150 mg/kg/h) during 3 consecutive h. RESULTS: The first day, after cyclosporin administration a significant fall (P < 0.01) was observed in natriuresis and kaliuresis in the absence of changes in renal plasma flow and glomerular filtration rate. After the administration of L-arginine significant (P < 0.01) increases of renal plasma flow, glomerular filtration rate, and natriuresis were seen. The increase in blood levels of cyclosporin after its administration did not differ between days 1 and 2. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that L-arginine facilitates renal vasodilatation and natriuresis in renal transplant patients. Furthermore, the observed increase in sodium excretion could indicate that L-arginine counteracts the antinatriuretic effect of cyclosporin.      

Effect of inhaled prostaglandin D2 in normal and atopic subjects, and of pretreatment with leukotriene D4

BACKGROUND: Prostaglandin (PG) D2 is a potent bronchoconstrictor mediator and is found, together with leukotriene (LT) D4, in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid during the early response to allergen challenge in asthmatic subjects. The potency of PGD2 has not been established in normal and atopic non-asthmatic subjects, nor has the contribution of cholinergic mechanisms to PGD2 induced bronchoconstriction in normal subjects. Mediators released simultaneously may interact, so the effect of pre-inhalation of LTD4 on PGD2 responsiveness was investigated. METHODS: Six normal and six atopic non-asthmatic subjects performed histamine and PGD2 challenges on separate occasions. Eight normal subjects performed PGD2 challenges immediately before and 45 minutes after inhalation of 200 micrograms oxitropium bromide or placebo. Bronchial responsiveness to PGD2 was established in six normal subjects immediately after pretreatment with saline or non-bronchoconstricting doses of methacholine or LTD4 (challenge 1), and again at six hours (challenge 2). All studies were performed in a double blind, randomised, crossover fashion. RESULTS: PGD2 was 25-fold and 18-fold more potent as a bronchoconstrictor than histamine in atopic non-asthmatic and normal subjects, respectively. Responsiveness (PC35sGaw) to histamine and PGD2 correlated significantly (r = 0.917, n = 12, p < 0.001). Oxitropium bromide in a dose of 200 micrograms inhibited PGD2 induced bronchoconstriction by 37.5%, although in two of these subjects no inhibition was seen. Pre- inhalation of LTD4 and methacholine shifted the dose-response curve of PGD2 to the left by 4.6-fold and 2.4-fold, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: PGD2 is a potent bronchoconstrictor in normal subjects, which is partly mediated by cholinergic mechanisms in some subjects. No significant interaction was found between LTD4 and PGD2 in six normal subjects.


     

Meniscal abnormalities: prospective correlation of double-contrast arthrography and arthroscopy

In a prospective study conducted over a 12-month period, 30 patients underwent double-contrast arthrography of the knee followed by arthroscopic study. An 80% correlation rate was found between results. Arthrography had a higher rate of accuracy (93%) than arthroscopy (84%) and had a 7% false-positive and 0% false-negative rate. A commonly overlooked arthrographic sign--the triple-S or stuck sail sign--was 91% accurate in the prediction of meniscal tears. The complementary nature of the two examinations is discussed.