Targeting the Complement Serine Protease MASP-2 as a Therapeutic Strategy for Coronavirus Infections

MASP-2, mannose-binding protein-associated serine protease 2, is a key enzyme in the lectin pathway of complement activation. Hyperactivation of this protein by human coronaviruses SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 has been found to contribute to aberrant complement activation in patients, leading to aggravated lung injury with potentially fatal consequences. This hyperactivation is triggered in the lungs through a conserved, direct interaction between MASP-2 and coronavirus nucleocapsid (N) proteins. Blocking this interaction with monoclonal antibodies and interfering directly with the catalytic activity of MASP-2, have been found to alleviate coronavirus-induced lung injury both in vitro and in vivo. In this study, a virtual library of 8736 licensed drugs and clinical agents has been screened in silico according to two parallel strategies. The first strategy aims at identifying direct inhibitors of MASP-2 catalytic activity, while the second strategy focusses on finding protein-protein interaction inhibitors (PPIs) of MASP-2 and coronaviral N proteins. Such agents could represent promising support treatment options to prevent lung injury and reduce mortality rates of infections caused by both present and future-emerging coronaviruses. Forty-six drug repurposing candidates were purchased and, for the ones selected as potential direct inhibitors of MASP-2, a preliminary in vitro assay was conducted to assess their interference with the lectin pathway of complement activation. Some of the tested agents displayed a dose-response inhibitory activity of the lectin pathway, potentially providing the basis for a viable support strategy to prevent the severe complications of coronavirus infections.     

Transit time ultrasound perivascular flow probe technology is superior to MR imaging on hepatic blood flow measurement in a porcine model

Background: The hepatic hemodynamics is an essential parameter in surgical planning as well as in various disease processes. The transit time ultrasound(TTUS) perivascular flow probe technology is widely used in clinical practice to evaluate the hepatic inflow, yet invasive. The phase-contrast-MRI(PC-MRI) is not invasive and potentially applicable in assessing the hepatic blood flow. In the present study, we compared the hepatic inflow rates using the PC-MRI and the TTUS probe, and evaluated their predictive value of post-hepatectomy adverse events. Methods: Eighteen large white pigs were anaesthetized for PC-MRI and approximately 75% hepatic resection was performed under a unified protocol. The blood flow was measured in the hepatic artery(Qha), the portal vein(Qpv), and the aorta above the celiac trunk(Qca) using PC-MRI, and was compared to the TTUS probe. The Bland-Altman method was conducted and a partial least squares regression(PLS) model was implemented. Results: The mean Qpv measured in PC-MRI was 0.55 ± 0.12 L/min, and in the TTUS probe was 0.74 ± 0.17 L/min. Qca was 1.40 ± 0.47 L/min in the PC-MRI and 2.00 ± 0.60 L/min in the TTUS probe. Qha was 0.17 ± 0.10 L/min in the PC-MRI, and 0.13 ± 0.06 L/min in the TTUS probe. The Bland-Altman method revealed that the estimated bias of Qca in the PC-MRI was 32%(95% CI:-49% to 15%); Qha 17%(95% CI:-15% to 51%); and Qpv 40%(95% CI:-62% to 18%). The TTUS probe had a higher weight in predicting adverse outcomes after 75% resection compared to the PC-MRI( β= 0.35 and 0.43 vs β = 0.22 and 0.07, for tissue changes and premature death, respectively). Conclusions: There is a tendency of the PC-MRI to underestimate the flow measured by the TTUS probes. The TTUS probe measures are more predictive of relevant post-hepatectomy outcomes.     

Evaluating the Tongue-Hold Maneuver Using High-Resolution Manometry and Electromyography

The tongue-hold maneuver is a widely used clinical technique designed to increase posterior pharyngeal wall movement in individuals with dysphagia. It is hypothesized that the tongue-hold maneuver results in increased contraction of the superior pharyngeal constrictor. However, an electromyographic study of the pharynx and tongue during the tongue-hold is still needed to understand whether and how swallow muscle activity and pressure may change with this maneuver. We tested eight healthy young participants using simultaneous intramuscular electromyography with high-resolution manometry during three task conditions including (a) saliva swallow without maneuver, (b) saliva swallow with the tongue tip at the lip, and (c) saliva swallow during the tongue-hold maneuver. We tested the hypothesis that tongue and pharyngeal muscle activity would increase during the experimental tasks, but that pharyngeal pressure would remain relatively unchanged. We found that the pre-swallow magnitude of tongue, pharyngeal constrictor, and cricopharyngeus muscle activity increased. During the swallow, the magnitude and duration of tongue and pharyngeal constrictor muscle activity each increased. However, manometric pressures and durations remained unchanged. These results suggest that increased superior pharyngeal constrictor activity may serve to maintain relatively stable pharyngeal pressures in the absence of posterior tongue movement. Thus, the tongue-hold maneuver may be a relatively simple but robust example of how the medullary swallow center is equipped to dynamically coordinate actions between tongue and pharynx. Our findings emphasize the need for combined modality swallow assessment to include high-resolution manometry and intramuscular electromyography to evaluate the potential benefit of the tongue-hold maneuver for clinical populations.     

Barriers and facilitators to linkage to care and ART initiation in the setting of high ART coverage in Botswana

ABSTRACT

We conducted a qualitative study using focus groups and in-depth interviews to explore barriers to and facilitators of linkage-to-care and antiretroviral treatment (ART) initiation in Botswana. Participants were selected from communities receiving interventions through the Ya Tsie Study. Fifteen healthcare providers and 49 HIV-positive individuals participated. HIV-positive participants identified barriers including stigma, discrimination and overcrowded clinics, and negative staff attitudes; personal factors, such as a lack of acceptance of one’s HIV status, non-disclosure, and gender differences; along with lack of social/family support, and certain religious beliefs. Healthcare providers cited delayed test results, poverty, and transport difficulties as additional barriers. Major facilitators were support from healthcare providers, including home visits, social support, and knowing the benefits of ART. Participants were highly supportive of universal ART as a personal health measure. Our results highlighted a persistent structural health facility barrier: HIV-positive patients expressed strong discontent with HIV care/treatment being delivered differently than routine healthcare, feeling inconvenienced and stigmatized by separately designated locations and days of service. This barrier was particularly problematic for highly mobile persons. Addressing this structural barrier, which persists even in the context of high ART uptake, could bring gains in willingness to initiate ART and improved adherence in Botswana and elsewhere.     

Blood pressure regulation VII. The “morning surge” in blood pressure: measurement issues and clinical significance

In keeping with this review-series theme, we question whether the morning surge in blood pressure (MSBP) is a benign response to the physiological challenges during the first 3 h after waking, or is it clinically important? Therefore, we scrutinise the circadian-related mechanisms, the measurement methods and the prognostic value of the MSBP. The MSBP is relatively small (<2 mmHg) under constant routine conditions. Nevertheless, the blood pressure response to exercise can be 8–14 mm Hg greater in the morning vs. afternoon, even when prior sleep is controlled. Systematic bias between MSBP methods can be >10 mmHg. The “sleep-trough” method provides the largest MSBP (≈25 mmHg), but the sensitivity of MSBP to a treatment/intervention depends largely on its repeatability. The repeatability standard deviation (SD) for most MSBP methods is ≈8 mm Hg. While the magnitude of this SD precludes the use of MSBP for diagnostic decisions on individual patients, sample sizes for future intervention studies may be feasible, depending on the minimal clinically important difference in MSBP. This difference is somewhat unclear given that a large MSBP has recently been reported to predict a reduced, rather than a higher, risk of cardiovascular disease, although this particular study has been criticised. The MSBP is also naturally correlated to changes in physical activity and nocturnal “dipping” status. Therefore, it is important to account for these potential confounders of the MSBP, so that more precise knowledge about its clinical significance is gained, thereby providing a sound rationale for physiological investigation and translational research.     

Measurement of benefits in economic evaluations of nutrition interventions in low‐ and middle‐income countries: A systematic review

Economic evaluation of nutrition interventions that compares the costs to benefits is essential to priority‐setting. However, there are unique challenges to synthesizing the findings of multi‐sectoral nutrition interventions due to the diversity of potential benefits and the methodological differences among sectors in measuring them. This systematic review summarises literature on the interventions, sectors, benefit terminology and benefit types included in cost‐effectiveness, cost‐utility and benefit‐cost analyses (CEA, CUA and BCA, respectively) of nutrition interventions in low‐ and middle‐income countries. A systematic search of five databases published from January 2010 to September 2019 with expert consultation yielded 2794 studies, of which 93 met all inclusion criteria. Eighty‐seven per cent of the included studies included interventions delivered from only one sector, with almost half from the health sector (43%), followed by food/agriculture (27%), water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) (10%), and social protection (8%). Only 9% of studies assessed programmes involving more than one sector (health, food/agriculture, social protection and/or WASH). Eighty‐one per cent of studies used more than one term to refer to intervention benefits. The included studies calculated 128 economic evaluation ratios (57 CEAs, 39 CUAs and 32 BCAs), and the benefits they included varied by sector. Nearly 60% measured a single benefit category, most frequently nutritional status improvements; other health benefits, cognitive/education gains, dietary diversity, food security, knowledge/attitudes/practices and income were included in less than 10% of all ratios. Additional economic evaluation of non‐health and multi‐sector interventions, and incorporation of benefits beyond nutritional improvements (including cost savings) in future economic evaluations is recommended.     

Light exposure during sleep impairs cardiometabolic function

This study tested the hypothesis that acute exposure to light during nighttime sleep adversely affects next-morning glucose homeostasis and whether this effect occurs via reduced sleep quality, melatonin suppression, or sympathetic nervous system (SNS) activation during sleep. A total of 20 young adults participated in this parallel-group study design. The room light condition (n = 10) included one night of sleep in dim light (<3 lx) followed by one night of sleep with overhead room lighting (100 lx). The dim light condition (n = 10) included two consecutive nights of sleep in dim light. Measures of insulin resistance (morning homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance, 30-min insulin area under the curve [AUC] from a 2-h oral glucose tolerance test) were higher in the room light versus dim light condition. Melatonin levels were similar in both conditions. In the room light condition, participants spent proportionately more time in stage N2 and less in slow wave and rapid eye movement sleep. Heart rate was higher and heart rate variability lower (higher sympathovagal balance) during sleep in the room light versus the dim light condition. Importantly, the higher sympathovagal balance during sleep was associated with higher 30-min insulin AUC, consistent with increased insulin resistance the following morning. These results demonstrate that a single night of exposure to room light during sleep can impair glucose homeostasis, potentially via increased SNS activation. Attention to avoiding exposure to light at night during sleep may be beneficial for cardiometabolic health.

Exposure to artificial light during the night is widespread globally, particularly in industrialized countries (1–3). Given that light and dark exposure patterns play a key role in the timing of many behaviors and physiological functions (4), exposure to light in the evening and night has been posited to be deleterious for human health and well-being (1, 5–10). Impacts of light exposure during sleep are not as well studied as other kinds of nighttime light exposure. However, a recent cross-sectional observation study noted that, compared to no light exposure during sleep, any self-reported artificial light exposure in the bedroom during sleep (small nightlight in room, light from outside room, or television/light in room) was associated with obesity in women (11). Furthermore, the incidence of obesity was highest in those who reported sleeping with a television or light on in the bedroom (11). These findings suggest that light in the bedroom during nighttime sleep may negatively influence metabolic regulation.Emerging evidence indicates that light exposure plays a role in human metabolic regulation, with evening light exposure having unfavorable effects on metabolic functions including decreased glucose tolerance and decreased insulin sensitivity (12, 13). In line with these data, we have previously shown that blue-enriched light exposure in the morning and evening alters glucose metabolism, with an increase in insulin resistance compared to dim light exposure (14). In addition, evidence indicates that nighttime indoor light exposure during the habitual sleep period while awake (15), and during sleep itself (16), likely has deleterious metabolic effects. A recent study prospectively measured light exposure in the bedroom during nighttime sleep and showed that higher levels of bedroom light exposure were associated with a higher incidence of type 2 diabetes in an elderly population (16). However, the exact mechanisms by which light exposure, particularly during nighttime sleep, impacts metabolic regulation are not well understood.A proposed pathway to explain the relationship between nighttime light exposure and altered metabolic function is via changes in sleep. Robust evidence from epidemiological and experimental studies indicates that nighttime light exposure, either from outdoor or indoor sources, has negative impacts on subjective and objective sleep quality as indicated by actigraphy or polysomnography (PSG) measures of reduced total sleep time (TST), sleep efficiency (SE), increased wake after sleep onset (WASO), reduced amount of slow wave sleep (SWS), or increased arousal index (AI) (17–20). Given the well-established contribution of sleep disruptions to metabolic dysfunction (21), it is plausible that nighttime light exposure alters glucose metabolism due to disturbances to sleep. However, nighttime light exposure also appears to have a direct effect on glucose regulation that is independent of sleep loss, as shown by a study that subjected healthy male individuals to sleep deprivation in the dark or to sleep deprivation with nighttime light exposure (22). This study showed that a full night of sleep deprivation with nighttime light exposure increased postprandial levels of insulin and glucagon-like peptide-1, increased insulin resistance, and reduced nighttime melatonin; these changes were not observed under conditions of sleep deprivation in darkness.A second proposed mechanism to explain the impairment of glucose metabolism from nighttime light exposure is via light-induced changes to the endogenous circadian system, including suppression and phase shifting of the melatonin rhythm (23). It is well established that light exposure suppresses melatonin secretion (24, 25), and several studies have implicated suppression of nighttime melatonin with incidence of diabetes (26) and insulin resistance (27). The association between altered melatonin levels and changes in glucose regulation may be explained by evidence that melatonin plays a role in the secretion and action of insulin (28–30). In particular, lower melatonin levels resulting from light exposure during the nighttime sleep period, in a fasting condition, have been suggested to alter melatonin’s facilitation of pancreatic β-cell recovery (31). Moreover, evidence shows that light exposure, even of moderate intensity, during the nighttime sleep period can produce a phase shift of the internal circadian system (32, 33). Given the established role of the circadian system in the control of glucose metabolism, light exposure during the nighttime sleep period could facilitate the misalignment between the central clock and peripheral clocks in metabolic tissues, with consequent negative impact on glucose homeostasis (34).A third potential mechanism is the effect of light exposure on autonomic nervous system (ANS) activity. Light exposure has an arousing effect on the sympathetic autonomic system as revealed by the increase in cortisol or heart rate (HR) associated with light exposure mainly during the morning and/or nighttime hours as compared to evening hours (35–37). Beyond the direct excitatory effect exerted by light exposure on sympathetic activity (35), alterations of the ANS characterized by a shift toward an increased sympathetic drive have also been suggested to mediate the negative effects of sleep disruption on many physiological systems such as glucose metabolism (38). Thus, it is plausible that light-induced autonomic activation, either directly and/or mediated by sleep disruption, significantly contributes to the observed relationship between nighttime light exposure and altered glucose metabolism. Notably, sympathetic overactivity has been shown to precede the development of insulin resistance and prediabetes and contribute to the development of obesity and metabolic syndrome (39–41).Prior studies have reported that light exposure during sleep increases HR and decreases HR variability (HRV), consistent with increased sympathetic activation (42–44). These studies either examined bright light (1,000 lx) over the entire sleep period (42) or lower light levels (50 lx or dawn simulation) early or late in the sleep period (43, 44). However, the effect of a single night of moderate room light exposure across the entire nighttime sleep period on autonomic activation and its impact on metabolic function has never been fully investigated.In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that room light exposure (100 lx) during habitual nighttime sleep is associated with increased insulin resistance as measured by the homeostatic model of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), the Matsuda insulin sensitivity index, and impaired response to an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) the next morning. In addition, we hypothesized potential mechanisms of light-induced metabolic changes, such as reduced sleep quality, suppression of melatonin level, and elevated sympathetic activation (HR and HRV) during the sleep period.